From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FB0DFD9E21 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 23:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B97426B025A; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:15:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B3AD46B0278; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:15:08 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A19FA6B0277; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:15:08 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C086B025A for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:15:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364E81A03AC for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 23:15:08 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84488165496.29.816C018 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD0CA0018 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 23:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="W/ZpgV94"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.12 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1772147706; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=AWj6yd1k9yjYdTXMcGHxabr0TRyEXMTZCncbMHnEi70mN/mEcxkGwYX2SVgwLcySsblIRx 8RhhmzaIVgg8nl6N3TGrOwYgeSMP4qSAQUhRg0/jDM+ZQND2l0znVQfGwPxSyI69oApGrx splc0psut4S/hqd3PmttXKI7JjnWWsY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="W/ZpgV94"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.12 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1772147706; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=kYYhRKCToHDsUCIuN4vrAmdcD6m3ohqjAjWv2cZpcwg=; b=iteIH1kPpUohuZcQa6SdRdBLPY4s1RGZWiKq8QLfl0M1dRWbX8Idzr+W4uhLGAaI4Q04Sl D0O9BMz3VP6eygvBHlA3N3vRQYZFrjPkP8Xjv/kgMsg+QeftF2AoeBEvlnj51XYGLxeadQ MMirz7Po0H3TPDlIa0AdVxjg7ht9UHE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1772147706; x=1803683706; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1QULWzsr2e2b65ZGOCuixqf1C/tdqrHaHG9NUQlBUIw=; b=W/ZpgV94GRHdVYKnF6N5yNJUknosuHN70GibP9j7E44ZwMxyznLpep/+ toTUfntOEl5XlVl4b/hHwSPMy0O4hUQo/pn5M8knfm/qXT1bPUgDH6jRk e4+jWrm7qJlRE8LRo7lbEKsNmCkMmGa0eg5b39LpQoBL8JqthuO4xotW1 Hmj1ToEZI0W7fl9CTo4Z9/3mwANqQ12F1SFSObQ4taYip21q4RNvj+zzY 3iPC8O8rDheNQdMFU+G/s1o7Rrn224e7x0HBEr4ZYv0ZHOA9fDjgF4OpU kHzvh4mPzueODKnoK83ZG2TdiU94Fu84UpCdNPM690IbMHCQF+DSZFTe3 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 9S9L3+YfRKKNCIXOtVpOkQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: X1fGkUCFT8e7cW4pbvCs3g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11713"; a="77092927" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,313,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="77092927" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2026 15:15:04 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2Ujo1zZdSja+vhUZQWZEDg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: aHK2O8JZRiaf+uBUehWdPQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,313,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="216623051" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO a3936d6a266d) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2026 15:14:56 -0800 Received: from kbuild by a3936d6a266d with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vvkYm-000000009zL-36dX; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 23:14:31 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 07:13:12 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Joshua Hahn , Minchan Kim , Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Johannes Weiner , Yosry Ahmed , Nhat Pham , Chengming Zhou , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] mm/zsmalloc,zswap: Redirect zswap_entry->obcg to zpdesc Message-ID: <202602270738.SxqPEs3Q-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260226192936.3190275-6-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260226192936.3190275-6-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BAD0CA0018 X-Stat-Signature: re64y5zorauz1nwa3r6hhabbhu7bz1pw X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1772147705-280350 X-HE-Meta: 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 0BqIJ8kF 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 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Joshua, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on axboe/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.0-rc1 next-20260226] [cannot apply to akpm-mm/mm-everything] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joshua-Hahn/mm-zsmalloc-Rename-zs_object_copy-to-zs_obj_copy/20260227-033239 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260226192936.3190275-6-joshua.hahnjy%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH 5/8] mm/zsmalloc,zswap: Redirect zswap_entry->obcg to zpdesc config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-004-20260227 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260227/202602270738.SxqPEs3Q-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260227/202602270738.SxqPEs3Q-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602270738.SxqPEs3Q-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/zswap.c: In function 'zswap_lru_add': >> mm/zswap.c:626:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'obj_cgroup_memcg'; did you mean 'obj_cgroup_get'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 626 | memcg = objcg ? obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg) : NULL; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | obj_cgroup_get >> mm/zswap.c:626:49: error: pointer/integer type mismatch in conditional expression [-Wint-conversion] 626 | memcg = objcg ? obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg) : NULL; | ^ mm/zswap.c: In function 'zswap_lru_del': mm/zswap.c:639:49: error: pointer/integer type mismatch in conditional expression [-Wint-conversion] 639 | memcg = objcg ? obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg) : NULL; | ^ vim +626 mm/zswap.c 607 608 static void zswap_lru_add(struct list_lru *list_lru, struct zswap_entry *entry, 609 struct obj_cgroup *objcg) 610 { 611 int nid = entry_to_nid(entry); 612 struct mem_cgroup *memcg; 613 614 /* 615 * Note that it is safe to use rcu_read_lock() here, even in the face of 616 * concurrent memcg offlining: 617 * 618 * 1. list_lru_add() is called before list_lru_one is dead. The 619 * new entry will be reparented to memcg's parent's list_lru. 620 * 2. list_lru_add() is called after list_lru_one is dead. The 621 * new entry will be added directly to memcg's parent's list_lru. 622 * 623 * Similar reasoning holds for list_lru_del(). 624 */ 625 rcu_read_lock(); > 626 memcg = objcg ? obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg) : NULL; 627 /* will always succeed */ 628 list_lru_add(list_lru, &entry->lru, nid, memcg); 629 rcu_read_unlock(); 630 } 631 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki