From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
Cc: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>,
robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iommu/dma: Validate page before accessing P2PDMA state
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:50:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260225075000.GA9541@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZ4Q1HA9q1ojsVYY@google.com>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 08:57:56PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 02:32:21PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 10:42:57AM +0000, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
> > > When mapping scatter-gather entries that reference reserved
> > > memory regions without struct page backing (e.g., bootloader created
> > > carveouts), is_pci_p2pdma_page() dereferences the page pointer
> > > returned by sg_page() without first verifying its validity.
> >
> > I believe this behavior started after commit 88df6ab2f34b
> > ("mm: add folio_is_pci_p2pdma()"). Prior to that change, the
> > is_zone_device_page(page) check would return false when given a
> > non‑existent page pointer.
> >
>
> Doesn't folio_is_pci_p2pdma() also check for zone device?
> I see[1] that it does:
>
> static inline bool folio_is_pci_p2pdma(const struct folio *folio)
> {
> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA) &&
> folio_is_zone_device(folio) &&
> folio->pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_PCI_P2PDMA;
> }
>
> I believe the problem arises due to the page_folio() call in
> folio_is_pci_p2pdma(page_folio(page)); within is_pci_p2pdma_page().
> page_folio() assumes it has a valid struct page to work with. For these
> carveouts, that isn't true.
Yes, i came to the same conclusion, just explained why it worked before.
>
> Potentially something like the following would stop the crash:
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memremap.h b/include/linux/memremap.h
> index e3c2ccf872a8..e47876021afa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memremap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h
> @@ -197,7 +197,8 @@ static inline void folio_set_zone_device_data(struct folio *folio, void *data)
>
> static inline bool is_pci_p2pdma_page(const struct page *page)
> {
> - return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA) &&
> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA) && page &&
> + pfn_valid(page_to_pfn(page)) &&
pfn_valid() is a relatively expensive function [1] to invoke in the data path,
and is_pci_p2pdma_page() ends up being called in these execution flows.
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.19.3/source/include/linux/mmzone.h#L2167
> folio_is_pci_p2pdma(page_folio(page));
> }
>
>
> But my broader question is: why are we calling a page-based API like
> is_pci_p2pdma_page() on non-struct-page memory in the first place?
+1
> Could we instead add a helper to verify if the sg_page() return value
> is actually backed by a struct page?
According to the SG design, callers should store only struct page pointers.
There is one known user that violates this requirement: dmabuf, which is
gradually being migrated away from this behavior [2].
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0-v1-b5cab63049c0+191af-dmabuf_map_type_jgg@nvidia.com/
> If it isn't, we should arguably skip the P2PDMA logic entirely and fall
> back to a dma_map_phys style path. Isn't handling these "pageless" physical
> ranges the primary reason dma_map_phys exists?
Right. dma_map_sg() is indeed the wrong API to use for memory that is not
backed by struct page pointers.
Thanks
>
> +mm list
>
> Thanks,
> Praan
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.19.3/source/include/linux/memremap.h#L179
>
>
> > If any fix is needed, the is_pci_p2pdma_page() must be changed and not iommu.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > > This causes a kernel paging fault when CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA is enabled
> > > and dma_map_sg_attrs() is called for memory regions that have no
> > > associated struct page:
> > >
> > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffc007d100000
> > > ...
> > > Call trace:
> > > iommu_dma_map_sg+0x118/0x414
> > > dma_map_sg_attrs+0x38/0x44
> > >
> > > Fix this by adding a pfn_valid() check before calling
> > > is_pci_p2pdma_page(). If the page frame number is invalid, skip the
> > > P2PDMA check entirely as such memory cannot be P2PDMA memory anyway.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 4 ++++
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> > > index 5dac64be61bb..5f45f33b23c2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> > > @@ -1423,6 +1423,9 @@ int iommu_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
> > > size_t s_length = s->length;
> > > size_t pad_len = (mask - iova_len + 1) & mask;
> > >
> > > + if (!pfn_valid(page_to_pfn(sg_page(s))))
> > > + goto post_pci_p2pdma;
> > > +
> > > switch (pci_p2pdma_state(&p2pdma_state, dev, sg_page(s))) {
> > > case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE:
> > > /*
> > > @@ -1449,6 +1452,7 @@ int iommu_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
> > > goto out_restore_sg;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +post_pci_p2pdma:
> > > sg_dma_address(s) = s_iova_off;
> > > sg_dma_len(s) = s_length;
> > > s->offset -= s_iova_off;
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> > >
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-25 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260224104257.1641429-1-amhetre@nvidia.com>
[not found] ` <20260224123221.GM10607@unreal>
2026-02-24 20:57 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-02-25 4:49 ` Ashish Mhetre
2026-02-25 7:56 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-02-25 7:50 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260225075000.GA9541@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=amhetre@nvidia.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox