linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>, Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Florent Revest <revest@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@google.com>,
	GONG Ruiqi <gongruiqi1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab: support for compiler-assisted type-based slab cache partitioning
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:22:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202604210954.84C57E5E0@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260415143735.2974230-1-elver@google.com>

On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 04:37:05PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> The builtin __builtin_infer_alloc_token(<malloc-args>, ...) instructs
> the compiler to infer an allocation type from arguments commonly passed
> to memory-allocating functions and returns a type-derived token ID. The
> implementation passes kmalloc-args to the builtin: the compiler performs
> best-effort type inference, and then recognizes common patterns such as
> `kmalloc(sizeof(T), ...)`, `kmalloc(sizeof(T) * n, ...)`, but also
> `(T *)kmalloc(...)`. Where the compiler fails to infer a type the
> fallback token (default: 0) is chosen.
> 
> Note: kmalloc_obj(..) APIs fix the pattern how size and result type are
> expressed, and therefore ensures there's not much drift in which
> patterns the compiler needs to recognize. Specifically, kmalloc_obj()
> and friends expand to `(TYPE *)KMALLOC(__obj_size, GFP)`, which the
> compiler recognizes via the cast to TYPE*.

Great! I'm glad this gets deterministically handled for the kmalloc_obj*
cases.

> Additionally, when I compile my kernel with -Rpass=alloc-token, which
> provides diagnostics where (after dead-code elimination) type inference
> failed, I see 186 allocation sites where the compiler failed to identify
> a type (down from 966 when I sent the RFC [4]). Some initial review
> confirms these are mostly variable sized buffers, but also include
> structs with trailing flexible length arrays.

For the call-site-partitioning series[1] I sent before, I had
per-site caches for fixed-sized allocations and size bucket caches for
variably-sized allocations. I'd like to see something similar for this
series. Specifically, I replaced "kmalloc_slab" with "choose_slab" that
did O(1) to find the dedicated cache/bucket for the allocation[2].

In this case, we now have a build-time-constant value that it should be
possible to use to look up a _single_ dedicated cache/bucket for the
given unique type: there is no need to do hashing.

> [...]
> -config RANDOM_KMALLOC_CACHES
> -	default n
> +config PARTITION_KMALLOC_CACHES
>  	depends on !SLUB_TINY
> -	bool "Randomize slab caches for normal kmalloc"
> +	bool "Partitioned slab caches for normal kmalloc"
>  	help
> -	  A hardening feature that creates multiple copies of slab caches for
> -	  normal kmalloc allocation and makes kmalloc randomly pick one based
> -	  on code address, which makes the attackers more difficult to spray
> -	  vulnerable memory objects on the heap for the purpose of exploiting
> -	  memory vulnerabilities.
> +	  A hardening feature that creates multiple isolated copies of slab
> +	  caches for normal kmalloc allocations. This makes it more difficult
> +	  to exploit memory-safety vulnerabilities by attacking vulnerable
> +	  co-located memory objects. Several modes are provided.
>  
>  	  Currently the number of copies is set to 16, a reasonably large value

The "16" buckets seems to hold for TYPED_KMALLOC_CACHES too? My goal
with the earlier type-partitioning was to get _total_ isolation, not
simply bucketed: 1 cache (or sizes-bucket) for each type. The "16"
limitation from RANDOM_KMALLOC_CACHES was kind of arbitrary due to the
hashing.

>  	  that effectively diverges the memory objects allocated for different
>  	  subsystems or modules into different caches, at the expense of a
> -	  limited degree of memory and CPU overhead that relates to hardware and
> -	  system workload.
> +	  limited degree of memory and CPU overhead that relates to hardware
> +	  and system workload.
> +
> +choice
> +	prompt "Partitioned slab cache mode"
> +	depends on PARTITION_KMALLOC_CACHES
> +	default RANDOM_KMALLOC_CACHES

I think this should be adjusted a bit:

config CC_HAS_ALLOC_TOKEN
	def_bool $(cc-option,-falloc-token-max=123)

...
choice
	prompt "Partitioned slab cache mode"
	depends on PARTITION_KMALLOC_CACHES
	default TYPED_KMALLOC_CACHES if CC_HAS_ALLOC_TOKEN
	default RANDOM_KMALLOC_CACHES

And actually, perhaps a global rename of the options so the selection
naming is at the end of the CONFIG phrase, and bundle the on/off into
the choice:


choice
	prompt "Partitioned slab cache mode"
	depends on PARTITION_KMALLOC_CACHES
	default KMALLOC_PARTITION_TYPED if !SLUB_TINY && CC_HAS_ALLOC_TOKEN
	default KMALLOC_PARTITION_RANDOM if !SLUB_TINY
	default KMALLOC_PARTITION_NONE

config KMALLOC_PARTITION_NONE
...
config KMALLOC_PARTITION_RANDOM
	depends on !SLUB_TINY
...
config KMALLOC_PARTITION_TYPED
	depends on !SLUB_TINY && CC_HAS_ALLOC_TOKEN

-Kees

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240809072532.work.266-kees@kernel.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240809073309.2134488-5-kees@kernel.org/

-- 
Kees Cook


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-21 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-15 14:37 Marco Elver
2026-04-16 13:42 ` Marco Elver
2026-04-20  7:25 ` Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-04-20  9:30   ` Marco Elver
2026-04-20 10:28     ` Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-04-21 17:22 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2026-04-21 19:13   ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202604210954.84C57E5E0@keescook \
    --to=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=gongruiqi1@huawei.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=matteorizzo@google.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=nsc@kernel.org \
    --cc=revest@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox