From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
david@kernel.org, osalvador@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: name the anonymous MMOP enum as enum mmop
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 10:13:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260212181325.riolqzwvhqjmv6mk@offworld> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260211215447.2194189-1-gourry@gourry.net>
On Wed, 11 Feb 2026, Gregory Price wrote:
>Give the MMOP enum (MMOP_OFFLINE, MMOP_ONLINE, etc) a proper type
>name so the compiler can help catch invalid values being assigned to
>variables of this type.
>
>Leave the existing functions returning int alone to allow for
>value-or-error pattern to remain unchanged without churn.
>
>mmop_default_online_type is left as int because it uses the -1
>sentinal value to signal it hasn't been initialized yet.
>
>Keep the uint8_t buffer in offline_and_remove_memory() as-is for
>space efficiency, with an explicit cast when we consume the value.
>
>Move the enum definition before the CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG guard so
>it is unconditionally available for struct memory_block in memory.h.
>
>No functional change.
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-12 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-11 21:54 Gregory Price
2026-02-11 22:18 ` Cheatham, Benjamin
2026-02-12 16:33 ` Gregory Price
2026-02-12 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-12 16:03 ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-12 18:13 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2026-02-19 11:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260212181325.riolqzwvhqjmv6mk@offworld \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox