linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aditya Sharma <adi.sharma@zohomail.in>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
	surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Aditya Sharma <adi.sharma@zohomail.in>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm/memory: update stale locking comments for fault handlers
Date: Sun,  5 Apr 2026 22:48:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260405171834.15971-1-adi.sharma@zohomail.in> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331142936.229667-1-adi.sharma@zohomail.in>

Update the comments for wp_page_copy(), do_wp_page(), do_swap_page(),
do_anonymous_page(), __do_fault(), do_fault(), handle_pte_fault(),
__handle_mm_fault(), and handle_mm_fault() to concisely clarify that
they can be entered holding either the mmap_lock or the VMA lock,
and that the lock may be released upon returning VM_FAULT_RETRY.

Additionally, make the following corrections:
- In do_anonymous_page(), correct the outdated claim that the function
  is entered with the PTE "mapped but not yet locked". Since
  handle_pte_fault() unmaps the empty PTE before routing to
  do_pte_missing(), the comment now correctly states it is entered
  with the PTE unmapped and unlocked.
- In __do_fault(), update the stale reference from __lock_page_retry()
  to __folio_lock_or_retry().

Signed-off-by: Aditya Sharma <adi.sharma@zohomail.in>
---
v2:
- Simplified the comment to concisely state "either the VMA lock or 
  the mmap_lock" instead of a verbose explanation (per David Hildenbrand).
- Expanded the scope to cover 8 other fault handlers in mm/memory.c 
  that suffered from the same stale mmap_lock comments.
- Fixed an additional historical inaccuracy in do_anonymous_page() 
  regarding the PTE mapping state on entry.
- Updated a stale reference in __do_fault() from __lock_page_retry() 
  to __folio_lock_or_retry().


 mm/memory.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index c65e82c86..2b407e3f9 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3742,8 +3742,8 @@ vm_fault_t __vmf_anon_prepare(struct vm_fault *vmf)
  * Handle the case of a page which we actually need to copy to a new page,
  * either due to COW or unsharing.
  *
- * Called with mmap_lock locked and the old page referenced, but
- * without the ptl held.
+ * Called with either the VMA lock or the mmap_lock (FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK
+ * tells you which) and the old page referenced, but without the ptl held.
  *
  * High level logic flow:
  *
@@ -4142,9 +4142,9 @@ static bool wp_can_reuse_anon_folio(struct folio *folio,
  * though the page will change only once the write actually happens. This
  * avoids a few races, and potentially makes it more efficient.
  *
- * We enter with non-exclusive mmap_lock (to exclude vma changes,
- * but allow concurrent faults), with pte both mapped and locked.
- * We return with mmap_lock still held, but pte unmapped and unlocked.
+ * We enter with either the VMA lock or the mmap_lock (FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK
+ * tells you which), and pte both mapped and locked. We return with 
+ * the same lock still held, but pte unmapped and unlocked.
  */
 static vm_fault_t do_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	__releases(vmf->ptl)
@@ -4696,11 +4696,11 @@ static void check_swap_exclusive(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
 }
 
 /*
- * We enter with non-exclusive mmap_lock (to exclude vma changes,
- * but allow concurrent faults), and pte mapped but not yet locked.
+ * We enter with either the VMA lock or the mmap_lock (FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK
+ * tells you which), and pte mapped but not yet locked.
  * We return with pte unmapped and unlocked.
  *
- * We return with the mmap_lock locked or unlocked in the same cases
+ * We return with the lock locked or unlocked in the same cases
  * as does filemap_fault().
  */
 vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
@@ -5210,9 +5210,10 @@ static struct folio *alloc_anon_folio(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 }
 
 /*
- * We enter with non-exclusive mmap_lock (to exclude vma changes,
- * but allow concurrent faults), and pte mapped but not yet locked.
- * We return with mmap_lock still held, but pte unmapped and unlocked.
+ * We enter with either the VMA lock or the mmap_lock (FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK
+ * tells you which), and pte unmapped and unlocked. 
+ * We return with the lock still held, but pte unmapped and unlocked.
+ * If VM_FAULT_RETRY is returned, the lock may have been released.
  */
 static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
@@ -5330,9 +5331,10 @@ static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 }
 
 /*
- * The mmap_lock must have been held on entry, and may have been
- * released depending on flags and vma->vm_ops->fault() return value.
- * See filemap_fault() and __lock_page_retry().
+ * Either the VMA lock or the mmap_lock must have been held on entry, 
+ * and may have been released depending on flags and vma->vm_ops->fault() 
+ * return value.
+ * See filemap_fault() and __folio_lock_or_retry().
  */
 static vm_fault_t __do_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
@@ -5893,11 +5895,11 @@ static vm_fault_t do_shared_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 }
 
 /*
- * We enter with non-exclusive mmap_lock (to exclude vma changes,
- * but allow concurrent faults).
- * The mmap_lock may have been released depending on flags and our
+ * We enter with either the VMA lock or the mmap_lock (FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK
+ * tells you which).
+ * The lock may have been released depending on flags and our
  * return value.  See filemap_fault() and __folio_lock_or_retry().
- * If mmap_lock is released, vma may become invalid (for example
+ * If the lock is released, vma may become invalid (for example
  * by other thread calling munmap()).
  */
 static vm_fault_t do_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
@@ -6264,10 +6266,11 @@ static void fix_spurious_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf,
  * with external mmu caches can use to update those (ie the Sparc or
  * PowerPC hashed page tables that act as extended TLBs).
  *
- * We enter with non-exclusive mmap_lock (to exclude vma changes, but allow
- * concurrent faults).
+ * On entry, we hold either the VMA lock or the mmap_lock
+ * (FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK tells you which).
  *
- * The mmap_lock may have been released depending on flags and our return value.
+ * The mmap_lock or VMA lock may have been released depending on flags 
+ * and our return value.
  * See filemap_fault() and __folio_lock_or_retry().
  */
 static vm_fault_t handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
@@ -6349,7 +6352,7 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 /*
  * On entry, we hold either the VMA lock or the mmap_lock
  * (FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK tells you which).  If VM_FAULT_RETRY is set in
- * the result, the mmap_lock is not held on exit.  See filemap_fault()
+ * the result, the lock is not held on exit.  See filemap_fault()
  * and __folio_lock_or_retry().
  */
 static vm_fault_t __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
@@ -6583,7 +6586,7 @@ static vm_fault_t sanitize_fault_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
  * By the time we get here, we already hold either the VMA lock or the
  * mmap_lock (FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK tells you which).
  *
- * The mmap_lock may have been released depending on flags and our
+ * The lock may have been released depending on flags and our
  * return value.  See filemap_fault() and __folio_lock_or_retry().
  */
 vm_fault_t handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
-- 
2.34.1



      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-05 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31 14:29 [PATCH] mm: update stale locking comment in do_anonymous_page() Aditya Sharma
2026-04-01 10:52 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-01 16:42   ` Aditya Sharma
2026-04-01 18:47     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-05 17:18 ` Aditya Sharma [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260405171834.15971-1-adi.sharma@zohomail.in \
    --to=adi.sharma@zohomail.in \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox