From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] ACPI / memhotplug: Drop unnecessary code
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 01:34:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2228904.eTtCrFuSan@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2250271.rGYN6WlBxf@vostro.rjw.lan>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Now that the memory offlining should be taken care of by the
companion device offlining code in acpi_scan_hot_remove(), the
ACPI memory hotplug driver doesn't need to offline it in
acpi_memory_remove_memory() any more. Consequently, it doesn't
need to call remove_memory() any more, which means that that
funtion may be dropped entirely, because acpi_memory_remove_memory()
is the only user of it.
Make the changes described above to get rid of the dead code.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 15 ------
include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 1
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 102 -----------------------------------------
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c
@@ -271,31 +271,20 @@ static int acpi_memory_enable_device(str
return 0;
}
-static int acpi_memory_remove_memory(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
+static void acpi_memory_remove_memory(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
{
acpi_handle handle = mem_device->device->handle;
- int result = 0, nid;
struct acpi_memory_info *info, *n;
- nid = acpi_get_node(handle);
-
list_for_each_entry_safe(info, n, &mem_device->res_list, list) {
if (!info->enabled)
continue;
- if (nid < 0)
- nid = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(info->start_addr);
-
+ /* All of the memory blocks are offline at this point. */
acpi_unbind_memory_blocks(info, handle);
- result = remove_memory(nid, info->start_addr, info->length);
- if (result)
- return result;
-
list_del(&info->list);
kfree(info);
}
-
- return result;
}
static void acpi_memory_device_free(struct acpi_memory_device *mem_device)
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
@@ -252,7 +252,6 @@ extern int add_memory(int nid, u64 start
extern int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
extern int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages);
extern bool is_memblock_offlined(struct memory_block *mem);
-extern int remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
extern int sparse_add_one_section(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
int nr_pages);
extern void sparse_remove_one_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms);
Index: linux-pm/mm/memory_hotplug.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ linux-pm/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1670,41 +1670,6 @@ int walk_memory_range(unsigned long star
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
-/**
- * offline_memory_block_cb - callback function for offlining memory block
- * @mem: the memory block to be offlined
- * @arg: buffer to hold error msg
- *
- * Always return 0, and put the error msg in arg if any.
- */
-static int offline_memory_block_cb(struct memory_block *mem, void *arg)
-{
- int *ret = arg;
- int error = device_offline(&mem->dev);
-
- if (error != 0 && *ret == 0)
- *ret = error;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int is_memblock_offlined_cb(struct memory_block *mem, void *arg)
-{
- int ret = !is_memblock_offlined(mem);
-
- if (unlikely(ret)) {
- phys_addr_t beginpa, endpa;
-
- beginpa = PFN_PHYS(section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr));
- endpa = PFN_PHYS(section_nr_to_pfn(mem->end_section_nr + 1))-1;
- pr_warn("removing memory fails, because memory "
- "[%pa-%pa] is onlined\n",
- &beginpa, &endpa);
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
static int check_cpu_on_node(void *data)
{
struct pglist_data *pgdat = data;
@@ -1812,76 +1777,9 @@ void try_offline_node(int nid)
memset(pgdat, 0, sizeof(*pgdat));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_offline_node);
-
-int __ref remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
-{
- unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
- int ret = 0;
- int retry = 1;
-
- start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(start);
- end_pfn = PFN_UP(start + size - 1);
-
- /*
- * When CONFIG_MEMCG is on, one memory block may be used by other
- * blocks to store page cgroup when onlining pages. But we don't know
- * in what order pages are onlined. So we iterate twice to offline
- * memory:
- * 1st iterate: offline every non primary memory block.
- * 2nd iterate: offline primary (i.e. first added) memory block.
- */
-repeat:
- walk_memory_range(start_pfn, end_pfn, &ret,
- offline_memory_block_cb);
- if (ret) {
- if (!retry)
- return ret;
-
- retry = 0;
- ret = 0;
- goto repeat;
- }
-
- lock_memory_hotplug();
-
- /*
- * we have offlined all memory blocks like this:
- * 1. lock memory hotplug
- * 2. offline a memory block
- * 3. unlock memory hotplug
- *
- * repeat step1-3 to offline the memory block. All memory blocks
- * must be offlined before removing memory. But we don't hold the
- * lock in the whole operation. So we should check whether all
- * memory blocks are offlined.
- */
-
- ret = walk_memory_range(start_pfn, end_pfn, NULL,
- is_memblock_offlined_cb);
- if (ret) {
- unlock_memory_hotplug();
- return ret;
- }
-
- /* remove memmap entry */
- firmware_map_remove(start, start + size, "System RAM");
-
- arch_remove_memory(start, size);
-
- try_offline_node(nid);
-
- unlock_memory_hotplug();
-
- return 0;
-}
#else
int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
{
return -EINVAL;
}
-int remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
-{
- return -EINVAL;
-}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(remove_memory);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-18 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-18 23:29 [PATCH 0/5] ACPI / scan / memhotplug: ACPI hotplug rework followup changes Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-18 23:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] ACPI: Drop removal_type field from struct acpi_device Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-18 23:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] ACPI / processor: Pass processor object handle to acpi_bind_one() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-18 23:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] Driver core / MM: Drop offline_memory_block() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-19 1:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-05-18 23:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] ACPI / scan: Add second pass of companion offlining to hot-remove code Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-21 7:34 ` Xishi Qiu
2013-05-21 10:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-18 23:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-05-20 17:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] ACPI / memhotplug: Drop unnecessary code Toshi Kani
2013-05-20 19:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-20 19:55 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-20 21:31 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-22 22:09 ` [PATCH *5/5] Memory hotplug / ACPI: Simplify memory removal (was: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ACPI / memhotplug: Drop unnecessary code) Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-23 16:45 ` Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2228904.eTtCrFuSan@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox