linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	 "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	 "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	 Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	 seanjc@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
	rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com,  yan.y.zhao@intel.com,
	fvdl@google.com, jthoughton@google.com,  vannapurve@google.com,
	shivankg@amd.com, michael.roth@amd.com,  pratyush@kernel.org,
	pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, kalyazin@amazon.com,
	 tabba@google.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,  linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 3/6] fs: Add .unaccount_folio callback
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 07:20:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260225-gmem-st-blocks-v2-3-87d7098119a9@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260225-gmem-st-blocks-v2-0-87d7098119a9@google.com>

Add .unaccount_folio callback to allow filesystems to do accounting-related
updates to the inode or struct address_space mapping, when the folio is
about to be removed from the filemap/page_cache.

.free_folio cannot be used since .free_folio cannot assume that struct
address_space mapping still exists.

From the name, .invalidate_folio and .release_folio seem suitable, but
those are meant only to handle freeing of a folio's private
data. .release_folio is also not called in the truncation path.

An alternative would be to add a more general callback and call that from
filemap_remove_folio() and delete_from_page_cache_batch(). .unaccount_folio
was chosen as it is more specific to the how guest_memfd will be using this
callback in later patches. Also, .unaccount_folio only needs a single call
site.

This further refactoring was considered:

if (mapping->a_ops->unaccount_folio &&
    mapping->a_ops->unaccount_folio(folio))
	... do generic page_cache unaccounting ...

but that was abandoned since a hugetlb folio may not have an associated
mapping.

Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst | 8 ++++++++
 include/linux/fs.h                | 1 +
 mm/filemap.c                      | 3 +++
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
index 670ba66b60e49..5ed5c43d5768b 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
@@ -809,6 +809,7 @@ cache in your filesystem.  The following members are defined:
 		sector_t (*bmap)(struct address_space *, sector_t);
 		void (*invalidate_folio) (struct folio *, size_t start, size_t len);
 		bool (*release_folio)(struct folio *, gfp_t);
+		void (*unaccount_folio)(struct folio *folio);
 		void (*free_folio)(struct folio *);
 		ssize_t (*direct_IO)(struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *iter);
 		int (*migrate_folio)(struct mapping *, struct folio *dst,
@@ -967,6 +968,13 @@ cache in your filesystem.  The following members are defined:
 	its release_folio will need to ensure this.  Possibly it can
 	clear the uptodate flag if it cannot free private data yet.
 
+``unaccount_folio``
+       unaccount_folio is called under inode lock and struct
+       address_space's xa_lock, just before the folio is removed from
+       the page cache in order to allow updating any kind of
+       accounting on the inode or address_space mapping while the
+       address_space mapping still exists.
+
 ``free_folio``
 	free_folio is called once the folio is no longer visible in the
 	page cache in order to allow the cleanup of any private data.
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index a01621fa636a6..c71f327032142 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ struct address_space_operations {
 	sector_t (*bmap)(struct address_space *, sector_t);
 	void (*invalidate_folio) (struct folio *, size_t offset, size_t len);
 	bool (*release_folio)(struct folio *, gfp_t);
+	void (*unaccount_folio)(struct folio *folio);
 	void (*free_folio)(struct folio *folio);
 	ssize_t (*direct_IO)(struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *iter);
 	/*
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index ebd75684cb0a7..ff957929e6087 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -176,6 +176,9 @@ static void filemap_unaccount_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (unlikely(mapping->a_ops->unaccount_folio))
+		mapping->a_ops->unaccount_folio(folio);
+
 	/* hugetlb folios do not participate in page cache accounting. */
 	if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio))
 		return;

-- 
2.53.0.414.gf7e9f6c205-goog



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-25  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-25  7:20 [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] guest_memfd: Track amount of memory allocated on inode Ackerley Tng
2026-02-25  7:20 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/6] KVM: guest_memfd: Don't set FGP_ACCESSED when getting folios Ackerley Tng
2026-02-25  7:20 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/6] KVM: guest_memfd: Directly allocate folios with filemap_alloc_folio() Ackerley Tng
2026-02-25  7:20 ` Ackerley Tng [this message]
2026-02-25  7:20 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] KVM: guest_memfd: Track amount of memory allocated on inode Ackerley Tng
2026-02-25  7:20 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/6] KVM: selftests: Wrap fstat() to assert success Ackerley Tng
2026-02-25  7:20 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] KVM: selftests: Test that st_blocks is updated on allocation Ackerley Tng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260225-gmem-st-blocks-v2-3-87d7098119a9@google.com \
    --to=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=kalyazin@amazon.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shivankg@amd.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox