linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rientjes@google.com, seanjc@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
	 vannapurve@google.com, michael.roth@amd.com,
	jiaqiyan@google.com,  tabba@google.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 1/7] mm: memory_failure: Clarify the MF_DELAYED definition
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 17:24:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260408-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-rfc-v3-v3-1-718f45eb7c75@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260408-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-rfc-v3-v3-0-718f45eb7c75@google.com>

This patch clarifies the definition of MF_DELAYED to represent cases
where a folio's removal is initiated but not immediately completed
(e.g., due to remaining metadata references).

Signed-off-by: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
---
 mm/memory-failure.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index ee42d4361309..2e53b3024391 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -849,24 +849,25 @@ static int kill_accessing_process(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long pfn,
 }
 
 /*
- * MF_IGNORED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
+ * MF_IGNORED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
  * But it could not do more to isolate the page from being accessed again,
  * nor does it kill the process. This is extremely rare and one of the
  * potential causes is that the page state has been changed due to
  * underlying race condition. This is the most severe outcomes.
  *
- * MF_FAILED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
+ * MF_FAILED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
  * It should have killed the process, but it can't isolate the page,
  * due to conditions such as extra pin, unmap failure, etc. Accessing
  * the page again may trigger another MCE and the process will be killed
  * by the m-f() handler immediately.
  *
- * MF_DELAYED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
- * The page is unmapped, and is removed from the LRU or file mapping.
- * An attempt to access the page again will trigger page fault and the
- * PF handler will kill the process.
+ * MF_DELAYED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
+ * It means the page was unmapped and partially isolated (e.g. removed from
+ * file mapping or the LRU) but full cleanup is deferred (e.g. the metadata
+ * for the memory, as in struct page/folio, is still referenced). Any
+ * further access to the page will result in the process being killed.
  *
- * MF_RECOVERED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
+ * MF_RECOVERED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
  * The page has been completely isolated, that is, unmapped, taken out of
  * the buddy system, or hole-punched out of the file mapping.
  */

-- 
2.53.0.1213.gd9a14994de-goog



  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-08 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-08 17:24 [PATCH RFC v3 0/7] mm: Fix MF_DELAYED handling on memory failure Lisa Wang
2026-04-08 17:24 ` Lisa Wang [this message]
2026-04-08 17:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/7] mm: memory_failure: Allow truncate_error_folio to return MF_DELAYED Lisa Wang
2026-04-08 17:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/7] mm: shmem: Update shmem handler to the MF_DELAYED definition Lisa Wang
2026-04-08 17:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/7] mm: memory_failure: Generalize extra_pins handling to all MF_DELAYED cases Lisa Wang
2026-04-08 17:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 5/7] mm: selftests: Add shmem into memory failure test Lisa Wang
2026-04-08 17:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 6/7] KVM: selftests: Add memory failure tests in guest_memfd_test Lisa Wang
2026-04-08 17:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 7/7] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd behavior with respect to stage 2 page tables Lisa Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260408-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-rfc-v3-v3-1-718f45eb7c75@google.com \
    --to=wyihan@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox