From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8626910AB82A for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 23:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DDBAB6B0005; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D8C4F6B0089; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:06:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CA1FC6B0092; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:06:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4706B0005 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D91913C239 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 23:06:22 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84589749804.01.6C45799 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1AF2000C for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 23:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=xbJcYva3; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 172.234.252.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1774566380; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=WHn1kJK+YODkE/CYsDOxyUtITJkveYKHgvR6OOWui1I=; b=H4Jn20btuUcZDmWUGEnApoaOUgQYEjLkaT0WSR9ah2eqqnFGeKeAvWP1YpgShziOWcpeTS E87ud24wRhigNmb9GRkywT+MZYXRoGDimZVCvXQPUnwTAvo+qMxfipuetyiT+ClabvlgaF 3cYqIe5c7RA0n51a5dBct1Tf57Gke8o= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1774566380; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mWlPo7SKbygAopKG//G/dmuCwVDsbsofr2aUUR5lQb8jCPxc0rtGC7xNQzsahT+lb4aDBz Ncgi08TbPHq9VpGTyNAxQVhIGmRt4razUB9MKYJEwdL+un8r/zcNwp+LXa6PYaKmzISB2p E+Nc/YtQc8zgE78EknAuBXocRC5URO4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=xbJcYva3; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 172.234.252.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7192D437F4; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 23:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9027C116C6; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 23:06:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1774566379; bh=TiOzKubtC0x7gm/4SO+ovQWMDQuf7zUlSRKrpYigxp8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xbJcYva3zKWn/jvCOQ8ntfYtZxyKmF1BDjzvRzCuOLUQxJk1HJWv/qnN1gduM4kcE 5pThj/pGnC/4rUxXub9eEXfIvnlyN2QA2czGMqfDsDg5/Att3Msob4Fz1riEQ+wxBS vbcPZVtGunBxBoZe06YsmD7oDKvRCVNsKYz55x+8= Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:06:18 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Li Wang Cc: yosry@kernel.org, nphamcs@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, mkoutny@suse.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, longman@redhat.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] selftests/cgroup: improve zswap tests robustness and support large page sizes Message-Id: <20260326160618.18a20227b606bc95f3c3cfa6@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260326032658.96819-1-liwang@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AA1AF2000C X-Stat-Signature: ipn6tosc5g3fdmr7t1fe5qf1396ayu6r X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-HE-Tag: 1774566380-971055 X-HE-Meta: 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 PMY/gnKW KkR1RwxdeFKOBLfBhLvF8WpJs7PLGh2rA+ccajLVyakqE4p6TZq1QCXF2EvBaq2sBTctElY+PNEcmnikO7cFUU35sZ9NXJByF9jjk/gghjGKpl1vd9HLzzget37vUhLT8XN2X/3AtLCzxh92avwuZnJJLd6cfJ7zlxgnHDwMxiQ3U3pbJHz4fa719cBgYzgZOdb3CX6bLj59CaJvXAnuR9wfV7gpFFRGl//P/A8KO9f17HEDCe8q+fJwbNio+3YROLv1d6cfEL3iJlCT5rR3v3U4Z60YsHesuBivdrviq1ndYeqs+JJE6nULOxyRKdIVNQjfgszXbiD5nAc4= Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 26 Mar 2026 14:29:20 +0800 Li Wang wrote: > > Test all passed on: > > x86_64(4k), aarch64(4K, 64K), ppc64le(64K). > > Hi Andrew, All, > > I see that Sashiko still points out minor issues in this patchset, > That seems very tiny in selftest programming. > > I can correct all that in a new version if you'd like a perfect patchset. > > Sashiko comments: > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260326032658.96819-1-liwang%40redhat.com Ah, OK, you already looked. If you say they're too minor then I'm OK with that. If there are any you feel you'd like to address then go for it. That's my opinion, others might differ! I suggest you leave things as-is for a while (a week?), give the memcg maintainers time to take a look (please). Thanks.