From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] mm, slab: ignore hardened usercopy parameters when disabled
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:35:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <206E0154-63A6-45CF-8E19-BD01B35AEF0B@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121171202.22080-2-vbabka@suse.cz>
On November 21, 2022 9:11:51 AM PST, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>With CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY not enabled, there are no
>__check_heap_object() checks happening that would use the kmem_cache
>useroffset and usersize fields. Yet the fields are still initialized,
>preventing merging of otherwise compatible caches. Thus ignore the
>values passed to cache creation and leave them zero when
>CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is disabled.
>
>In a quick virtme boot test, this has reduced the number of caches in
>/proc/slabinfo from 131 to 111.
>
>Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>---
> mm/slab_common.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
>index 0042fb2730d1..a8cb5de255fc 100644
>--- a/mm/slab_common.c
>+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
>@@ -317,7 +317,8 @@ kmem_cache_create_usercopy(const char *name,
> flags &= CACHE_CREATE_MASK;
>
> /* Fail closed on bad usersize of useroffset values. */
>- if (WARN_ON(!usersize && useroffset) ||
>+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY) ||
>+ WARN_ON(!usersize && useroffset) ||
> WARN_ON(size < usersize || size - usersize < useroffset))
> usersize = useroffset = 0;
>
>@@ -640,6 +641,9 @@ void __init create_boot_cache(struct kmem_cache *s, const char *name,
> align = max(align, size);
> s->align = calculate_alignment(flags, align, size);
>
>+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY))
>+ useroffset = usersize = 0;
>+
> s->useroffset = useroffset;
> s->usersize = usersize;
>
"Always non-mergeable" is intentional here, but I do see the argument for not doing it under hardened-usercopy.
That said, if you keep this part, maybe go the full step and ifdef away useroffset/usersize's struct member definition and other logic, especially for SLUB_TINY benefits, so 2 ulongs are dropped from the cache struct?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-21 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 17:11 [PATCH 00/12] Introduce CONFIG_SLUB_TINY and deprecate SLOB Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-21 17:11 ` [PATCH 01/12] mm, slab: ignore hardened usercopy parameters when disabled Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-21 21:35 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-11-23 14:23 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-24 11:16 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-24 11:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-24 12:33 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-21 17:11 ` [PATCH 02/12] mm, slub: add CONFIG_SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-24 1:08 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-11-24 11:33 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-25 7:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-21 17:11 ` [PATCH 03/12] mm, slub: disable SYSFS support with CONFIG_SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-24 1:12 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-11-24 9:00 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-21 17:11 ` [PATCH 04/12] mm, slub: retain no free slabs on partial list " Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-24 1:12 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-11-24 11:38 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-21 17:11 ` [PATCH 05/12] mm, slub: lower the default slub_max_order " Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-24 1:16 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-11-24 11:40 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-21 17:11 ` [PATCH 06/12] mm, slub: don't create kmalloc-rcl caches " Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-23 13:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-24 12:06 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-24 12:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-24 12:55 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-24 13:23 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-24 14:25 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-21 17:11 ` [PATCH 07/12] mm, slab: ignore SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT " Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-24 1:20 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-11-24 9:09 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-24 9:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2022-11-27 23:11 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-21 17:11 ` [PATCH 08/12] mm, slub: refactor free debug processing Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-27 10:18 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-21 17:11 ` [PATCH 09/12] mm, slub: split out allocations from pre/post hooks Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-27 10:54 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-27 23:01 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-28 13:06 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [PATCH 10/12] mm, slub: remove percpu slabs with CONFIG_SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-27 11:05 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-12-12 10:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-12-12 13:11 ` Dennis Zhou
2022-12-13 3:04 ` Baoquan He
2022-12-13 14:02 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-12-18 10:16 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [PATCH 11/12] mm, slub: don't aggressively inline " Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-28 13:19 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-21 17:12 ` [PATCH 12/12] mm, slob: rename CONFIG_SLOB to CONFIG_SLOB_DEPRECATED Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-21 18:41 ` Aaro Koskinen
2022-11-21 19:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-22 6:47 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-11-22 16:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-11-24 1:21 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-12-02 17:59 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-12-05 12:25 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-13 13:41 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-22 16:33 ` [PATCH 00/12] Introduce CONFIG_SLUB_TINY and deprecate SLOB Arnd Bergmann
2022-11-22 16:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-22 17:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-11-24 20:30 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=206E0154-63A6-45CF-8E19-BD01B35AEF0B@kernel.org \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox