From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E056E9E305 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 13:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 739756B0089; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:43:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 700AF6B008C; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:43:38 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5E2AD6B0092; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:43:38 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464416B0089 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:43:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008401B3914 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 13:43:37 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84432293274.01.AA146DB Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9BD14000E for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 13:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Q5t7GOyd; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1770817416; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=x3/s/BMwwAmSTETu2e8y/u3D++EfQzrHzCEzcz82YV8=; b=pOEtN9qKFtVOSsbllOyVvZnpFIg+9ossl67yjqjohUxVEj/8cp1jqB7QQn5DJddL/99tLW U2iWIgdrv77YyZdWKXZ3mmC+GYur68GQr9PqemkUdqc5+9DahumRmmrcWzQiw2sIJJ268+ BeAEcnjjn5Nmli/aTLoPKIsvRXzNxhg= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1770817416; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=w+c7QkIfMGs1WwzFVpPqM7r3+GS+w9FxJtq2njie6btJPviRTzXu/zMqCerj6fGZ2H/yTh Ll0JdMPi1bPeijgAkXpn82iAAm5exAdvtSHJ1En00GpvgSfFJpA7pDsUhaQQf2NmJwoe5t VVrqzKFBQML2Fyt/tpvX/3iwcttP6NA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Q5t7GOyd; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770817415; x=1802353415; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=wEJz6UAJ/YDJm9FyFpIp7xlD4O0stl9h6zZkBnYZOxY=; b=Q5t7GOydXoWy25aSrUdO2gMdyj+le/u6AM/ZoBR/+1CleyjNsZichrQf ouov2B6z4O8AMDAd1UvDLouKr8RFpFon7gKYBfMamGSvoalS5ZdwnJa28 yu6DF464WxZmYpdhLHGucYCyKmHMWk8AyvDlP9y7ilzaE7IJo9rPfLbWR qJI1NS9l88RrT4mSX3ij2gMfoBuJH1sFogsvlPMfL8ii5E5aIoDawjlfW f9jS/54ljbRQcBPva0R6eo7tqMqcQyDtYsMM3KABMb6bD/T4kHWtU4qOQ F5/ycaSVen3tDBoc52xFe8f7zc6IlurD5e3m/cxP2//XxEcILOTKzATVF w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gPBke6QMQXC9jVTuICg+kQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wVJ0dNW0T02L/rkTQreFcA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11698"; a="72007569" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,283,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="72007569" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2026 05:43:33 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: R3H5VLSkRWCLn8vcnT5v2A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: n5aq+60TScCI4U8b3U0n8A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,283,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="216757612" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO e5404a91d123) ([10.211.93.152]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2026 05:43:26 -0800 Received: from kbuild by e5404a91d123 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vqAV2-0000000015Z-01aG; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 13:43:24 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:42:24 +0100 From: kernel test robot To: Nhat Pham , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, yosry.ahmed@linux.dev, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev, len.brown@intel.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev, kasong@tencent.com, chrisl@kernel.org, huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, baohua@kernel.org, bhe@redhat.com, osalvador@suse.de, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, pavel@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, riel@surriel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/20] mm: swap: allocate a virtual swap slot for each swapped out page Message-ID: <202602111445.rP38hmwx-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260208215839.87595-10-nphamcs@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260208215839.87595-10-nphamcs@gmail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8F9BD14000E X-Stat-Signature: s9b5psgsnrxupzff7b1jrw7ponnuutgk X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-HE-Tag: 1770817415-90356 X-HE-Meta: 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Nhat, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 05f7e89ab9731565d8a62e3b5d1ec206485eeb0b] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Nhat-Pham/mm-swap-decouple-swap-cache-from-physical-swap-infrastructure/20260209-120606 base: 05f7e89ab9731565d8a62e3b5d1ec206485eeb0b patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260208215839.87595-10-nphamcs%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 09/20] mm: swap: allocate a virtual swap slot for each swapped out page config: x86_64-rhel-9.4 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260211/202602111445.rP38hmwx-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260211/202602111445.rP38hmwx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602111445.rP38hmwx-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/local_lock.h:5, from include/linux/mmzone.h:24, from include/linux/gfp.h:7, from include/linux/mm.h:7, from mm/vswap.c:7: mm/vswap.c: In function 'vswap_cpu_dead': >> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:221:45: error: initialization from pointer to non-enclosed address space 221 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ | ^ include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:105:40: note: in definition of macro '__local_lock_acquire' 105 | __l = (local_lock_t *)(lock); \ | ^~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:17:41: note: in expansion of macro '__local_lock' 17 | #define local_lock(lock) __local_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:245:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr' 245 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:256:27: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_ptr' 256 | #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) raw_cpu_ptr(ptr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:17:54: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_ptr' 17 | #define local_lock(lock) __local_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vswap.c:653:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_lock' 653 | local_lock(&percpu_cluster->lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:221:45: note: expected 'const __seg_gs void *' but pointer is of type 'local_lock_t *' 221 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ | ^ include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:105:40: note: in definition of macro '__local_lock_acquire' 105 | __l = (local_lock_t *)(lock); \ | ^~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:17:41: note: in expansion of macro '__local_lock' 17 | #define local_lock(lock) __local_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:245:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr' 245 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:256:27: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_ptr' 256 | #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) raw_cpu_ptr(ptr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:17:54: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_ptr' 17 | #define local_lock(lock) __local_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vswap.c:653:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_lock' 653 | local_lock(&percpu_cluster->lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:221:45: error: initialization from pointer to non-enclosed address space 221 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ | ^ include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:107:27: note: in definition of macro '__local_lock_acquire' 107 | _Generic((lock), \ | ^~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:17:41: note: in expansion of macro '__local_lock' 17 | #define local_lock(lock) __local_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:245:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr' 245 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:256:27: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_ptr' 256 | #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) raw_cpu_ptr(ptr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:17:54: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_ptr' 17 | #define local_lock(lock) __local_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vswap.c:653:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_lock' 653 | local_lock(&percpu_cluster->lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:221:45: note: expected 'const __seg_gs void *' but pointer is of type 'local_lock_t *' 221 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ | ^ include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:107:27: note: in definition of macro '__local_lock_acquire' 107 | _Generic((lock), \ | ^~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:17:41: note: in expansion of macro '__local_lock' 17 | #define local_lock(lock) __local_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:245:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr' 245 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:256:27: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_ptr' 256 | #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) raw_cpu_ptr(ptr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:17:54: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_ptr' 17 | #define local_lock(lock) __local_lock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vswap.c:653:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_lock' 653 | local_lock(&percpu_cluster->lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:221:45: error: initialization from pointer to non-enclosed address space 221 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ | ^ include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:176:40: note: in definition of macro '__local_lock_release' 176 | __l = (local_lock_t *)(lock); \ | ^~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:38:41: note: in expansion of macro '__local_unlock' 38 | #define local_unlock(lock) __local_unlock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:245:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr' 245 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:256:27: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_ptr' 256 | #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) raw_cpu_ptr(ptr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:38:56: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_ptr' 38 | #define local_unlock(lock) __local_unlock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vswap.c:665:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_unlock' 665 | local_unlock(&percpu_cluster->lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:221:45: note: expected 'const __seg_gs void *' but pointer is of type 'local_lock_t *' 221 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ | ^ include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:176:40: note: in definition of macro '__local_lock_release' 176 | __l = (local_lock_t *)(lock); \ | ^~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:38:41: note: in expansion of macro '__local_unlock' 38 | #define local_unlock(lock) __local_unlock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:245:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr' 245 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:256:27: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_ptr' 256 | #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) raw_cpu_ptr(ptr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:38:56: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_ptr' 38 | #define local_unlock(lock) __local_unlock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vswap.c:665:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_unlock' 665 | local_unlock(&percpu_cluster->lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:221:45: error: initialization from pointer to non-enclosed address space 221 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ | ^ include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:179:27: note: in definition of macro '__local_lock_release' 179 | _Generic((lock), \ | ^~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:38:41: note: in expansion of macro '__local_unlock' 38 | #define local_unlock(lock) __local_unlock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:245:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr' 245 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:256:27: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_ptr' 256 | #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) raw_cpu_ptr(ptr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:38:56: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_ptr' 38 | #define local_unlock(lock) __local_unlock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vswap.c:665:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_unlock' 665 | local_unlock(&percpu_cluster->lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:221:45: note: expected 'const __seg_gs void *' but pointer is of type 'local_lock_t *' 221 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ | ^ include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:179:27: note: in definition of macro '__local_lock_release' 179 | _Generic((lock), \ | ^~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:38:41: note: in expansion of macro '__local_unlock' 38 | #define local_unlock(lock) __local_unlock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:245:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr' 245 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/percpu-defs.h:256:27: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_ptr' 256 | #define this_cpu_ptr(ptr) raw_cpu_ptr(ptr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/local_lock.h:38:56: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_ptr' 38 | #define local_unlock(lock) __local_unlock(this_cpu_ptr(lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vswap.c:665:9: note: in expansion of macro 'local_unlock' 665 | local_unlock(&percpu_cluster->lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +221 include/linux/percpu-defs.h 62fde54123fb64 Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 207 9c28278a24c01c Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 208 /* 6fbc07bbe2b5a8 Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 209 * __verify_pcpu_ptr() verifies @ptr is a percpu pointer without evaluating 6fbc07bbe2b5a8 Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 210 * @ptr and is invoked once before a percpu area is accessed by all 6fbc07bbe2b5a8 Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 211 * accessors and operations. This is performed in the generic part of 6fbc07bbe2b5a8 Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 212 * percpu and arch overrides don't need to worry about it; however, if an 6fbc07bbe2b5a8 Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 213 * arch wants to implement an arch-specific percpu accessor or operation, 6fbc07bbe2b5a8 Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 214 * it may use __verify_pcpu_ptr() to verify the parameters. 9c28278a24c01c Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 215 * 9c28278a24c01c Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 216 * + 0 is required in order to convert the pointer type from a 9c28278a24c01c Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 217 * potential array type to a pointer to a single item of the array. 9c28278a24c01c Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 218 */ eba117889ac444 Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 219 #define __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr) \ eba117889ac444 Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 220 do { \ 9c28278a24c01c Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 @221 const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \ 9c28278a24c01c Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 222 (void)__vpp_verify; \ 9c28278a24c01c Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 223 } while (0) 9c28278a24c01c Tejun Heo 2014-06-17 224 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki