From: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rientjes@google.com, seanjc@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
vannapurve@google.com, michael.roth@amd.com,
jiaqiyan@google.com, tabba@google.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 0/7] mm: Fix MF_DELAYED handling on memory failure
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 23:30:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260319-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-rfc-v2-v2-0-92c596402a7a@google.com> (raw)
Here's a second revision to fix MF_DELAYED handling on memory failure.
This patch series addresses an issue in the memory failure handling path
where MF_DELAYED is incorrectly treated as an error. This issue was
discovered while testing memory failure handling for guest_memfd.
The proposed solution involves -
1. Clarifying the definition of MF_DELAYED to mean that memory failure
handling is only partially completed, and that the metadata for the
memory that failed (as in struct page/folio) is still referenced.
2. Updating shmem’s handling to align with the clarified definition.
3. Updating how the result of .error_remove_folio() is interpreted.
RFC v2 is a more complete solution that includes parts 1 and 2 above to
address David’s comment [1]. Selftests are included for all the above.
+ RFC v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1760551864.git.wyihan@google.com/
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/91dbea57-d5b0-49b7-8920-3a2d252c46b0@redhat.com/
Signed-off-by: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
---
Lisa Wang (7):
mm: memory_failure: Clarify the MF_DELAYED definition
mm: memory_failure: Allow truncate_error_folio to return MF_DELAYED
mm: shmem: Update shmem handler to the MF_DELAYED definition
mm: memory_failure: Generalize extra_pins handling to all MF_DELAYED cases
mm: selftests: Add shmem memory failure test
KVM: selftests: Add memory failure tests in guest_memfd_test
KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd behavior with respect to stage 2 page tables
mm/memory-failure.c | 17 +-
mm/shmem.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 233 +++++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 3 +
tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 1 +
.../selftests/mm/shmem_memory_failure_test.c | 98 +++++++++
6 files changed, 344 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 1f318b96cc84d7c2ab792fcc0bfd42a7ca890681
change-id: 20260319-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-rfc-v2-5ee11d6a7260
Best regards,
--
Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 23:30 Lisa Wang [this message]
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/7] mm: memory_failure: Clarify the MF_DELAYED definition Lisa Wang
2026-03-22 21:34 ` Jiaqi Yan
2026-03-23 21:18 ` Lisa Wang
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/7] mm: memory_failure: Allow truncate_error_folio to return MF_DELAYED Lisa Wang
2026-03-30 7:02 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-04-03 22:31 ` Lisa Wang
2026-04-07 3:55 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/7] mm: shmem: Update shmem handler to the MF_DELAYED definition Lisa Wang
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/7] mm: memory_failure: Generalize extra_pins handling to all MF_DELAYED cases Lisa Wang
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/7] mm: selftests: Add shmem memory failure test Lisa Wang
2026-03-21 6:30 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-24 0:43 ` Lisa Wang
2026-03-24 12:36 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-28 0:40 ` Lisa Wang
2026-03-30 7:12 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/7] KVM: selftests: Add memory failure tests in guest_memfd_test Lisa Wang
2026-03-30 7:20 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 7/7] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd behavior with respect to stage 2 page tables Lisa Wang
2026-03-20 2:39 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/7] mm: Fix MF_DELAYED handling on memory failure Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260319-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-rfc-v2-v2-0-92c596402a7a@google.com \
--to=wyihan@google.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox