linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: x86: WARNING: at mm/memblock.c:1339 memblock_set_node - Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is deprecated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:19:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20c484a5-d797-4782-b5b5-bea5fcae9284@paulmck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eaa90c1a-ae96-4506-90dd-146ce85d311c@suse.com>

On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 08:13:17AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.06.2024 22:48, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 09:46:37PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 05.06.2024 21:07, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 07:19:21PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> >>>> The following kernel warnings are noticed on x86 devices while booting
> >>>> the Linux next-20240603 tag and looks like it is expected to warn users to
> >>>> use NUMA_NO_NODE instead.
> >>>>
> >>>> Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is deprecated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead
> >>>>
> >>>> The following config is enabled
> >>>> CONFIG_NUMA=y
> >>>
> >>> I am seeing this as well.  Is the following commit premature?
> >>>
> >>> e0eec24e2e19 ("memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES")
> >>>
> >>> Maybe old ACPI tables and device trees need to catch up?
> >>>
> >>> Left to myself, I would simply remove the WARN_ON_ONCE() from the above
> >>> commit, but I would guess that there is a better way.
> >>
> >> Well, the warning is issued precisely to make clear that call
> >> sites need to change. A patch to do so for the two instances
> >> on x86 that I'm aware of is already pending maintainer approval.
> > 
> > Could you please point me at that patch so that I can stop repeatedly
> > reproducing those two particular issues?
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/abadb736-a239-49e4-ab42-ace7acdd4278@suse.com/

Thank you, Jan!

A quick initial test shows that this clears things up.  I have started
a longer test to check for additional issues.  But in the meantime
for the issues I was already seeing in the initial test:

Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

							Thanx, Paul


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-06 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-03 13:49 Naresh Kamboju
2024-06-05 19:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-05 19:46   ` Jan Beulich
2024-06-05 20:48     ` Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]       ` <eaa90c1a-ae96-4506-90dd-146ce85d311c@suse.com>
2024-06-06 14:19         ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2024-06-06 18:04           ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-06 19:48             ` Mike Rapoport
2024-06-06 20:17               ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20c484a5-d797-4782-b5b5-bea5fcae9284@paulmck-laptop \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox