Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] drivers/base/node: Remove register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node

[Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>]

On 5/22/25 4:01 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 12:06:06PM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
>> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 04:17:30AM -0500, Donet Tom wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
>>> index 5c763253c42c..6cf349c26780 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/node.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/node.h
>>> @@ -136,18 +136,8 @@ static inline int register_one_node(int nid)
>>>   {
>>>   	int error = 0;
>>>   
>>> -	if (node_online(nid)) {
>>> -		struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
>>> -		unsigned long start_pfn = pgdat->node_start_pfn;
>>> -		unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + pgdat->node_spanned_pages;
>>> -
>>> +	if (node_online(nid))
>>>   		error = __register_one_node(nid);
>> Heh, remembering this code always brings me joy.
>>
>> After this patch, register_one_node() is only called from try_online_node(), right?
>> Which, before calling in, explicitly sets the node online, so... we can get rid of
>> the node_online() check unless I am missing something.
>   
> I think you are right and a sensible follow up cleanup can be renaming
> __register_one_node() to register_one_node() :)

Thank you, Oscar and Mike.

Yes, I agree—we can remove register_one_node() entirely.

I will go ahead and remove register_one_node(), rename __register_one_node() to
register_one_node(), and send the next revision.

Thanks
DOnet

>   
>> -- 
>> Oscar Salvador
>> SUSE Labs
>>