linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
	 Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	 rppt@kernel.org, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	derkling@google.com,  reijiw@google.com,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	rientjes@google.com,  "Kalyazin, Nikita" <kalyazin@amazon.co.uk>,
	patrick.roy@linux.dev,  "Itazuri, Takahiro" <itazur@amazon.co.uk>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	 David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	 Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 16/19] mm/page_alloc: introduce ALLOC_NOBLOCK
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 16:34:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260225-page_alloc-unmapped-v1-16-e8808a03cd66@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260225-page_alloc-unmapped-v1-0-e8808a03cd66@google.com>

This flag is set unless we can be sure the caller isn't in an atomic
context.

The allocator will soon start needing to call set_direct_map_* APIs
which cannot be called with IRQs off. It will need to do this even
before direct reclaim is possible.

Despite the fact that, in principle, ALLOC_NOBLOCK is distinct from
__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, in order to avoid introducing a GFP flag, just
infer the former based on whether the caller set the latter. This means
that, in practice, ALLOC_NOBLOCK is just !__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, except
that it is not influenced by gfp_allowed_mask. This could change later,
though.

Call it ALLOC_NOBLOCK in order to try and mitigate confusion vs the
recently-removed ALLOC_NON_BLOCK, which meant something different.

Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
---
 mm/internal.h   |  1 +
 mm/page_alloc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 5be53d25c89b7..6f2eacf3d8f2c 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -1390,6 +1390,7 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
 #define ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC	0x200 /* Allows access to MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC */
 #define ALLOC_TRYLOCK		0x400 /* Only use spin_trylock in allocation path */
 #define ALLOC_KSWAPD		0x800 /* allow waking of kswapd, __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM set */
+#define ALLOC_NOBLOCK	       0x1000 /* Caller may be atomic */
 
 /* Flags that allow allocations below the min watermark. */
 #define ALLOC_RESERVES (ALLOC_HARDER|ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE|ALLOC_HIGHATOMIC|ALLOC_OOM)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 42b807faca5fe..5576bd6a26b7b 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4646,6 +4646,8 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
 		(gfp_mask & (__GFP_HIGH | __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM));
 
 	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)) {
+		alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NOBLOCK;
+
 		/*
 		 * Not worth trying to allocate harder for __GFP_NOMEMALLOC even
 		 * if it can't schedule.
@@ -4839,14 +4841,13 @@ check_retry_cpuset(int cpuset_mems_cookie, struct alloc_context *ac)
 
 static inline struct page *
 __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
-						struct alloc_context *ac)
+		       struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned int alloc_flags)
 {
 	bool can_direct_reclaim = gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
 	bool can_compact = can_direct_reclaim && gfp_compaction_allowed(gfp_mask);
 	bool nofail = gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL;
 	const bool costly_order = order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER;
 	struct page *page = NULL;
-	unsigned int alloc_flags;
 	unsigned long did_some_progress;
 	enum compact_priority compact_priority;
 	enum compact_result compact_result;
@@ -4898,7 +4899,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 	 * kswapd needs to be woken up, and to avoid the cost of setting up
 	 * alloc_flags precisely. So we do that now.
 	 */
-	alloc_flags = gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_mask, order);
+	alloc_flags |= gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_mask, order);
 
 	/*
 	 * We need to recalculate the starting point for the zonelist iterator
@@ -5124,6 +5125,18 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 	return page;
 }
 
+static inline unsigned int init_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int flags)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If the caller allowed __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, they can't be atomic.
+	 * Note this is a separate determination from whether direct reclaim is
+	 * actually allowed, it must happen before applying gfp_allowed_mask.
+	 */
+	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM))
+		flags |= ALLOC_NOBLOCK;
+	return flags;
+}
+
 static inline bool prepare_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
 		int preferred_nid, nodemask_t *nodemask,
 		struct alloc_context *ac, gfp_t *alloc_gfp,
@@ -5205,7 +5218,7 @@ unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_noprof(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
 	struct list_head *pcp_list;
 	struct alloc_context ac;
 	gfp_t alloc_gfp;
-	unsigned int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_LOW;
+	unsigned int alloc_flags = init_alloc_flags(gfp, ALLOC_WMARK_LOW);
 	int nr_populated = 0, nr_account = 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -5346,7 +5359,7 @@ struct page *__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order,
 		int preferred_nid, nodemask_t *nodemask)
 {
 	struct page *page;
-	unsigned int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_LOW;
+	unsigned int alloc_flags = init_alloc_flags(gfp, ALLOC_WMARK_LOW);
 	gfp_t alloc_gfp; /* The gfp_t that was actually used for allocation */
 	struct alloc_context ac = { };
 
@@ -5391,7 +5404,7 @@ struct page *__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order,
 	 */
 	ac.nodemask = nodemask;
 
-	page = __alloc_pages_slowpath(alloc_gfp, order, &ac);
+	page = __alloc_pages_slowpath(alloc_gfp, order, &ac, alloc_flags);
 
 out:
 	if (memcg_kmem_online() && (gfp & __GFP_ACCOUNT) && page &&
@@ -7911,11 +7924,13 @@ struct page *alloc_frozen_pages_nolock_noprof(gfp_t gfp_flags, int nid, unsigned
 	 */
 	gfp_t alloc_gfp = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_COMP
 			| gfp_flags;
-	unsigned int alloc_flags = ALLOC_TRYLOCK;
+	unsigned int alloc_flags = init_alloc_flags(alloc_gfp, ALLOC_TRYLOCK);
 	struct alloc_context ac = { };
 	struct page *page;
 
 	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(gfp_flags & ~__GFP_ACCOUNT);
+	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOBLOCK));
+
 	/*
 	 * In PREEMPT_RT spin_trylock() will call raw_spin_lock() which is
 	 * unsafe in NMI. If spin_trylock() is called from hard IRQ the current

-- 
2.51.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-25 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-25 16:34 [PATCH RFC 00/19] mm: Add __GFP_UNMAPPED Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 01/19] x86/mm: split out preallocate_sub_pgd() Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 02/19] x86/mm: Generalize LDT remap into "mm-local region" Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 03/19] x86/tlb: Expose some flush function declarations to modules Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 04/19] x86/mm: introduce the mermap Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 05/19] mm: KUnit tests for " Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 06/19] mm: introduce for_each_free_list() Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 07/19] mm/page_alloc: don't overload migratetype in find_suitable_fallback() Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 08/19] mm: introduce freetype_t Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 09/19] mm: move migratetype definitions to freetype.h Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 10/19] mm: add definitions for allocating unmapped pages Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 11/19] mm: rejig pageblock mask definitions Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 12/19] mm: encode freetype flags in pageblock flags Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 13/19] mm/page_alloc: remove ifdefs from pindex helpers Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 14/19] mm/page_alloc: separate pcplists by freetype flags Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 15/19] mm/page_alloc: rename ALLOC_NON_BLOCK back to _HARDER Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` Brendan Jackman [this message]
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 17/19] mm/page_alloc: implement __GFP_UNMAPPED allocations Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 18/19] mm/page_alloc: implement __GFP_UNMAPPED|__GFP_ZERO allocations Brendan Jackman
2026-02-25 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 19/19] mm: Minimal KUnit tests for some new page_alloc logic Brendan Jackman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260225-page_alloc-unmapped-v1-16-e8808a03cd66@google.com \
    --to=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=derkling@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=itazur@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=kalyazin@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=patrick.roy@linux.dev \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox