linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Buffered I/O broken on s390x with page faults disabled (gfs2)
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:37:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2266e1a8-ac79-94a1-b6e2-47475e5986c5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bcafacea-7e67-405c-a969-e5a58a3c727e@redhat.com>

On 08.03.22 09:21, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 08.03.22 00:18, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:52 PM Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> After generic_file_read_iter() returns a short or empty read, we fault
>>> in some pages with fault_in_iov_iter_writeable(). This succeeds, but
>>> the next call to generic_file_read_iter() returns -EFAULT and we're
>>> not making any progress.
>>
>> Since this is s390-specific, I get the very strong feeling that the
>>
>>   fault_in_iov_iter_writeable ->
>>     fault_in_safe_writeable ->
>>       __get_user_pages_locked ->
>>         __get_user_pages
>>
>> path somehow successfully finds the page, despite it not being
>> properly accessible in the page tables.
> 
> As raised offline already, I suspect
> 
> shrink_active_list()
> ->page_referenced()
>  ->page_referenced_one()
>   ->ptep_clear_flush_young_notify()
>    ->ptep_clear_flush_young()
> 
> which results on s390x in:
> 
> static inline pte_t pte_mkold(pte_t pte)
> {
> 	pte_val(pte) &= ~_PAGE_YOUNG;
> 	pte_val(pte) |= _PAGE_INVALID;
> 	return pte;
> }
> 
> static inline int ptep_test_and_clear_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> 					    unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
> {
> 	pte_t pte = *ptep;
> 
> 	pte = ptep_xchg_direct(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, pte_mkold(pte));
> 	return pte_young(pte);
> }
> 
> 
> _PAGE_INVALID is the actual HW bit, _PAGE_PRESENT is a
> pure SW bit. AFAIU, pte_present() still holds:
> 
> static inline int pte_present(pte_t pte)
> {
> 	/* Bit pattern: (pte & 0x001) == 0x001 */
> 	return (pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_PRESENT) != 0;
> }
> 
> 
> pte_mkyoung() will revert that action:
> 
> static inline pte_t pte_mkyoung(pte_t pte)
> {
> 	pte_val(pte) |= _PAGE_YOUNG;
> 	if (pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_READ)
> 		pte_val(pte) &= ~_PAGE_INVALID;
> 	return pte;
> }
> 
> 
> and pte_modify() will adjust it properly again:
> 
> /*
>  * The following pte modification functions only work if
>  * pte_present() is true. Undefined behaviour if not..
>  */
> static inline pte_t pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot)
> {
> 	pte_val(pte) &= _PAGE_CHG_MASK;
> 	pte_val(pte) |= pgprot_val(newprot);
> 	/*
> 	 * newprot for PAGE_NONE, PAGE_RO, PAGE_RX, PAGE_RW and PAGE_RWX
> 	 * has the invalid bit set, clear it again for readable, young pages
> 	 */
> 	if ((pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_YOUNG) && (pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_READ))
> 		pte_val(pte) &= ~_PAGE_INVALID;
> 	/*
> 	 * newprot for PAGE_RO, PAGE_RX, PAGE_RW and PAGE_RWX has the page
> 	 * protection bit set, clear it again for writable, dirty pages
> 	 */
> 	if ((pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_DIRTY) && (pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_WRITE))
> 		pte_val(pte) &= ~_PAGE_PROTECT;
> 	return pte;
> }
> 
> 
> 
> Which leaves me wondering if there is a way in GUP whereby
> we would lookup that page and not clear _PAGE_INVALID,
> resulting in GUP succeeding but faults via the MMU still
> faulting on _PAGE_INVALID.


follow_page_pte() has this piece of code:

	if (flags & FOLL_TOUCH) {
		if ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) &&
		    !pte_dirty(pte) && !PageDirty(page))
			set_page_dirty(page);
		/*
		 * pte_mkyoung() would be more correct here, but atomic care
		 * is needed to avoid losing the dirty bit: it is easier to use
		 * mark_page_accessed().
		 */
		mark_page_accessed(page);
	}

Which at least to me suggests that, although the page is marked accessed and GUP
succeeds, that the PTE might still have _PAGE_INVALID set after we succeeded GUP.


On s390x, there is no HW dirty bit, so we might just be able to do a proper
pte_mkyoung() here instead of the mark_page_accessed().

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-08  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-07 22:52 Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-07 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08  8:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08  8:37     ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2022-03-08 12:11       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 12:24         ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 13:20           ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-08 13:32             ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14               ` Gerald Schaefer
2022-03-08 17:23           ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 17:26     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08 17:40       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08 19:27         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08 20:03           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08 23:24             ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-09  0:22               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-09 18:42                 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-09 19:08                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-09 20:57                     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-09 21:08                     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-10 12:13                       ` Filipe Manana
2022-03-09 19:21                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-09 19:35                     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-09 20:18                       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-09 20:36                         ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-09 20:48                           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-09 20:54                             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-10 17:13           ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-10 18:00             ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-10 18:35             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-10 18:38               ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-10 18:47               ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-10 19:22                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-10 19:56                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-10 20:23                     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2022-03-08 17:47       ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2266e1a8-ac79-94a1-b6e2-47475e5986c5@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox