linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: "Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>,
	"Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Stoakes" <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
	"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
	"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: page: add byte-wise atomic memory copy methods
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 16:48:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260217154800.GY2995752@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZRokyTqsd_RwdkK@google.com>

On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 01:09:39PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 01:09:20PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 11:51:20AM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > 
> > > In my experience with dealing with `struct page` that is mapped into a
> > > vma, you need memcpy because the struct might be split across two
> > > different pages in the vma. The pages are adjacent in userspace's
> > > address space, but not necessarily adjacent from the kernel's POV.
> > > 
> > > So you might end up with something that looks like this:
> > > 
> > > struct foo val;
> > > void *ptr1 = kmap_local_page(p1);
> > > void *ptr2 = kmap_local_page(p2);
> > > memcpy(ptr1 + offset, val, PAGE_SIZE - offset);
> > > memcpy(ptr2, val + offset, sizeof(struct foo) - (PAGE_SIZE - offset));
> > > kunmap_local(ptr2);
> > > kunmap_local(ptr1);
> > 
> >   barrier();
> > 
> > > if (is_valid(&val)) {
> > >     // use val
> > > }
> > > 
> > > This exact thing happens in Binder. It has to be a memcpy.
> > 
> > Sure, but then stick that one barrier() in and you're good.
> 
> Are we really good? Consider this code:
> 
> 	bool is_valid(struct foo *val)
> 	{
> 		// for the sake of example
> 		return val->my_field != 0;
> 	}
> 
> 	struct foo val;
> 
> 	void *ptr = kmap_local_page(p1);
> 	memcpy(ptr, val, sizeof(struct foo));
> 	kunmap_local(p);
> 	barrier();
> 	if (is_valid(&val)) {
> 	    // use val
> 	}
> 
> optimize it into this first:
> 
> 	struct foo val;
> 	int my_field_copy;
> 
> 	void *ptr = kmap_local_page(p1);
> 	memcpy(ptr, val, sizeof(struct foo));
> 	my_field_copy = val->my_field;
> 	kunmap_local(p);
> 	barrier();
> 	if (my_field_copy != 0) {
> 	    // use val
> 	}
> 
> then optimize it into:
> 
> 	struct foo val;
> 	int my_field_copy;
> 
> 	void *ptr = kmap_local_page(p1);
> 	memcpy(ptr, val, sizeof(struct foo));
> 	my_field_copy = ((struct foo *) ptr)->my_field;
> 	kunmap_local(p);
> 	barrier();
> 	if (my_field_copy != 0) {
> 	    // use val
> 	}

I don;t think this is allowed. You're lifting the load over the
barrier(), that is invalid.

So the initial version is:

	ptr = kmap_local_page()
	memcpy(ptr, val, sizeof(val))
	kunmap_local(ptr);

	barrier()

	if (val.field)
	  // do stuff

So the 'val.field' load is after the barrier(); and it must stay there,
because the barrier() just told the compiler that all of memory changed
-- this is what barrier() does.




  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-17 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-12 14:51 Andreas Hindborg
2026-02-12 16:41 ` Boqun Feng
2026-02-12 17:10   ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-02-12 17:23     ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-02-13  9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-13 12:18   ` Greg KH
2026-02-13 12:58     ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-02-13 13:20       ` Greg KH
2026-02-13 14:13         ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-02-13 14:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-13 15:34             ` Greg KH
2026-02-13 15:45               ` Boqun Feng
2026-02-13 15:58                 ` Greg KH
2026-02-13 16:19                   ` Boqun Feng
2026-02-17  9:13                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17  9:33                       ` Alice Ryhl
2026-02-17  9:45                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17 10:01                           ` Alice Ryhl
2026-02-17 10:25                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17 10:47                               ` Alice Ryhl
2026-02-17 11:09                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17 11:51                                   ` Alice Ryhl
2026-02-17 12:09                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17 13:00                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17 13:54                                         ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-17 15:50                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17 16:10                                             ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-17 13:09                                       ` Alice Ryhl
2026-02-17 15:48                                         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-02-17 23:39                                           ` Gary Guo
2026-02-18  8:37                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-18  9:31                                               ` Alice Ryhl
2026-02-18 10:09                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17 13:56                                     ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-02-17 16:04                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17 18:43                                         ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-02-17 20:32                                           ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-17 15:52                       ` Boqun Feng
2026-02-17  9:17                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17  9:23                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17  9:37                     ` Alice Ryhl
2026-02-17 10:01                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-17  9:33                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-14  0:07               ` Gary Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260217154800.GY2995752@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox