From: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
To: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>, Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/vmstat: remove unused __node_stat_* wrappers
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 19:29:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260415022910.1890050-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a852e74-1499-4a5a-8e98-56a33c67d639@linux.dev>
On Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:50:54 +0800 Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev> wrote:
>
>
> 在 2026/4/14 22:59, Joshua Hahn 写道:
> > On Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:15:20 +0800 Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
> >>
> >> Replace the single call to __node_stat_mod_folio()
> >> with node_stat_mod_folio(), and remove the dead inline __node_stat_*
> >> wrapper definitions from include/linux/vmstat.h.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
> >> ---
> >> include/linux/vmstat.h | 18 ------------------
> >> mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/vmstat.h b/include/linux/vmstat.h
> >> index 3c9c266cf782..54da7d820f78 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/vmstat.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/vmstat.h
> >> @@ -440,24 +440,6 @@ static inline void zone_stat_sub_folio(struct folio *folio,
> >> mod_zone_page_state(folio_zone(folio), item, -folio_nr_pages(folio));
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static inline void __node_stat_mod_folio(struct folio *folio,
> >> - enum node_stat_item item, long nr)
> >> -{
> >> - __mod_node_page_state(folio_pgdat(folio), item, nr);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -static inline void __node_stat_add_folio(struct folio *folio,
> >> - enum node_stat_item item)
> >> -{
> >> - __mod_node_page_state(folio_pgdat(folio), item, folio_nr_pages(folio));
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -static inline void __node_stat_sub_folio(struct folio *folio,
> >> - enum node_stat_item item)
> >> -{
> >> - __mod_node_page_state(folio_pgdat(folio), item, -folio_nr_pages(folio));
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> static inline void node_stat_mod_folio(struct folio *folio,
> >> enum node_stat_item item, long nr)
> >> {
> >> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> >> index 6f9b7b081ab7..ed3301753e89 100644
> >> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> >> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> >> @@ -2627,7 +2627,7 @@ static void folio_account_dirtied(struct folio *folio,
> >>
> >> lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_DIRTY, nr);
> >> __zone_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING, nr);
> >> - __node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_DIRTIED, nr);
> >> + node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_DIRTIED, nr);
> >
> > Hi Ye, thank you for the patch,
> >
> > In addition to what Matthew has pointed out, I also wanted to note that this
> > substitution isn't trivial; there are differences between the __ prefixed
> > version of node_stat_mod_folio and the one without. Even though the correctness
> > of the two versions might be the same, I think that a change like this should
> > be supplemented by a description of what side effects this change has
> > (i.e. introducing additional overhead from the cmpxchg loop).
> >
> > Thank you, I hope you have a great day!
> > Joshua
>
> Thank you for your review, Joshua. Regarding the difference between
> __node_stat_mod_folio and node_stat_mod_folio: in the current implementation,
> both functions ultimately use __mod_node_page_state, as mod_node_page_state
> is defined as __mod_node_page_state. There is no functional difference
> between them in terms of atomicity or overhead. The __ prefixed versions
> were wrappers that are now unused, which is why we're removing them.
Hello Ye,
Thanks for the quick response. However, I'm not sure that's true.
For #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL in mm/vmstat.c, I can see that
mod_node_page_state calls mod_node_state, which includes the cmpxchg loop.
I think many users enalbe this config, including x86. IMHO, we should document
this effect of the changes.
Thank you, I hope you have a great day!
Joshua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-14 9:15 [PATCH 0/4] mm/vmstat: simplify folio stat APIs Ye Liu
2026-04-14 9:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/vmstat: use node_stat_add_folio/sub_folio for folio_nr_pages operations Ye Liu
2026-04-14 17:52 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-15 0:48 ` Ye Liu
2026-04-14 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/vmstat: use zone_stat_add_folio/sub_folio " Ye Liu
2026-04-14 9:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/vmstat: remove unused __node_stat_* wrappers Ye Liu
2026-04-14 14:59 ` Joshua Hahn
2026-04-15 0:50 ` Ye Liu
2026-04-15 2:29 ` Joshua Hahn [this message]
2026-04-14 9:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/vmstat: remove unused __zone_stat_* wrappers Ye Liu
2026-04-14 13:18 ` [PATCH 0/4] mm/vmstat: simplify folio stat APIs Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-15 0:47 ` Ye Liu
2026-04-15 3:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260415022910.1890050-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--to=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuye@kylinos.cn \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ye.liu@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox