From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: "Denis M. Karpov" <komlomal@gmail.com>
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
rppt@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, ljs@kernel.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
jannh@google.com, peterx@redhat.com, pfalcato@suse.de,
brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] userfaultfd: allow registration of ranges below mmap_min_addr
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 05:36:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260408123700.1596800-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260407081442.6256-1-komlomal@gmail.com>
On Tue, 7 Apr 2026 11:14:42 +0300 "Denis M. Karpov" <komlomal@gmail.com> wrote:
> The current implementation of validate_range() in fs/userfaultfd.c
> performs a hard check against mmap_min_addr without considering
> capabilities, but the mmap() syscall uses security_mmap_addr()
> which allows privileged processes (with CAP_SYS_RAWIO) to map below
> mmap_min_addr. Furthermore, security_mmap_addr()->cap_mmap_addr() uses
> dac_mmap_min_addr variable which can be changed with
> /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr.
>
> Because userfaultfd uses a different check, UFFDIO_REGISTER may fail
> with -EINVAL for valid memory areas that were successfully mapped
> below mmap_min_addr even with appropriate capabilities.
>
> This prevents apps like binary compilers from using UFFD for valid memory
> regions mapped by application.
>
> Replace the rigid mmap_min_addr check with security_mmap_addr() to align
> userfaultfd with the standard kernel memory mapping security policy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis M. Karpov <komlomal@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> Initial RFC following the discussion on the [BUG] thread.
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CADtiZd0tWysx5HMCUnOXfSHB7PXAuXg1Mh4eY_hUmH29S=sejg@mail.gmail.com/
> ---
> fs/userfaultfd.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> index bdc84e521..dbfe5b2a0 100644
> --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -1238,15 +1238,13 @@ static __always_inline int validate_unaligned_range(
> return -EINVAL;
> if (!len)
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (start < mmap_min_addr)
> - return -EINVAL;
> if (start >= task_size)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (len > task_size - start)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (start + len <= start)
> return -EINVAL;
> - return 0;
> + return security_mmap_addr(start);
Is this introducing an ABI change?
The old code returned -EINVAL when start was below mmap_min_addr.
The new code calls security_mmap_addr() which returns -EPERM when
the caller lacks CAP_SYS_RAWIO. Existing userspace callers checking
specifically for -EINVAL would see different behavior start is
below mmap_min_addr.
> }
>
> static __always_inline int validate_range(struct mm_struct *mm,
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 8:14 Denis M. Karpov
2026-04-08 3:21 ` Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-04-08 8:09 ` Denis M. Karpov
2026-04-08 12:36 ` Usama Arif [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260408123700.1596800-1-usama.arif@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=komlomal@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox