* Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate_device: fix folio refcount leak on folio_split_unmapped failure
2026-03-04 12:01 [PATCH] mm/migrate_device: fix folio refcount leak on folio_split_unmapped failure Usama Arif
@ 2026-03-04 14:00 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-03-04 15:17 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-04 15:25 ` Joshua Hahn
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kiryl Shutsemau @ 2026-03-04 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Usama Arif
Cc: Andrew Morton, npache, david, ziy, linux-mm, matthew.brost,
joshua.hahnjy, hannes, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang,
apopple, riel, shakeel.butt, linux-kernel, kernel-team,
Usama Arif
On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 04:01:32AM -0800, Usama Arif wrote:
> From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
>
> migrate_vma_split_unmapped_folio() takes an extra reference via
> folio_get() before calling folio_split_unmapped(). On success, the
> split consumes this reference: __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped()
> expects the +1 in its folio_ref_freeze() check, and distributes it
> across the resulting sub-folios via folio_ref_unfreeze(...+1), which
> are later balanced by folio_put() calls in __migrate_device_finalize().
Without this explanation folio_get() looks very random. And I still
can't say I understand reference management for the folios here.
Who takes reference for the folio if it !THP that gets return in the
_finalize()?
Can we get reference for THP and !THP at the same spot?
I think we should avoid spacial-casing THP where possible.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate_device: fix folio refcount leak on folio_split_unmapped failure
2026-03-04 12:01 [PATCH] mm/migrate_device: fix folio refcount leak on folio_split_unmapped failure Usama Arif
2026-03-04 14:00 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
@ 2026-03-04 15:17 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-04 15:25 ` Joshua Hahn
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zi Yan @ 2026-03-04 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Usama Arif, Balbir Singh
Cc: Andrew Morton, npache, david, linux-mm, matthew.brost,
joshua.hahnjy, hannes, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang,
apopple, riel, shakeel.butt, kas, linux-kernel, kernel-team,
Usama Arif
On 4 Mar 2026, at 7:01, Usama Arif wrote:
> From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
>
> migrate_vma_split_unmapped_folio() takes an extra reference via
> folio_get() before calling folio_split_unmapped(). On success, the
> split consumes this reference: __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped()
> expects the +1 in its folio_ref_freeze() check, and distributes it
> across the resulting sub-folios via folio_ref_unfreeze(...+1), which
> are later balanced by folio_put() calls in __migrate_device_finalize().
>
> If folio_split_unmapped() fails (e.g., unexpected pinning returns
> -EAGAIN), the function returns without calling folio_put(). The extra
> reference is never released.
>
> Add the missing folio_put() on the error path.
>
> Fixes: 4265d67e405a4 ("mm/migrate_device: add THP splitting during migration")
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAA1CXcDyqPPwf_-W7B+PFQtL8HdoJGCEqVsVxq7DhOUB=L4PQA@mail.gmail.com/
> Reported-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
> ---
> mm/migrate_device.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate_device.c b/mm/migrate_device.c
> index 0a8b31939640f..351ecd9065d13 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate_device.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
> @@ -917,8 +917,10 @@ static int migrate_vma_split_unmapped_folio(struct migrate_vma *migrate,
> folio_get(folio);
> split_huge_pmd_address(migrate->vma, addr, true);
> ret = folio_split_unmapped(folio, 0);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + folio_put(folio);
> return ret;
> + }
> migrate->src[idx] &= ~MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND;
> flags = migrate->src[idx] & ((1UL << MIGRATE_PFN_SHIFT) - 1);
> pfn = migrate->src[idx] >> MIGRATE_PFN_SHIFT;
> --
> 2.47.3
Add Balbir, who wrote the code, to comment on this.
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate_device: fix folio refcount leak on folio_split_unmapped failure
2026-03-04 12:01 [PATCH] mm/migrate_device: fix folio refcount leak on folio_split_unmapped failure Usama Arif
2026-03-04 14:00 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-03-04 15:17 ` Zi Yan
@ 2026-03-04 15:25 ` Joshua Hahn
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Hahn @ 2026-03-04 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Usama Arif
Cc: Andrew Morton, npache, david, ziy, linux-mm, matthew.brost,
joshua.hahnjy, hannes, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang,
apopple, riel, shakeel.butt, kas, linux-kernel, kernel-team,
Usama Arif
On Wed, 4 Mar 2026 04:01:32 -0800 Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
>
> migrate_vma_split_unmapped_folio() takes an extra reference via
> folio_get() before calling folio_split_unmapped(). On success, the
> split consumes this reference: __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped()
> expects the +1 in its folio_ref_freeze() check, and distributes it
> across the resulting sub-folios via folio_ref_unfreeze(...+1), which
> are later balanced by folio_put() calls in __migrate_device_finalize().
>
> If folio_split_unmapped() fails (e.g., unexpected pinning returns
> -EAGAIN), the function returns without calling folio_put(). The extra
> reference is never released.
>
> Add the missing folio_put() on the error path.
Agreed with Kiryl that maybe there is an opportunity to do additional
cleanup. But as a fix for the issue, I think that this patch looks good
to me. We can send a follow-up patch in the future if we want to
clean this area up : -)
Reviewed-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 4265d67e405a4 ("mm/migrate_device: add THP splitting during migration")
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAA1CXcDyqPPwf_-W7B+PFQtL8HdoJGCEqVsVxq7DhOUB=L4PQA@mail.gmail.com/
> Reported-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
> ---
> mm/migrate_device.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate_device.c b/mm/migrate_device.c
> index 0a8b31939640f..351ecd9065d13 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate_device.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
> @@ -917,8 +917,10 @@ static int migrate_vma_split_unmapped_folio(struct migrate_vma *migrate,
> folio_get(folio);
> split_huge_pmd_address(migrate->vma, addr, true);
> ret = folio_split_unmapped(folio, 0);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + folio_put(folio);
> return ret;
> + }
> migrate->src[idx] &= ~MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND;
> flags = migrate->src[idx] & ((1UL << MIGRATE_PFN_SHIFT) - 1);
> pfn = migrate->src[idx] >> MIGRATE_PFN_SHIFT;
> --
> 2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread