Hi John, On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 10:03:21AM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 2:18 AM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 10:51:30AM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > > > So heaps-as-modules is common in the Android kernels, and was > > > attempted to be upstreamed long ago: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191025234834.28214-1-john.stultz@linaro.org/ > > > > > > And it got a fairly chilly reception, but maybe having the additional > > > optee heap (as well as other proposed heaps) might sway folks on this > > > now. > > > > I didn't know that Android was using heap as modules only, but I'd say > > that it's even more of a reason to upstream it then. > > > > > There is also the kref bits you might need (which Android still carries): > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200725032633.125006-1-john.stultz@linaro.org/ > > > > I'm curious about this one though. It looks like you add refcounting, > > but never really get the references anywhere. What was your intent, that > > on every allocation the buffer would get a reference to the heap so we > > avoid removing a heap with allocated buffers? > > Oh, apologies I mixed this up. You can ignore that suggestion. > > In Android, once folks were familiar with thinking about dma-buf > heaps, some (out of tree) drivers wanted to be able to internally > allocate from a given heap (somewhat of a hold-over from the old ION > drivers). So we have a convenience patch to provide that: > https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/8e1ec97355ef9927e82ec18c98312bdcd80bf289%5E%21/ > > And since we return a dma_heap to the driver to allocate against: > https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/fc1310ebf8fe25ea7b983400e6fa41f5a6d11966%5E%21/ > > The kref bit is to make sure we're doing proper reference counting on > that shared pointer. > > This ended up getting bundled together along with the heaps-as-modules > changes in our out-of-tree changes, and I just confused its use here. Understood, thanks :) It looks like there's some people interested in doing what you described though, so we might need your patch still. Maxime