From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] zram: unify and harden algo/priority params handling
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 17:42:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260311084312.1766036-7-senozhatsky@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311084312.1766036-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org>
We have two functions that accept algo= and priority=
params - algorithm_params_store() and recompress_store().
This patch unifies and hardens handling of those
parameters.
There are 4 possible cases:
- only priority= provided [recommended]
We need to verify that provided priority value is
within permitted range for each particular function.
- both algo= and priority= provided
We cannot prioritize one over another. All we should
do is to verify that zram is configured in the way
that user-space expects it to be. Namely that zram
indeed has compressor algo= setup at given priority=.
- only algo= provided [not recommended]
We should lookup priority in compressors list.
- none provided [not recommended]
Just use function's defaults.
Suggested-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 02fb70f35ae8..676b1602d817 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1635,6 +1635,37 @@ static void zram_debugfs_register(struct zram *zram) {};
static void zram_debugfs_unregister(struct zram *zram) {};
#endif
+/* Only algo parameter given, lookup by algo name */
+static int lookup_algo_priority(struct zram *zram, const char *algo,
+ u32 min_prio)
+{
+ s32 prio;
+
+ for (prio = min_prio; prio < ZRAM_MAX_COMPS; prio++) {
+ if (!zram->comp_algs[prio])
+ continue;
+
+ if (!strcmp(zram->comp_algs[prio], algo))
+ return prio;
+ }
+
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+/* Both algo and priority parameters given, validate them */
+static int validate_algo_priority(struct zram *zram, const char *algo, u32 prio)
+{
+ if (prio >= ZRAM_MAX_COMPS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ /* No algo at given priority */
+ if (!zram->comp_algs[prio])
+ return -EINVAL;
+ /* A different algo at given priority */
+ if (strcmp(zram->comp_algs[prio], algo))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void comp_algorithm_set(struct zram *zram, u32 prio, const char *alg)
{
zram->comp_algs[prio] = alg;
@@ -1707,6 +1738,7 @@ static ssize_t algorithm_params_store(struct device *dev,
char *args, *param, *val, *algo = NULL, *dict_path = NULL;
struct deflate_params deflate_params;
struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
+ bool prio_param = false;
int ret;
deflate_params.winbits = ZCOMP_PARAM_NOT_SET;
@@ -1719,6 +1751,7 @@ static ssize_t algorithm_params_store(struct device *dev,
return -EINVAL;
if (!strcmp(param, "priority")) {
+ prio_param = true;
ret = kstrtoint(val, 10, &prio);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -1754,24 +1787,22 @@ static ssize_t algorithm_params_store(struct device *dev,
if (init_done(zram))
return -EBUSY;
- /* Lookup priority by algorithm name */
- if (algo) {
- s32 p;
-
- prio = -EINVAL;
- for (p = ZRAM_PRIMARY_COMP; p < ZRAM_MAX_COMPS; p++) {
- if (!zram->comp_algs[p])
- continue;
+ if (prio_param) {
+ if (prio < ZRAM_PRIMARY_COMP || prio >= ZRAM_MAX_COMPS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
- if (!strcmp(zram->comp_algs[p], algo)) {
- prio = p;
- break;
- }
- }
+ if (algo && prio_param) {
+ ret = validate_algo_priority(zram, algo, prio);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
}
- if (prio < ZRAM_PRIMARY_COMP || prio >= ZRAM_MAX_COMPS)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (algo && !prio_param) {
+ prio = lookup_algo_priority(zram, algo, ZRAM_PRIMARY_COMP);
+ if (prio < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
ret = comp_params_store(zram, prio, level, dict_path, &deflate_params);
return ret ? ret : len;
@@ -2407,9 +2438,6 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *zram, u32 index, struct page *page,
void *src;
int ret = 0;
- if (!zram->comps[prio])
- return -EINVAL;
-
handle_old = get_slot_handle(zram, index);
if (!handle_old)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -2511,10 +2539,11 @@ static ssize_t recompress_store(struct device *dev,
char *args, *param, *val, *algo = NULL;
u64 num_recomp_pages = ULLONG_MAX;
struct zram_pp_ctl *ctl = NULL;
- u32 prio = ZRAM_SECONDARY_COMP;
- struct zram_pp_slot *pps;
+ s32 prio = ZRAM_SECONDARY_COMP;
u32 mode = 0, threshold = 0;
+ struct zram_pp_slot *pps;
struct page *page = NULL;
+ bool prio_param = false;
ssize_t ret;
args = skip_spaces(buf);
@@ -2562,7 +2591,8 @@ static ssize_t recompress_store(struct device *dev,
}
if (!strcmp(param, "priority")) {
- ret = kstrtouint(val, 10, &prio);
+ prio_param = true;
+ ret = kstrtoint(val, 10, &prio);
if (ret)
return ret;
continue;
@@ -2576,30 +2606,26 @@ static ssize_t recompress_store(struct device *dev,
if (!init_done(zram))
return -EINVAL;
- if (algo) {
- bool found = false;
-
- for (; prio < ZRAM_MAX_COMPS; prio++) {
- if (!zram->comp_algs[prio])
- continue;
-
- if (!strcmp(zram->comp_algs[prio], algo)) {
- found = true;
- break;
- }
- }
+ if (prio_param) {
+ if (prio < ZRAM_SECONDARY_COMP || prio >= ZRAM_MAX_COMPS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
- if (!found) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (algo && prio_param) {
+ ret = validate_algo_priority(zram, algo, prio);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
}
- if (prio < ZRAM_SECONDARY_COMP || prio >= ZRAM_MAX_COMPS) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
+ if (algo && !prio_param) {
+ prio = lookup_algo_priority(zram, algo, ZRAM_SECONDARY_COMP);
+ if (prio < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (!zram->comps[prio])
+ return -EINVAL;
+
page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!page) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
--
2.53.0.473.g4a7958ca14-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 8:42 [PATCH v2 0/6] zram: recompression cleanups and tweaks Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-03-11 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] zram: do not permit params change after init Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-03-11 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] zram: do not autocorrect bad recompression parameters Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-03-11 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] zram: drop ->num_active_comps Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-03-11 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] zram: update recompression documentation Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-03-11 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] zram: remove chained recompression Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-03-11 8:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260311084312.1766036-7-senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox