From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] locking: Add contended_release tracepoint
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 07:55:52 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260305075552.0840e6b107dd9560e09e4f86@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f8605471fd84ebff963c011aa98f79ed17f493c7.1772642407.git.d@ilvokhin.com>
On Wed, 4 Mar 2026 16:56:15 +0000
Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com> wrote:
> Add the contended_release trace event. This tracepoint fires on the
> holder side when a contended lock is released, complementing the
> existing contention_begin/contention_end tracepoints which fire on the
> waiter side.
>
> This enables correlating lock hold time under contention with waiter
> events by lock address. Subsequent patches wire this tracepoint into
> the individual lock implementations.
>
OK, but I don't recommend you to split the traceevent definition
and its usage. Could you combine [1/3] and [3/3], so that we can
understand why this event is introduced and where it is recorded
by checking one commit?
Thank you,
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/lock.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/lock.h b/include/trace/events/lock.h
> index 8e89baa3775f..4f28e41977ec 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/lock.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/lock.h
> @@ -138,6 +138,23 @@ TRACE_EVENT(contention_end,
> TP_printk("%p (ret=%d)", __entry->lock_addr, __entry->ret)
> );
>
> +TRACE_EVENT(contended_release,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(void *lock),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(lock),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(void *, lock_addr)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->lock_addr = lock;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("%p", __entry->lock_addr)
> +);
> +
> #endif /* _TRACE_LOCK_H */
>
> /* This part must be outside protection */
> --
> 2.47.3
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-04 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-04 16:56 [PATCH RFC 0/3] locking: contended_release tracepoint instrumentation Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] locking: Add contended_release tracepoint Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 22:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2026-03-04 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] locking/percpu-rwsem: Extract __percpu_up_read_slowpath() Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-03-04 22:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-04 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] locking: Wire up contended_release tracepoint Dmitry Ilvokhin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260305075552.0840e6b107dd9560e09e4f86@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox