From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
To: Qiliang Yuan <realwujing@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Qiliang Yuan <yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/12] Implementation of Dynamic Housekeeping & Enhanced Isolation (DHEI)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 14:07:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260220190706.GA2173704@joelbox2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260206-feature-dynamic_isolcpus_dhei-v1-0-00a711eb0c74@gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 02:04:21AM -0500, Qiliang Yuan wrote:
> The Linux kernel provides mechanisms like 'isolcpus' and 'nohz_full' to
> reduce interference for latency-sensitive workloads. However, these are
> locked behind the "Reboot Wall" - they can only be configured via boot
> parameters and require a system restart to change.
>
> *** THIS IS AN RFC ***
> This series is being submitted as an Request For Comments to discuss the
> architectural changes required to support dynamic reconfiguration of
> housekeeping boundaries. Key points for discussion:
[...]
> This series provides the necessary infrastructure for cloud-native
> orchestrators and high-frequency trading platforms to dynamically
> re-partition CPU resources without incurring the downtime of a reboot.
Could you provide more details of the usecase and hardware / CPU topology? In
which situations does a boot time isolation boundary not work? I think
knowing that will help discuss the need for this.
These systems typically have a lot of cores, and only a few of them need to
be isolated I believe (that's my usecase anyway at my day job).
thanks,
--
Joel Fernandes
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <realwujing@gmail.com>
> ---
> Qiliang Yuan (12):
> sched/isolation: Remove __init restriction from housekeeping cores
> sched/isolation: Introduce reconfiguration notifier chain
> genirq: Implement dynamic migration for Managed IRQs
> rcu: Sync RCU housekeeping mask on notification
> sched/core: Dynamic update housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)
> watchdog: Allow runtime toggle of hardlockup detector on CPUs
> workqueue: Dynamic housekeeping mask update support
> kcompactd: Add housekeeping notifier for dynamic mask update
> sched/isolation: Separate housekeeping types and add sysfs interface
> tick/nohz: Implement dynamic nohz_full state update
> sched/isolation: Implement SMT sibling auto-isolation and safety check
> sched/isolation: Bridge isolcpus and support runtime tick offload init
>
> include/linux/sched/isolation.h | 40 +++++--
> include/linux/tick.h | 2 +-
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 52 +++++++++
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 43 +++++++
> kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +-
> kernel/sched/isolation.c | 252 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 26 +++++
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 63 +++++++++-
> kernel/watchdog.c | 24 ++++
> kernel/workqueue.c | 39 +++++++
> mm/compaction.c | 26 +++++
> 12 files changed, 547 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 1f97d9dcf53649c41c33227b345a36902cbb08ad
> change-id: 20260206-feature-dynamic_isolcpus_dhei-ee46b6e3a477
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Qiliang Yuan <realwujing@gmail.com>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-20 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-06 7:04 Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] sched/isolation: Remove __init restriction from housekeeping cores Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] sched/isolation: Introduce reconfiguration notifier chain Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 03/12] genirq: Implement dynamic migration for Managed IRQs Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 12:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] rcu: Sync RCU housekeeping mask on notification Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 05/12] sched/core: Dynamic update housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN) Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] watchdog: Allow runtime toggle of hardlockup detector on CPUs Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] workqueue: Dynamic housekeeping mask update support Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 08/12] kcompactd: Add housekeeping notifier for dynamic mask update Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 15:09 ` Zi Yan
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] sched/isolation: Separate housekeeping types and add sysfs interface Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] tick/nohz: Implement dynamic nohz_full state update Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] sched/isolation: Implement SMT sibling auto-isolation and safety check Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-06 7:04 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] sched/isolation: Bridge isolcpus and support runtime tick offload init Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-20 19:07 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260220190706.GA2173704@joelbox2 \
--to=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=realwujing@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox