From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] locking: Wire up contended_release tracepoint
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 10:59:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260305105924.7069eb23@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8298e098d3418cb446ef396f119edac58a3414e9.1772642407.git.d@ilvokhin.com>
On Wed, 4 Mar 2026 16:56:17 +0000
Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com> wrote:
> @@ -204,6 +206,8 @@ static inline void rwbase_write_unlock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb)
> unsigned long flags;
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
> + if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(rtm))
> + trace_contended_release(rwb);
Hmm, if statements should never be used just for tracepoints without a
static branch. The above should be:
if (trace_contended_release_enabled() && rt_mutex_has_waiters(rtm))
trace_contended_release(rwb);
The above "trace_contened_release_enabled()" is a static_branch where it
turns the if statement into a nop when the tracepoint is not enabled, and a
jmp when it is.
> __rwbase_write_unlock(rwb, WRITER_BIAS, flags);
> }
>
> @@ -213,6 +217,8 @@ static inline void rwbase_write_downgrade(struct rwbase_rt *rwb)
> unsigned long flags;
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
> + if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(rtm))
> + trace_contended_release(rwb);
Same here.
-- Steve
> /* Release it and account current as reader */
> __rwbase_write_unlock(rwb, WRITER_BIAS - 1, flags);
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> index 24df4d98f7d2..4e61dc0bb045 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> @@ -1360,6 +1360,7 @@ static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> if (unlikely((tmp & (RWSEM_LOCK_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) ==
> RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) {
> clear_nonspinnable(sem);
> + trace_contended_release(sem);
> rwsem_wake(sem);
> }
> preempt_enable();
> @@ -1383,8 +1384,10 @@ static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> preempt_disable();
> rwsem_clear_owner(sem);
> tmp = atomic_long_fetch_add_release(-RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED, &sem->count);
> - if (unlikely(tmp & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS))
> + if (unlikely(tmp & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) {
> + trace_contended_release(sem);
> rwsem_wake(sem);
> + }
> preempt_enable();
> }
>
> @@ -1407,8 +1410,10 @@ static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> tmp = atomic_long_fetch_add_release(
> -RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED+RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
> rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
> - if (tmp & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)
> + if (tmp & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS) {
> + trace_contended_release(sem);
> rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
> + }
> preempt_enable();
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c
> index 3ef032e22f7e..3cef5ba88f7e 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c
> @@ -231,8 +231,10 @@ void __sched up(struct semaphore *sem)
> else
> __up(sem, &wake_q);
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
> - if (!wake_q_empty(&wake_q))
> + if (!wake_q_empty(&wake_q)) {
> + trace_contended_release(sem);
> wake_up_q(&wake_q);
> + }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(up);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-04 16:56 [PATCH RFC 0/3] locking: contended_release tracepoint instrumentation Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] locking: Add contended_release tracepoint Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 22:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-03-04 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] locking/percpu-rwsem: Extract __percpu_up_read_slowpath() Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 22:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-05 15:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-03-05 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-04 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] locking: Wire up contended_release tracepoint Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-05 15:59 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2026-03-05 17:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-05 18:06 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260305105924.7069eb23@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox