Re: (sashiko review) [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/damon/lru_sort: validate min_region_size to be power of 2

[Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>]

On Sun, 12 Apr 2026 14:37:19 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi Liew,
> 
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2026 03:04:55 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> > > Next Steps
> > > ----------
> > > 
> > > So, what to do?  Please prioritize series B, if you still willing to do.  It is
> > > ok to keep doing series A, but only as the minor user experience improvement.
> > > Clearly explain the whole context you are aware of.  Don't Cc stable@ for
> > > series A, as it is only an incomplete fix of it.  The fix of the one trigger
> > > point is just a side effect.
> > 
> > Yes, I absolutely want to continue contributing to DAMON.
> > 
> > I realize most of this confusion came from me misinterpreting your words
> > or making assumptions without asking. So this time, I want to be
> > explicit:
> > 1. I will remove the Cc stable@
> 
> Please also make the description of the patch clear.

I've been thinking about what you meant by "make the desciption of the
patch clear" for Series A.

Here's my current understanding:

"
This patch only fixes the case where kdamond terminates because
'min_region_sz' is not power-of-2. Other causes of unexpected
termination (e.g., memory allocation failures) are not fixed by this
patch. [Seires B] will address the general problem.
"

Is this what you had in mind? Or is there something else you think I
should add or change?

> I'd like to avoid delaying series B too long, though.  The bug is not very
> critical, but better to be fixed sooner than later.  If you have no enough
> capacity, please feel free to hand it over to me.

Yes, I have enough capacity. My exams are not until a couple of weeks
later, so I can focus on Series B now.

If my schedule gets too busy later, I will let you know and hand it over
as you suggested. Thank you for offering that.

> [...]

Best regards,
Rui Yan