From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC936F55104 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2B3D96B00A2; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 14:58:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 28BB66B00A3; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 14:58:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 160FC6B00A4; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 14:58:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E476B00A2 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 14:58:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2568B662E for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 19:58:18 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84520328676.01.5B03183 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4199160003 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 19:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=PsZQ3g0W; spf=pass (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1772913496; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=0frC3pflUkKX2BrGrk9TXUdtd3fwNbVNAduvnPqztVc=; b=zvhzCsMC0SIqIEyBMWbf0HQkPMiBS7QIA+PnpkSpdbErOA8L6AGKfUEieWQkrG//RMSWGf jNTqie9BZq+fZPHRWdRtkHoIggl11oX0+uzaWYz3pWNlETKKgx64a3N8fegTxfDe8SEidg d4OspOoG1KZUmcBLpXt6nPqjZs5zaRA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=PsZQ3g0W; spf=pass (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1772913496; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=S182NKIDKAW/fwp641YlWr5PqGKo8h4NmDrFHh71aD9t2aK/prxexsiND8gR8HCz2V6I47 O+jYpd1w8/l5O/V+z6aovkFPFZoOLjYqUVs2nBiZ0X9GhR9xScE6E8F8hl/emXapu9POS6 YVZZWrz433TYkj8lNNO/vBZfuj9nyDM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1772913495; x=1804449495; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6EfkCLhJg+AlZw6TkaO6d/504vUAp5tN3HoH1lQUwjY=; b=PsZQ3g0Ww+/LcdZffJdtXzZEhNRB2M3P6KwGOiM7XOSbrEffO4GyQdDK DeyHrVNLGhTI//bQMfqzWsDDVr4o1VSx87+IArJJ9vCPRZjPJiBmyeSQ5 cNqju1LUhP+qJAZzjOzLDPDUa1qA94bqy2rR+drGetF+nPPEh6xjuTb/k 4YgLZLwPwM8NUQNyqTR3XeiqabipVmOwdogADUhY6HZ/2GbLePfk4EMiq Q1itH2nGnTUi0KjmmjaphXZ7ubOo8iX6HUtLHS8FkZ57yWZtCz7nHQ7by kN4X8eWvOIQkU0vAnTgz5iHHLSkC/35aQgd5fogwgRejzMi9XcWySwY8E Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: xHiBlDIdSAGlP8vzXLBKtg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7+Yyh4xaS0CEGOHnLfJaiw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11722"; a="74038492" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,107,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="74038492" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2026 11:58:13 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Wlk16Iu4Q/eU4k+9d912cQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /0+ldayrS5+1d6aZKJqv6g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,107,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="218552919" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 058beb05654c) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa010.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2026 11:58:05 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 058beb05654c with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vyxmj-000000002b5-2cTQ; Sat, 07 Mar 2026 19:58:01 +0000 Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2026 03:57:41 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "JP Kobryn (Meta)" , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, apopple@nvidia.com, axelrasmussen@google.com, byungchul@sk.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, david@kernel.org, eperezma@redhat.com, gourry@gourry.net, jasowang@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, matthew.brost@intel.com, mst@redhat.com, rppt@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, surenb@google.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, weixugc@google.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/mempolicy: track page allocations per mempolicy Message-ID: <202603080349.ya7tIjgk-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260307045520.247998-1-jp.kobryn@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260307045520.247998-1-jp.kobryn@linux.dev> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E4199160003 X-Stat-Signature: 8dfjzz4u8pmizmcodywzq71tbx3n4khg X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1772913494-94631 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1+YBrhQaCwyDORPtzQH5ni4sO5VdDWordBZkEvzkodvjIOWcWiHAIKXH1NvlaWAueTn6wi9AM0+WeAps7CPNd8BQGah1lhTIxnnuWPviEswInMzoQfvnhtaQgnHWNNlI/JHjnsLhGaW4DPacTjXzjJRKTyY78KLtCp+CLkdG5kLCaxx15qpogU0S21VqENlGHnJ0QRpx9emQV+0Hb2veIo01HH0crZ5vVe5rdZnKUEA8aYcBsaZBKpOQUfCYXjRfI44q3N0XnYMVgpCN3o6HpxHyao06jV9dNpL8I1maHqwtJJAD9Ul7BqOAKaJZrAGKj9RbHRZCHgLAJ1HW6X8M6ypMRFXJd83XRWIIlVHnHkAsANfCaYXIr6V6UiGow2p+j7IvpSow4QFUCbvWAb3VDRh6AvdaGbbKXSG1VfDKFJdm2jEYGJQkNwcmNRbcRXg27e7OL0zV0QPrCwAYCcJ8ZZfdSsD6KXSk/itv8bzT1dlV3OGw8q2llkDrxDsPA7hGdw8cb/ei8OnG0wI/fVhxuJ3tBGjsKoYBZvE435Vd5DsuEgKaAoK+V4y8CoFr4q/azTt77hWiXta5qy1CDWq2x72cwllbicwHj/xNI+o+mGA7ENWEmTByDWKbN48eSg7jHK7ci+FVUYicnTLdbiQZ7LBBLvV3s+emsZbI/nMxpf9agRzseCUMna+Eug/r2l4ZmPexJlmpCrXuiaULZeUzUmwMF8S5bTkINHS9VT+8PFlTUUXG9cMBseAASC9zpjlSOMYoaE9AAHJv55psEXvAA18QnUTvBxOu3r4jj3Nmi3Itej4Ml3ApVwKlWt2i0Kgb9ohcgyz/3jYiS0qA12AcebctTCCCZyRX9ULqnDj88msNooPPu4Ah0YgrqjCB2+Vpepnjk3l+j3ljhczzlfPsNW9og0QYQ///OYP+lu3Evh5y10csq5ceSQwDBKuhhABGfnjKiUjmcI IjixYxDE iLd6YZx+OWY/PGzZKZGlLrqm+7fnvj903PFmJfw/vaf17GarOIL1kmTFJb0bKRHRP7ZwPX9BFbH0QPKY329/t47xrXzDi3FHeDTXp9YyBOJWk7Fuc7KSB4vhjyt6s8uc7fXfTxd+MLn81ckmn1C6t84l9qH2+3Mr5xt1LotKCcTlIoi3d11OcbnWkrzPyh19efQ5nKAfZeq+ZC+sVOAAplrTJ4gLZMn3VmO1rkcXp3snTrjlYs1G3YYRH0WD3oNJk3HzU+HLFs+V7vwK19K5Qy7VYKWZuvwrI5qRk/JgLVecraxXHDSNwQ0VRjgWMvdZ7gk2nnZPlWtg59z0wHhmxcUDieZqIP7lDfPGw7ecugWL4zLxNvaW37oPjh0Kr7xDRiBQEH+kmFDB2av3ISmVGbP9w9A== Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi JP, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/JP-Kobryn-Meta/mm-mempolicy-track-page-allocations-per-mempolicy/20260307-125642 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260307045520.247998-1-jp.kobryn%40linux.dev patch subject: [PATCH v2] mm/mempolicy: track page allocations per mempolicy config: arm64-randconfig-001-20260307 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260308/202603080349.ya7tIjgk-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260308/202603080349.ya7tIjgk-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603080349.ya7tIjgk-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/mempolicy.c: In function 'mpol_count_numa_alloc': >> mm/mempolicy.c:2489:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'mem_cgroup_from_task'; did you mean 'perf_cgroup_from_task'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(current); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ perf_cgroup_from_task >> mm/mempolicy.c:2489:8: warning: assignment to 'struct mem_cgroup *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(current); ^ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +2489 mm/mempolicy.c 2429 2430 /* 2431 * Count a mempolicy allocation. Stats are tracked per-node and per-cgroup. 2432 * The following numa_{hit/miss/foreign} pattern is used: 2433 * 2434 * hit 2435 * - for BIND and PREFERRED_MANY, allocation succeeded on node in nodemask 2436 * - for other policies, allocation succeeded on intended node 2437 * - counted on the node of the allocation 2438 * miss 2439 * - allocation intended for other node, but happened on this one 2440 * - counted on other node 2441 * foreign 2442 * - allocation intended on this node, but happened on other node 2443 * - counted on this node 2444 */ 2445 static void mpol_count_numa_alloc(struct mempolicy *pol, int intended_nid, 2446 struct page *page, unsigned int order) 2447 { 2448 int actual_nid = page_to_nid(page); 2449 long nr_pages = 1L << order; 2450 enum node_stat_item hit_idx; 2451 struct mem_cgroup *memcg; 2452 struct lruvec *lruvec; 2453 bool is_hit; 2454 2455 if (!root_mem_cgroup || mem_cgroup_disabled()) 2456 return; 2457 2458 /* 2459 * Start with hit then use +1 or +2 later on to change to miss or 2460 * foreign respectively if needed. 2461 */ 2462 switch (pol->mode) { 2463 case MPOL_PREFERRED: 2464 hit_idx = NUMA_MPOL_PREFERRED_HIT; 2465 break; 2466 case MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY: 2467 hit_idx = NUMA_MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY_HIT; 2468 break; 2469 case MPOL_BIND: 2470 hit_idx = NUMA_MPOL_BIND_HIT; 2471 break; 2472 case MPOL_INTERLEAVE: 2473 hit_idx = NUMA_MPOL_INTERLEAVE_HIT; 2474 break; 2475 case MPOL_WEIGHTED_INTERLEAVE: 2476 hit_idx = NUMA_MPOL_WEIGHTED_INTERLEAVE_HIT; 2477 break; 2478 default: 2479 hit_idx = NUMA_MPOL_LOCAL_HIT; 2480 break; 2481 } 2482 2483 if (pol->mode == MPOL_BIND || pol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY) 2484 is_hit = node_isset(actual_nid, pol->nodes); 2485 else 2486 is_hit = (actual_nid == intended_nid); 2487 2488 rcu_read_lock(); > 2489 memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(current); 2490 2491 if (is_hit) { 2492 lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, NODE_DATA(actual_nid)); 2493 mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, hit_idx, nr_pages); 2494 } else { 2495 /* account for miss on the fallback node */ 2496 lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, NODE_DATA(actual_nid)); 2497 mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, hit_idx + 1, nr_pages); 2498 2499 /* account for foreign on the intended node */ 2500 lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, NODE_DATA(intended_nid)); 2501 mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, hit_idx + 2, nr_pages); 2502 } 2503 2504 rcu_read_unlock(); 2505 } 2506 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki