From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm: memfd_luo: always dirty all folios
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:39:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260223173931.2221759-3-pratyush@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223173931.2221759-1-pratyush@kernel.org>
From: "Pratyush Yadav (Google)" <pratyush@kernel.org>
A dirty folio is one which has been written to. A clean folio is its
opposite. Since a clean folio has no user data, it can be freed under
memory pressure.
memfd preservation with LUO saves the flag at preserve(). This is
problematic. The folio might get dirtied later. Saving it at freeze()
also doesn't work, since the dirty bit from PTE is normally synced at
unmap and there might still be mappings of the file at freeze().
To see why this is a problem, say a folio is clean at preserve, but gets
dirtied later. The serialized state of the folio will mark it as clean.
After retrieve, the next kernel will see the folio as clean and might
try to reclaim it under memory pressure. This will result in losing user
data.
Mark all folios of the file as dirty, and always set the
MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_DIRTY flag. This comes with the side effect of making
all clean folios un-reclaimable. This is a cost that has to be paid for
participants of live update. It is not expected to be a common use case
to preserve a lot of clean folios anyway.
Since the value of pfolio->flags is a constant now, drop the flags
variable and set it directly.
Fixes: b3749f174d68 ("mm: memfd_luo: allow preserving memfd")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav (Google) <pratyush@kernel.org>
---
mm/memfd_luo.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memfd_luo.c b/mm/memfd_luo.c
index ccbf1337f650..9eac02d06b5a 100644
--- a/mm/memfd_luo.c
+++ b/mm/memfd_luo.c
@@ -146,7 +146,6 @@ static int memfd_luo_preserve_folios(struct file *file,
for (i = 0; i < nr_folios; i++) {
struct memfd_luo_folio_ser *pfolio = &folios_ser[i];
struct folio *folio = folios[i];
- unsigned int flags = 0;
err = kho_preserve_folio(folio);
if (err)
@@ -154,8 +153,26 @@ static int memfd_luo_preserve_folios(struct file *file,
folio_lock(folio);
- if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
- flags |= MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_DIRTY;
+ /*
+ * A dirty folio is one which has been written to. A clean folio
+ * is its opposite. Since a clean folio does not carry user
+ * data, it can be freed by page reclaim under memory pressure.
+ *
+ * Saving the dirty flag at prepare() time doesn't work since it
+ * can change later. Saving it at freeze() also won't work
+ * because the dirty bit is normally synced at unmap and there
+ * might still be a mapping of the file at freeze().
+ *
+ * To see why this is a problem, say a folio is clean at
+ * preserve, but gets dirtied later. The pfolio flags will mark
+ * it as clean. After retrieve, the next kernel might try to
+ * reclaim this folio under memory pressure, losing user data.
+ *
+ * Unconditionally mark it dirty to avoid this problem. This
+ * comes at the cost of making clean folios un-reclaimable after
+ * live update.
+ */
+ folio_mark_dirty(folio);
/*
* If the folio is not uptodate, it was fallocated but never
@@ -174,12 +191,11 @@ static int memfd_luo_preserve_folios(struct file *file,
flush_dcache_folio(folio);
folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
}
- flags |= MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_UPTODATE;
folio_unlock(folio);
pfolio->pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
- pfolio->flags = flags;
+ pfolio->flags = MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_DIRTY | MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_UPTODATE;
pfolio->index = folio->index;
}
--
2.53.0.371.g1d285c8824-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 17:39 [PATCH 0/2] mm: memfd_luo: fixes for folio flag preservation Pratyush Yadav
2026-02-23 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: memfd_luo: always make all folios uptodate Pratyush Yadav
2026-02-23 17:39 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260223173931.2221759-3-pratyush@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox