linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kairui Song via B4 Relay <devnull+kasong.tencent.com@kernel.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>,  Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	 Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
	 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,  Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>,
	 Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
	Leno Hou <lenohou@gmail.com>,  Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
	Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
	 Zicheng Wang <wangzicheng@honor.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>,  Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	 Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/14] mm/mglru: remove no longer used reclaim argument for folio protection
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 02:53:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403-mglru-reclaim-v3-11-a285efd6ff91@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403-mglru-reclaim-v3-0-a285efd6ff91@tencent.com>

From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>

Now dirty reclaim folios are handled after isolation, not before,
since dirty reactivation must take the folio off LRU first, and that
helps to unify the dirty handling logic.

So this argument is no longer needed. Just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index bd2bf45826de..9bd0a3b94855 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3220,7 +3220,7 @@ static int folio_update_gen(struct folio *folio, int gen)
 }
 
 /* protect pages accessed multiple times through file descriptors */
-static int folio_inc_gen(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, bool reclaiming)
+static int folio_inc_gen(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio)
 {
 	int type = folio_is_file_lru(folio);
 	struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
@@ -3239,9 +3239,6 @@ static int folio_inc_gen(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, bool reclai
 
 		new_flags = old_flags & ~(LRU_GEN_MASK | LRU_REFS_FLAGS);
 		new_flags |= (new_gen + 1UL) << LRU_GEN_PGOFF;
-		/* for folio_end_writeback() */
-		if (reclaiming)
-			new_flags |= BIT(PG_reclaim);
 	} while (!try_cmpxchg(&folio->flags.f, &old_flags, new_flags));
 
 	lru_gen_update_size(lruvec, folio, old_gen, new_gen);
@@ -3855,7 +3852,7 @@ static bool inc_min_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, int swappiness)
 			VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_is_file_lru(folio) != type, folio);
 			VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_zonenum(folio) != zone, folio);
 
-			new_gen = folio_inc_gen(lruvec, folio, false);
+			new_gen = folio_inc_gen(lruvec, folio);
 			list_move_tail(&folio->lru, &lrugen->folios[new_gen][type][zone]);
 
 			/* don't count the workingset being lazily promoted */
@@ -4607,7 +4604,7 @@ static bool sort_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct scan_c
 
 	/* protected */
 	if (tier > tier_idx || refs + workingset == BIT(LRU_REFS_WIDTH) + 1) {
-		gen = folio_inc_gen(lruvec, folio, false);
+		gen = folio_inc_gen(lruvec, folio);
 		list_move(&folio->lru, &lrugen->folios[gen][type][zone]);
 
 		/* don't count the workingset being lazily promoted */
@@ -4622,7 +4619,7 @@ static bool sort_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct scan_c
 
 	/* ineligible */
 	if (zone > sc->reclaim_idx) {
-		gen = folio_inc_gen(lruvec, folio, false);
+		gen = folio_inc_gen(lruvec, folio);
 		list_move_tail(&folio->lru, &lrugen->folios[gen][type][zone]);
 		return true;
 	}

-- 
2.53.0




  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-02 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-02 18:53 [PATCH v3 00/14] mm/mglru: improve reclaim loop and dirty folio handling Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] mm/mglru: consolidate common code for retrieving evictable size Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-03  3:16   ` Kairui Song
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] mm/mglru: rename variables related to aging and rotation Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] mm/mglru: relocate the LRU scan batch limit to callers Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] mm/mglru: restructure the reclaim loop Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-03  4:44   ` Kairui Song
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] mm/mglru: scan and count the exact number of folios Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] mm/mglru: use a smaller batch for reclaim Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-03  7:50   ` Barry Song
2026-04-03  9:09     ` Kairui Song
2026-04-03  9:25       ` Barry Song
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] mm/mglru: don't abort scan immediately right after aging Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] mm/mglru: remove redundant swap constrained check upon isolation Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] mm/mglru: use the common routine for dirty/writeback reactivation Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-03  5:00   ` Kairui Song
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] mm/mglru: simplify and improve dirty writeback handling Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-02 18:53 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay [this message]
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] mm/vmscan: remove sc->file_taken Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] mm/vmscan: remove sc->unqueued_dirty Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-02 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] mm/vmscan: unify writeback reclaim statistic and throttling Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-04-03 21:15   ` Axel Rasmussen
2026-04-04 18:36     ` Kairui Song
2026-04-07  6:27   ` Baolin Wang
2026-04-03 21:26 ` [PATCH v3 00/14] mm/mglru: improve reclaim loop and dirty folio handling Axel Rasmussen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260403-mglru-reclaim-v3-11-a285efd6ff91@tencent.com \
    --to=devnull+kasong.tencent.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenohou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=stevensd@google.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangzicheng@honor.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox