From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
"Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_alloc: remove IRQ saving/restoring from pcp locking
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 18:07:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260227-b4-pcp-locking-cleanup-v1-2-f7e22e603447@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260227-b4-pcp-locking-cleanup-v1-0-f7e22e603447@kernel.org>
Effectively revert commit 038a102535eb ("mm/page_alloc: prevent pcp
corruption with SMP=n"). The original problem is now avoided by
pcp_spin_trylock() always failing on CONFIG_SMP=n, so we do not need to
disable IRQs anymore.
It's not a complete revert, because keeping the pcp_spin_(un)lock()
wrappers is useful. Rename them from _maybe_irqsave/restore to _nopin.
The difference from pcp_spin_trylock()/pcp_spin_unlock() is that the
_nopin variants don't perform pcpu_task_pin/unpin().
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 65efcaeb8800..8e5b30adfe40 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -155,24 +155,14 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pcp_batch_high_lock);
BUG_ON(1)
#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
-static inline void __flags_noop(unsigned long *flags) { }
-#define pcp_spin_lock_maybe_irqsave(ptr, flags) \
-({ \
- __flags_noop(&(flags)); \
- spin_lock(&(ptr)->lock); \
-})
-#define pcp_spin_unlock_maybe_irqrestore(ptr, flags) \
-({ \
- spin_unlock(&(ptr)->lock); \
- __flags_noop(&(flags)); \
-})
-#else
-#define pcp_spin_lock_maybe_irqsave(ptr, flags) \
- spin_lock_irqsave(&(ptr)->lock, flags)
-#define pcp_spin_unlock_maybe_irqrestore(ptr, flags) \
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&(ptr)->lock, flags)
-#endif
+/*
+ * In some cases we do not need to pin the task to the CPU because we are
+ * already given a specific cpu's pcp pointer.
+ */
+#define pcp_spin_lock_nopin(ptr) \
+ spin_lock(&(ptr)->lock)
+#define pcp_spin_unlock_nopin(ptr) \
+ spin_unlock(&(ptr)->lock)
#ifdef CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, numa_node);
@@ -2572,7 +2562,6 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
bool decay_pcp_high(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp)
{
int high_min, to_drain, to_drain_batched, batch;
- unsigned long UP_flags;
bool todo = false;
high_min = READ_ONCE(pcp->high_min);
@@ -2592,9 +2581,9 @@ bool decay_pcp_high(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp)
to_drain = pcp->count - pcp->high;
while (to_drain > 0) {
to_drain_batched = min(to_drain, batch);
- pcp_spin_lock_maybe_irqsave(pcp, UP_flags);
+ pcp_spin_lock_nopin(pcp);
free_pcppages_bulk(zone, to_drain_batched, pcp, 0);
- pcp_spin_unlock_maybe_irqrestore(pcp, UP_flags);
+ pcp_spin_unlock_nopin(pcp);
todo = true;
to_drain -= to_drain_batched;
@@ -2611,15 +2600,14 @@ bool decay_pcp_high(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp)
*/
void drain_zone_pages(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp)
{
- unsigned long UP_flags;
int to_drain, batch;
batch = READ_ONCE(pcp->batch);
to_drain = min(pcp->count, batch);
if (to_drain > 0) {
- pcp_spin_lock_maybe_irqsave(pcp, UP_flags);
+ pcp_spin_lock_nopin(pcp);
free_pcppages_bulk(zone, to_drain, pcp, 0);
- pcp_spin_unlock_maybe_irqrestore(pcp, UP_flags);
+ pcp_spin_unlock_nopin(pcp);
}
}
#endif
@@ -2630,11 +2618,10 @@ void drain_zone_pages(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp)
static void drain_pages_zone(unsigned int cpu, struct zone *zone)
{
struct per_cpu_pages *pcp = per_cpu_ptr(zone->per_cpu_pageset, cpu);
- unsigned long UP_flags;
int count;
do {
- pcp_spin_lock_maybe_irqsave(pcp, UP_flags);
+ pcp_spin_lock_nopin(pcp);
count = pcp->count;
if (count) {
int to_drain = min(count,
@@ -2643,7 +2630,7 @@ static void drain_pages_zone(unsigned int cpu, struct zone *zone)
free_pcppages_bulk(zone, to_drain, pcp, 0);
count -= to_drain;
}
- pcp_spin_unlock_maybe_irqrestore(pcp, UP_flags);
+ pcp_spin_unlock_nopin(pcp);
} while (count);
}
@@ -6127,7 +6114,6 @@ static void zone_pcp_update_cacheinfo(struct zone *zone, unsigned int cpu)
{
struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
struct cpu_cacheinfo *cci;
- unsigned long UP_flags;
pcp = per_cpu_ptr(zone->per_cpu_pageset, cpu);
cci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
@@ -6138,12 +6124,12 @@ static void zone_pcp_update_cacheinfo(struct zone *zone, unsigned int cpu)
* This can reduce zone lock contention without hurting
* cache-hot pages sharing.
*/
- pcp_spin_lock_maybe_irqsave(pcp, UP_flags);
+ pcp_spin_lock_nopin(pcp);
if ((cci->per_cpu_data_slice_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > 3 * pcp->batch)
pcp->flags |= PCPF_FREE_HIGH_BATCH;
else
pcp->flags &= ~PCPF_FREE_HIGH_BATCH;
- pcp_spin_unlock_maybe_irqrestore(pcp, UP_flags);
+ pcp_spin_unlock_nopin(pcp);
}
void setup_pcp_cacheinfo(unsigned int cpu)
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-27 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-27 17:07 [PATCH 0/3] mm/page_alloc: pcp locking cleanup Vlastimil Babka
2026-02-27 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/page_alloc: effectively disable pcp with CONFIG_SMP=n Vlastimil Babka
2026-02-27 17:07 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2026-02-27 17:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/page_alloc: remove pcpu_spin_* wrappers Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260227-b4-pcp-locking-cleanup-v1-2-f7e22e603447@kernel.org \
--to=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox