linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, damon@lists.linux.dev,
	kernel-team@meta.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
	jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
	alison.schofield@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
	ira.weiny@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	longman@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	mhocko@suse.com, osalvador@suse.de, ziy@nvidia.com,
	matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
	rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com, gourry@gourry.net,
	ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
	axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com,
	yury.norov@gmail.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com,
	jackmanb@google.com, sj@kernel.org,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, npache@redhat.com,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	lance.yang@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn,
	chengming.zhou@linux.dev, jannh@google.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
	nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, pfalcato@suse.de, rientjes@google.com,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, riel@surriel.com, harry.yoo@oracle.com,
	cl@gentwo.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, chrisl@kernel.org,
	kasong@tencent.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, nphamcs@gmail.com,
	bhe@redhat.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, terry.bowman@amd.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 17/27] mm/oom: NP_OPS_OOM_ELIGIBLE - private node OOM participation
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2026 03:48:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260222084842.1824063-18-gourry@gourry.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260222084842.1824063-1-gourry@gourry.net>

The OOM killer must know whether killing a task can actually free
memory such that pressure is reduced.

A private node only contributes to relieving pressure if it participates
in both reclaim and demotion. Without this check, the check, the OOM
killer may select an undeserving victim.

Introduce NP_OPS_OOM_ELIGIBLE and helpers node_oom_eligible() and
zone_oom_eligible().

Replace cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects() in oom_cpuset_eligible()
with oom_mems_intersect() that iterates N_MEMORY nodes and skips
ineligible private nodes.

Update constrained_alloc() to use zone_oom_eligible() for constraint
detection and node_oom_eligible() to exclude ineligible nodes from
totalpages accounting.

Remove cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects() as it has no remaining callers.

Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
---
 include/linux/cpuset.h       |  9 -------
 include/linux/node_private.h |  3 +++
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c       | 17 ------------
 mm/oom_kill.c                | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index 7b2f3f6b68a9..53ccfb00b277 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -97,9 +97,6 @@ static inline bool cpuset_zone_allowed(struct zone *z, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 	return true;
 }
 
-extern int cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(const struct task_struct *tsk1,
-					  const struct task_struct *tsk2);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS_V1
 #define cpuset_memory_pressure_bump() 				\
 	do {							\
@@ -241,12 +238,6 @@ static inline bool cpuset_zone_allowed(struct zone *z, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static inline int cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(const struct task_struct *tsk1,
-						 const struct task_struct *tsk2)
-{
-	return 1;
-}
-
 static inline void cpuset_memory_pressure_bump(void) {}
 
 static inline void cpuset_task_status_allowed(struct seq_file *m,
diff --git a/include/linux/node_private.h b/include/linux/node_private.h
index 34be52383255..34d862f09e24 100644
--- a/include/linux/node_private.h
+++ b/include/linux/node_private.h
@@ -141,6 +141,9 @@ struct node_private_ops {
 /* Kernel reclaim (kswapd, direct reclaim, OOM) operates on this node */
 #define NP_OPS_RECLAIM			BIT(4)
 
+/* Private node is OOM-eligible: reclaim can run and pages can be demoted here */
+#define NP_OPS_OOM_ELIGIBLE		(NP_OPS_RECLAIM | NP_OPS_DEMOTION)
+
 /**
  * struct node_private - Per-node container for N_MEMORY_PRIVATE nodes
  *
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 1a597f0c7c6c..29789d544fd5 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -4530,23 +4530,6 @@ int cpuset_mem_spread_node(void)
 	return cpuset_spread_node(&current->cpuset_mem_spread_rotor);
 }
 
-/**
- * cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects - Does @tsk1's mems_allowed intersect @tsk2's?
- * @tsk1: pointer to task_struct of some task.
- * @tsk2: pointer to task_struct of some other task.
- *
- * Description: Return true if @tsk1's mems_allowed intersects the
- * mems_allowed of @tsk2.  Used by the OOM killer to determine if
- * one of the task's memory usage might impact the memory available
- * to the other.
- **/
-
-int cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(const struct task_struct *tsk1,
-				   const struct task_struct *tsk2)
-{
-	return nodes_intersects(tsk1->mems_allowed, tsk2->mems_allowed);
-}
-
 /**
  * cpuset_print_current_mems_allowed - prints current's cpuset and mems_allowed
  *
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 5eb11fbba704..cd0d65ccd1e8 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -74,7 +74,45 @@ static inline bool is_memcg_oom(struct oom_control *oc)
 	return oc->memcg != NULL;
 }
 
+/* Private nodes are only eligible if they support both reclaim and demotion */
+static inline bool node_oom_eligible(int nid)
+{
+	if (!node_state(nid, N_MEMORY_PRIVATE))
+		return true;
+	return (node_private_flags(nid) & NP_OPS_OOM_ELIGIBLE) ==
+		NP_OPS_OOM_ELIGIBLE;
+}
+
+static inline bool zone_oom_eligible(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask)
+{
+	if (!node_oom_eligible(zone_to_nid(zone)))
+		return false;
+	return cpuset_zone_allowed(zone, gfp_mask);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+/*
+ * Killing a task can only relieve system pressure if freed memory can be
+ * demoted there and reclaim can operate on the node's pages, so we
+ * omit private nodes that aren't eligible.
+ */
+static bool oom_mems_intersect(const struct task_struct *tsk1,
+			       const struct task_struct *tsk2)
+{
+	int nid;
+
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
+		if (!node_isset(nid, tsk1->mems_allowed))
+			continue;
+		if (!node_isset(nid, tsk2->mems_allowed))
+			continue;
+		if (!node_oom_eligible(nid))
+			continue;
+		return true;
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 /**
  * oom_cpuset_eligible() - check task eligibility for kill
  * @start: task struct of which task to consider
@@ -107,9 +145,10 @@ static bool oom_cpuset_eligible(struct task_struct *start,
 		} else {
 			/*
 			 * This is not a mempolicy constrained oom, so only
-			 * check the mems of tsk's cpuset.
+			 * check the mems of tsk's cpuset, excluding private
+			 * nodes that do not participate in kernel reclaim.
 			 */
-			ret = cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(current, tsk);
+			ret = oom_mems_intersect(current, tsk);
 		}
 		if (ret)
 			break;
@@ -291,16 +330,19 @@ static enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct oom_control *oc)
 		return CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY;
 	}
 
-	/* Check this allocation failure is caused by cpuset's wall function */
+	/* Check this allocation failure is caused by cpuset or private node constraints */
 	for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, oc->zonelist,
 			highest_zoneidx, oc->nodemask)
-		if (!cpuset_zone_allowed(zone, oc->gfp_mask))
+		if (!zone_oom_eligible(zone, oc->gfp_mask))
 			cpuset_limited = true;
 
 	if (cpuset_limited) {
 		oc->totalpages = total_swap_pages;
-		for_each_node_mask(nid, cpuset_current_mems_allowed)
+		for_each_node_mask(nid, cpuset_current_mems_allowed) {
+			if (!node_oom_eligible(nid))
+				continue;
 			oc->totalpages += node_present_pages(nid);
+		}
 		return CONSTRAINT_CPUSET;
 	}
 	return CONSTRAINT_NONE;
-- 
2.53.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-22  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-22  8:48 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC][RFC PATCH v4 00/27] Private Memory Nodes (w/ Compressed RAM) Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/27] numa: introduce N_MEMORY_PRIVATE node state Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/27] mm,cpuset: gate allocations from N_MEMORY_PRIVATE behind __GFP_PRIVATE Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/27] mm/page_alloc: add numa_zone_allowed() and wire it up Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/27] mm/page_alloc: Add private node handling to build_zonelists Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/27] mm: introduce folio_is_private_managed() unified predicate Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/27] mm/mlock: skip mlock for managed-memory folios Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/27] mm/madvise: skip madvise " Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/27] mm/ksm: skip KSM " Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/27] mm/khugepaged: skip private node folios when trying to collapse Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/27] mm/swap: add free_folio callback for folio release cleanup Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/27] mm/huge_memory.c: add private node folio split notification callback Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/27] mm/migrate: NP_OPS_MIGRATION - support private node user migration Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/27] mm/mempolicy: NP_OPS_MEMPOLICY - support private node mempolicy Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/27] mm/memory-tiers: NP_OPS_DEMOTION - support private node demotion Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/27] mm/mprotect: NP_OPS_PROTECT_WRITE - gate PTE/PMD write-upgrades Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/27] mm: NP_OPS_RECLAIM - private node reclaim participation Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/27] mm/memory: NP_OPS_NUMA_BALANCING - private node NUMA balancing Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/27] mm/compaction: NP_OPS_COMPACTION - private node compaction support Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/27] mm/gup: NP_OPS_LONGTERM_PIN - private node longterm pin support Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/27] mm/memory-failure: add memory_failure callback to node_private_ops Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/27] mm/memory_hotplug: add add_private_memory_driver_managed() Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/27] mm/cram: add compressed ram memory management subsystem Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/27] cxl/core: Add cxl_sysram region type Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/27] cxl/core: Add private node support to cxl_sysram Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/27] cxl: add cxl_mempolicy sample PCI driver Gregory Price
2026-02-22  8:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 27/27] cxl: add cxl_compression " Gregory Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260222084842.1824063-18-gourry@gourry.net \
    --to=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox