From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>,
Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@gmail.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] mempolicy: migration attempt to match interleave nodes
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 01:36:21 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21a2895b-4590-a0f4-c81c-67e059494583@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d872cef-7787-a7ca-10e-9d45a64c80b4@google.com>
Improve alloc_migration_target_by_mpol()'s treatment of MPOL_INTERLEAVE.
Make an effort in do_mbind(), to identify the correct interleave index
for the first page to be migrated, so that it and all subsequent pages
from the same vma will be targeted to precisely their intended nodes.
Pages from following vmas will still be interleaved from the requested
nodemask, but perhaps starting from a different base.
Whether this is worth doing at all, or worth improving further, is
arguable: queue_folio_required() is right not to care about the precise
placement on interleaved nodes; but this little effort seems appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 74b1894d29c1..7bb9ff69879b 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -430,6 +430,11 @@ static bool strictly_unmovable(unsigned long flags)
MPOL_MF_STRICT;
}
+struct migration_mpol { /* for alloc_migration_target_by_mpol() */
+ struct mempolicy *pol;
+ pgoff_t ilx;
+};
+
struct queue_pages {
struct list_head *pagelist;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -1175,8 +1180,9 @@ int do_migrate_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, const nodemask_t *from,
static struct folio *alloc_migration_target_by_mpol(struct folio *src,
unsigned long private)
{
- struct mempolicy *pol = (struct mempolicy *)private;
- pgoff_t ilx = 0; /* improve on this later */
+ struct migration_mpol *mmpol = (struct migration_mpol *)private;
+ struct mempolicy *pol = mmpol->pol;
+ pgoff_t ilx = mmpol->ilx;
struct page *page;
unsigned int order;
int nid = numa_node_id();
@@ -1231,6 +1237,7 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev;
struct vma_iterator vmi;
+ struct migration_mpol mmpol;
struct mempolicy *new;
unsigned long end;
long err;
@@ -1311,9 +1318,48 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
new = get_task_policy(current);
mpol_get(new);
}
+ mmpol.pol = new;
+ mmpol.ilx = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * In the interleaved case, attempt to allocate on exactly the
+ * targeted nodes, for the first VMA to be migrated; for later
+ * VMAs, the nodes will still be interleaved from the targeted
+ * nodemask, but one by one may be selected differently.
+ */
+ if (new->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
+ struct page *page;
+ unsigned int order;
+ unsigned long addr = -EFAULT;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(page, &pagelist, lru) {
+ if (!PageKsm(page))
+ break;
+ }
+ if (!list_entry_is_head(page, &pagelist, lru)) {
+ vma_iter_init(&vmi, mm, start);
+ for_each_vma_range(vmi, vma, end) {
+ addr = page_address_in_vma(page, vma);
+ if (addr != -EFAULT)
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (addr != -EFAULT) {
+ order = compound_order(page);
+ /* We already know the pol, but not the ilx */
+ mpol_cond_put(get_vma_policy(vma, addr, order,
+ &mmpol.ilx));
+ /* HugeTLBfs indexes in hpage_size */
+ if (order && PageHuge(page))
+ order = 0;
+ /* Set base from which to increment by index */
+ mmpol.ilx -= page->index >> order;
+ }
+ }
+
nr_failed |= migrate_pages(&pagelist,
alloc_migration_target_by_mpol, NULL,
- (unsigned long)new, MIGRATE_SYNC,
+ (unsigned long)&mmpol, MIGRATE_SYNC,
MR_MEMPOLICY_MBIND, NULL);
}
--
2.35.3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-25 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-25 8:17 [PATCH 00/12] mempolicy: cleanups leading to NUMA mpol without vma Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 8:21 ` [PATCH 01/12] hugetlbfs: drop shared NUMA mempolicy pretence Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 22:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-25 22:46 ` Andi Kleen
2023-09-26 22:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 8:22 ` [PATCH 02/12] kernfs: drop shared NUMA mempolicy hooks Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 22:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-25 8:24 ` [PATCH 03/12] mempolicy: fix migrate_pages(2) syscall return nr_failed Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 22:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-26 20:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-09-27 8:02 ` Huang, Ying
2023-09-30 4:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 8:25 ` [PATCH 04/12] mempolicy trivia: delete those ancient pr_debug()s Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 22:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-25 8:26 ` [PATCH 05/12] mempolicy trivia: slightly more consistent naming Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 22:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-25 8:28 ` [PATCH 06/12] mempolicy trivia: use pgoff_t in shared mempolicy tree Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 22:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-25 22:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-26 21:19 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 8:29 ` [PATCH 07/12] mempolicy: mpol_shared_policy_init() without pseudo-vma Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 22:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-26 21:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 8:30 ` [PATCH 08/12] mempolicy: remove confusing MPOL_MF_LAZY dead code Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 22:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-25 8:32 ` [PATCH 09/12] mm: add page_rmappable_folio() wrapper Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 22:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-26 21:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 8:33 ` [PATCH 10/12] mempolicy: alloc_pages_mpol() for NUMA policy without vma Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 8:35 ` [PATCH 11/12] mempolicy: mmap_lock is not needed while migrating folios Hugh Dickins
2023-09-25 8:36 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21a2895b-4590-a0f4-c81c-67e059494583@google.com \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox