From: Kairui Song via B4 Relay <devnull+kasong.tencent.com@kernel.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>,
Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
Leno Hou <lenohou@gmail.com>, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Zicheng Wang <wangzicheng@honor.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/14] mm/mglru: rename variables related to aging and rotation
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 19:57:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260407-mglru-reclaim-v4-2-98cf3dc69519@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260407-mglru-reclaim-v4-0-98cf3dc69519@tencent.com>
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
The current variable name isn't helpful. Make the variable names more
meaningful.
Only naming change, no behavior change.
Suggested-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index adc07501a137..f336f89a2de6 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4934,7 +4934,7 @@ static bool should_run_aging(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq,
*/
static long get_nr_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swappiness)
{
- bool success;
+ bool need_aging;
unsigned long nr_to_scan;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
DEFINE_MAX_SEQ(lruvec);
@@ -4942,7 +4942,7 @@ static long get_nr_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int s
if (mem_cgroup_below_min(sc->target_mem_cgroup, memcg))
return -1;
- success = should_run_aging(lruvec, max_seq, swappiness, &nr_to_scan);
+ need_aging = should_run_aging(lruvec, max_seq, swappiness, &nr_to_scan);
/* try to scrape all its memory if this memcg was deleted */
if (nr_to_scan && !mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
@@ -4951,7 +4951,7 @@ static long get_nr_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int s
nr_to_scan = apply_proportional_protection(memcg, sc, nr_to_scan);
/* try to get away with not aging at the default priority */
- if (!success || sc->priority == DEF_PRIORITY)
+ if (!need_aging || sc->priority == DEF_PRIORITY)
return nr_to_scan >> sc->priority;
/* stop scanning this lruvec as it's low on cold folios */
@@ -5040,7 +5040,7 @@ static bool try_to_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
static int shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
{
- bool success;
+ bool need_rotate;
unsigned long scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
unsigned long reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
@@ -5058,7 +5058,7 @@ static int shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_LOW);
}
- success = try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+ need_rotate = try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg, sc->priority);
@@ -5068,10 +5068,10 @@ static int shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
flush_reclaim_state(sc);
- if (success && mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
+ if (need_rotate && mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
return MEMCG_LRU_YOUNG;
- if (!success && lruvec_is_sizable(lruvec, sc))
+ if (!need_rotate && lruvec_is_sizable(lruvec, sc))
return 0;
/* one retry if offlined or too small */
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 11:57 [PATCH v4 00/14] mm/mglru: improve reclaim loop and dirty folio handling Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] mm/mglru: consolidate common code for retrieving evictable size Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-07 11:57 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay [this message]
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] mm/mglru: relocate the LRU scan batch limit to callers Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-08 3:12 ` Chen Ridong
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] mm/mglru: restructure the reclaim loop Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-08 8:08 ` Chen Ridong
2026-04-08 8:43 ` Kairui Song
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] mm/mglru: scan and count the exact number of folios Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-08 8:27 ` Chen Ridong
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] mm/mglru: use a smaller batch for reclaim Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] mm/mglru: don't abort scan immediately right after aging Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-08 9:32 ` Chen Ridong
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] mm/mglru: remove redundant swap constrained check upon isolation Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] mm/mglru: use the common routine for dirty/writeback reactivation Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] mm/mglru: simplify and improve dirty writeback handling Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] mm/mglru: remove no longer used reclaim argument for folio protection Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] mm/vmscan: remove sc->file_taken Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] mm/vmscan: remove sc->unqueued_dirty Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-07 11:57 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] mm/vmscan: unify writeback reclaim statistic and throttling Kairui Song via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260407-mglru-reclaim-v4-2-98cf3dc69519@tencent.com \
--to=devnull+kasong.tencent.com@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=lenohou@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stevensd@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
--cc=wangzicheng@honor.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox