From: <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
To: <hughd@google.com>
Cc: <hughd@google.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<david@kernel.org>, <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
<wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn>, <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>,
<michel@lespinasse.org>, <ljs@kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ksm: Optimize rmap_walk_ksm by passing a suitable address range
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 14:21:41 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260407142141059pWDasxUAknP5rqvAMl28K@zte.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9950c6c1-f960-58c0-4312-e4f5ac122043@google.com>
> > From the current implementation of mremap, before it succeeds, it always calls
> > prep_move_vma() -> madvise(MADV_UNMERGEABLE) -> break_ksm(), which splits KSM pages
> > into regular anonymous pages, which appears to be based on a patch you introduced
> > over a decade ago, 1ff829957316(ksm: prevent mremap move poisoning). Given this,
> > KSM pages should already be broken prior to the move, so they wouldn't remain as
> > mergeable pages after mremap. Could there be a scenario where this breaking mechanism
> > is bypassed, or am I missing a subtlety in the sequence of operations?
>
> I'd completely forgotten that patch by now! But it's dealing with a
> different issue; and note how it's intentionally leaving MADV_MERGEABLE
> on the vma itself, just using MADV_UNMERGEABLE (with &dummy) as an
> interface to CoW the KSM pages at that time, letting them be remerged after.
>
> The sequence in my testcase was:
>
> boot with mem=1G
> echo 1 >/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run
> base = mmap(NULL, 3*PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
> madvise(base, 3*PAGE_SIZE, MADV_MERGEABLE);
> madvise(base, 3*PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTFORK); /* in case system() used */
> memset(base, 0x77, 2*PAGE_SIZE);
> sleep(1); /* I think not required */
> mremap(base + PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE,
> MREMAP_MAYMOVE|MREMAP_FIXED, base + 2*PAGE_SIZE);
> base2 = mmap(NULL, 512K, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
> madvise(base2, 512K, MADV_DONTFORK); /* in case system() used */
> memset(base2, 0x77, 512K);
> print pages_shared pages_sharing /* 1 1 expected, 1 1 seen */
> run something to mmap 1G anon, touch all, touch again, exit
> print pages_shared pages_sharing /* 0 0 expected, 1 1 seen */
> exit
>
> Those base2 lines were a late addition, to get the test without mremap
> showing 0 0 instead of 1 1 at the end; just as I had to apply that
> pte_mkold-without-folio_mark_accessed patch to the kernel's mm/ksm.c.
>
> Originally I was checking the testcase's /proc/pid/smaps manually
> before exit; then found printing pages_shared pages_sharing easier.
>
> Hugh
Following the idea from your test case, I wrote a similar test program,
using migration instead of swap to trigger reverse mapping. The results
show that pages after mremap can still be successfully migrated.
See my testcase:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260407140805858ViqJKFhfmYSfq0FynsaEY@zte.com.cn/
Therefore, I suspect that the reason your test program did not swap out
the pages might lie elsewhere, rather than being caused by this optimization.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-12 11:28 [PATCH v3 0/2] KSM: Optimizations for rmap_walk_ksm xu.xin16
2026-02-12 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ksm: Initialize the addr only once in rmap_walk_ksm xu.xin16
2026-02-12 11:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ksm: Optimize rmap_walk_ksm by passing a suitable address range xu.xin16
2026-02-12 12:21 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-05 4:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2026-04-05 21:01 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-07 9:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-04-07 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-08 6:29 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-04-06 1:58 ` xu.xin16
2026-04-06 5:35 ` Hugh Dickins
2026-04-07 6:21 ` xu.xin16 [this message]
2026-04-07 9:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-04-08 12:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-06 9:21 ` David Hildenbrand (arm)
2026-04-06 9:23 ` David Hildenbrand (arm)
2026-04-07 9:39 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260407142141059pWDasxUAknP5rqvAMl28K@zte.com.cn \
--to=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=michel@lespinasse.org \
--cc=wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn \
--cc=yang.yang29@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox