linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lin Ruifeng <linruifeng4@huawei.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <david@kernel.org>, <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	<matthew.brost@intel.com>, <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
	<rakie.kim@sk.com>, <byungchul@sk.com>, <gourry@gourry.net>,
	<ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>, <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	<joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] mm/mempolicy: NUMA mempolicy mismatch during remote access
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 20:04:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260316120424.1535575-1-linruifeng4@huawei.com> (raw)

I'd like to report an issue in the SVA I/O Page Fault (IOPF) handling path:
a NUMA memory policy mismatch caused by deferred workqueue processing.

When hardware triggers a page fault via the IOMMU SVA mechanism, it's handled
asynchronously by a kworker thread. Although the fault handler correctly uses
the original process's mm_struct for address space mapping, the physical page
allocation (e.g., in do_anonymous_page()) still depends on current->mempolicy.

Since current here is the kworker, not the original user process, any
task-level NUMA policy (e.g., set_mempolicy() or numactl --membind) is
completely ignored. Instead, allocation follows the kworker's default policy,
which may run on a different NUMA node.

A similar issue was also discussed in [1]. I was wondering if you might have
any suggestions on how to address this issue.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/e2d5f3a5-f6f1-4567-a162-a0e814292738@asahilina.net/
Signed-off-by: Lin Ruifeng <linruifeng4@huawei.com>
2.43.0



             reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16 12:04 Lin Ruifeng [this message]
2026-03-16 14:07 ` Gregory Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260316120424.1535575-1-linruifeng4@huawei.com \
    --to=linruifeng4@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox