From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jackie Liu <liu.yun@linux.dev>
Cc: joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, gourry@gourry.net, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>,
Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/mempolicy: fix memory leaks in weighted_interleave_auto_store()
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 20:43:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331204356.bbc585801a40bbad07ff52c0@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401005702.7096-1-liu.yun@linux.dev>
On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 08:57:02 +0800 Jackie Liu <liu.yun@linux.dev> wrote:
> From: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
>
> weighted_interleave_auto_store() fetches old_wi_state inside the
> if (!input) block only. This causes two memory leaks:
>
> 1. When a user writes "false" and the current mode is already manual,
> the function returns early without freeing the freshly allocated
> new_wi_state.
>
> 2. When a user writes "true", old_wi_state stays NULL because the
> fetch is skipped entirely. The old state is then overwritten by
> rcu_assign_pointer() but never freed, since the cleanup path is
> gated on old_wi_state being non-NULL. A user can trigger this
> repeatedly by writing "1" in a loop.
>
> Fix both leaks by moving the old_wi_state fetch before the input
> check, making it unconditional. This also allows a unified early
> return for both "true" and "false" when the requested mode matches
> the current mode.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.16+
> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260331100740.84906-1-liu.yun@linux.dev
> Fixes: e341f9c3c841 ("mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning")
> Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn>
Thanks.
> Changes in v2:
> - Move old_wi_state fetch unconditionally before the input check,
> instead of just adding kfree() to the early return path
> - Also fix an additional memory leak when writing "true" where the
> previous wi_state was never freed (Sashiko)
Yes, this has changed a lot since v1, so your removal of the three
Reviewed-by:s is appropriate.
mm/mempolicy.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mm-mempolicy-fix-memory-leaks-in-weighted_interleave_auto_store
+++ a/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -3700,18 +3700,19 @@ static ssize_t weighted_interleave_auto_
new_wi_state->iw_table[i] = 1;
mutex_lock(&wi_state_lock);
- if (!input) {
- old_wi_state = rcu_dereference_protected(wi_state,
- lockdep_is_held(&wi_state_lock));
- if (!old_wi_state)
- goto update_wi_state;
- if (input == old_wi_state->mode_auto) {
- mutex_unlock(&wi_state_lock);
- return count;
- }
+ old_wi_state = rcu_dereference_protected(wi_state,
+ lockdep_is_held(&wi_state_lock));
+
+ if (old_wi_state && input == old_wi_state->mode_auto) {
+ mutex_unlock(&wi_state_lock);
+ kfree(new_wi_state);
+ return count;
+ }
- memcpy(new_wi_state->iw_table, old_wi_state->iw_table,
- nr_node_ids * sizeof(u8));
+ if (!input) {
+ if (old_wi_state)
+ memcpy(new_wi_state->iw_table, old_wi_state->iw_table,
+ nr_node_ids * sizeof(u8));
goto update_wi_state;
}
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 0:57 Jackie Liu
2026-04-01 3:43 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-04-01 14:56 ` Joshua Hahn
2026-04-02 9:04 ` Donet Tom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331204356.bbc585801a40bbad07ff52c0@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liu.yun@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox