From: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] selftest/mm: adjust hugepage-mremap test size for large huge pages
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 02:15:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20a95f92-57f9-44cc-bc40-8110dd562998@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e859cfa-db79-4676-9509-81a2140db3f3@kernel.org>
On 01/04/26 19:40, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 3/27/26 08:16, Sayali Patil wrote:
>> The hugepage-mremap selftest uses a default size of 10MB, which is
>> sufficient for small huge page sizes. However, when the huge page size
>> is large (e.g. 1GB), 10MB is smaller than a single huge page.
>> As a result, the test does not trigger PMD sharing and the
>> corresponding unshare path in mremap(), causing the
>> test to fail (mremap succeeds where a failure is expected).
>>
>> Update run_vmtest.sh to use twice the huge page size when the huge page
>> size exceeds 10MB, while retaining the 10MB default for smaller huge
>> pages. This ensures the test exercises the intended PMD sharing and
>> unsharing paths for larger huge page sizes.
>>
>> Before patch:
>> running ./hugepage-mremap
>> ------------------------------
>> TAP version 13
>> 1..1
>> Map haddr: Returned address is 0x7eaa40000000
>> Map daddr: Returned address is 0x7daa40000000
>> Map vaddr: Returned address is 0x7faa40000000
>> Address returned by mmap() = 0x7fffaa600000
>> Mremap: Returned address is 0x7faa40000000
>> First hex is 0
>> First hex is 3020100
>> Bail out! mremap: Expected failure, but call succeeded
>> Planned tests != run tests (1 != 0)
>> Totals: pass:0 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>> [FAIL]
>> not ok 1 hugepage-mremap # exit=1
>>
>> Before patch:
>> running ./hugepage-mremap
>> ------------------------------
>> TAP version 13
>> 1..1
>> Map haddr: Returned address is 0x7eaa40000000
>> Map daddr: Returned address is 0x7daa40000000
>> Map vaddr: Returned address is 0x7faa40000000
>> Address returned by mmap() = 0x7fffaa600000
>> Mremap: Returned address is 0x7faa40000000
>> First hex is 0
>> First hex is 3020100
>> Bail out! mremap: Expected failure, but call succeeded
>> Planned tests != run tests (1 != 0)
>> Totals: pass:0 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>> [FAIL]
>> not ok 1 hugepage-mremap # exit=1
>>
>
> Why are there two "Before patch" in here?
Thanks for pointing that out, Let me fix it in the next version.
>
>> After patch:
>> running ./hugepage-mremap 2048
>> ------------------------------
>> TAP version 13
>> 1..1
>> Map haddr: Returned address is 0x7eaa40000000
>> Map daddr: Returned address is 0x7daa40000000
>> Map vaddr: Returned address is 0x7faa40000000
>> Address returned by mmap() = 0x7fff13000000
>> Mremap: Returned address is 0x7faa40000000
>> First hex is 0
>> First hex is 3020100
>> ok 1 Read same data
>> Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>> [PASS]
>> ok 1 hugepage-mremap 2048
>>
>> Fixes: f77a286de48c ("mm, hugepages: make memory size variable in hugepage-mremap selftest")
>> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>> Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 13 ++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
>> index afdcfd0d7cef..eecec0b6eb13 100755
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
>> @@ -293,7 +293,18 @@ echo "$shmmax" > /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax
>> echo "$shmall" > /proc/sys/kernel/shmall
>>
>> CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./map_hugetlb
>> -CATEGORY="hugetlb" run_test ./hugepage-mremap
>> +
>> +# If the huge page size is larger than 10MB, increase the test memory size
>> +# to twice the huge page size (in MB) to ensure the test exercises PMD sharing
>> +# and the unshare path in hugepage-mremap. Otherwise, run the test with
>> +# the default 10MB memory size.
>
> PMD sharing requires, on x86, a 1 GiB area with 2 MiB hugetlb folios.
>
> How does doubling sort that out?
>
> Also, why the magic value 10mb?
>
>
Hi David,
Yes, 1GB huge pages are mapped at the PUD level and are not involved in
PMD sharing, as huge_pte_alloc() skips sharing for sizes other than
PMD_SIZE.
The issue here is due to an unaligned memory size on a 1GB mapping.
This leads munmap() to fail at an unaligned address, causing the
subsequent expected-to-fail mremap() to unexpectedly succeed.
The default memory size for this test is 10MB.
Aligning the size to a multiple of 1GB avoids this failure, but it is
not related to PMD sharing. I will update the description in v4 to
reflect this more accurately.
I will also update the test code directly to align the memory size to
the huge page size, rather than modifying run_vmtests.sh.
Thanks,
Sayali
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-27 7:15 [PATCH v3 00/13] selftests/mm: fix failures and robustness improvements Sayali Patil
2026-03-27 7:15 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] selftests/mm: restore default nr_hugepages value during cleanup in charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 14:52 ` Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 16:05 ` Sayali Patil
2026-03-27 7:15 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] selftests/mm: fix hugetlb pathname construction " Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 14:06 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-27 7:15 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] selftests/mm: fix hugetlb pathname construction in hugetlb_reparenting_test.sh Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 14:06 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-27 7:15 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] selftest/mm: fix cgroup task placement and drop memory.current checks " Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 14:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-03 19:59 ` Sayali Patil
2026-03-27 7:15 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] selftests/mm: size tmpfs according to PMD page size in split_huge_page_test Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 16:20 ` Sayali Patil
2026-03-27 7:16 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] selftest/mm: adjust hugepage-mremap test size for large huge pages Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 14:10 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-01 20:45 ` Sayali Patil [this message]
2026-03-27 7:16 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] selftest/mm: register existing mapping with userfaultfd in hugepage-mremap Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 14:18 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-01 14:43 ` Sayali Patil
2026-04-02 7:31 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-03 17:41 ` Sayali Patil
2026-03-27 7:16 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] selftests/mm: ensure destination is hugetlb-backed " Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 14:21 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-01 14:40 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-04-01 20:39 ` Sayali Patil
2026-04-02 7:33 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-02 9:05 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-04-03 17:41 ` Sayali Patil
2026-04-07 10:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-03-27 7:16 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] selftests/mm: skip uffd-wp-mremap if UFFD write-protect is unsupported Sayali Patil
2026-04-02 6:59 ` Sayali Patil
2026-03-27 7:16 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] selftests/mm: skip uffd-stress test when nr_pages_per_cpu is zero Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 14:23 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-27 7:16 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] selftests/mm: fix double increment in linked list cleanup in compaction_test Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 14:32 ` Sayali Patil
2026-04-01 14:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-01 17:33 ` Sayali Patil
2026-03-27 7:16 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] selftests/mm: move hwpoison setup into run_test() and silence modprobe output for memory-failure category Sayali Patil
2026-04-02 7:15 ` Sayali Patil
2026-03-27 7:16 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] selftests/cgroup: extend test_hugetlb_memcg.c to support all huge page sizes Sayali Patil
2026-04-03 17:16 ` Sayali Patil
2026-03-27 18:11 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] selftests/mm: fix failures and robustness improvements Andrew Morton
2026-03-30 5:57 ` Sayali Patil
2026-03-30 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-01 14:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-01 15:03 ` Sayali Patil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20a95f92-57f9-44cc-bc40-8110dd562998@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sayalip@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox