From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 05/11] mm/huge_memory: remove folio split check for READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 15:06:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260323190644.1714379-6-ziy@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323190644.1714379-1-ziy@nvidia.com>
Without READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS, large file-backed folios cannot be created by
a FS without large folio support. The check is no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 22 ----------------------
1 file changed, 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index de4a1e6ce376..c7680787409c 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3710,28 +3710,6 @@ int folio_check_splittable(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
/* order-1 is not supported for anonymous THP. */
if (new_order == 1)
return -EINVAL;
- } else if (split_type == SPLIT_TYPE_NON_UNIFORM || new_order) {
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS) &&
- !mapping_large_folio_support(folio->mapping)) {
- /*
- * We can always split a folio down to a single page
- * (new_order == 0) uniformly.
- *
- * For any other scenario
- * a) uniform split targeting a large folio
- * (new_order > 0)
- * b) any non-uniform split
- * we must confirm that the file system supports large
- * folios.
- *
- * Note that we might still have THPs in such
- * mappings, which is created from khugepaged when
- * CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS is enabled. But in that
- * case, the mapping does not actually support large
- * folios properly.
- */
- return -EINVAL;
- }
}
/*
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-23 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 19:06 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Zi Yan
2026-03-23 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Kconfig option Zi Yan
2026-03-23 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] mm/khugepaged: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS code in collapse_file() Zi Yan
2026-03-23 19:41 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-23 19:47 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-23 19:53 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-23 19:59 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-23 20:13 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-23 20:24 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-23 21:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-23 21:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-23 21:11 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-23 21:21 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-24 0:12 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-24 13:15 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-23 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] mm: remove filemap_nr_thps*() functions Zi Yan
2026-03-23 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] mm/huge_memory: remove file_thp_enabled() and its caller Zi Yan
2026-03-23 19:06 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2026-03-23 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] mm/truncate: use folio_split() in truncate_inode_partial_folio() Zi Yan
2026-03-23 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] fs: remove nr_thp from struct address_space Zi Yan
2026-03-23 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] fs: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS code Zi Yan
2026-03-23 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] fs/btrfs: remove a comment referring to READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Zi Yan
2026-03-23 19:47 ` David Sterba
2026-03-23 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] selftests/mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS test in khugepaged Zi Yan
2026-03-23 21:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-24 9:04 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-24 11:14 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-23 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] selftests/mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS test in guard-regions Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260323190644.1714379-6-ziy@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox