* [PATCH] mm/shmem: remove unnecessary restrain unmask of swap gfp flags
@ 2026-02-11 14:33 Kairui Song
2026-02-14 7:15 ` Baolin Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2026-02-11 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Andrew Morton, Hugh Dickins, Baolin Wang, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
The comment makes it look like copy-paste leftovers from
shmem_replace_folio. The first try of the swap doesn't always have a
limited zone.
So don't drop the restraint, which should make the GFP more accurate.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
---
mm/shmem.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index eaaeca8f6c39..4f34dfa95a50 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2043,14 +2043,8 @@ static struct folio *shmem_swap_alloc_folio(struct inode *inode,
struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
struct folio *new, *swapcache;
int nr_pages = 1 << order;
- gfp_t alloc_gfp;
+ gfp_t alloc_gfp = gfp;
- /*
- * We have arrived here because our zones are constrained, so don't
- * limit chance of success with further cpuset and node constraints.
- */
- gfp &= ~GFP_CONSTRAINT_MASK;
- alloc_gfp = gfp;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) {
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(order))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
---
base-commit: ad92386d5debbde551129dc85f0118f5a521388c
change-id: 20260211-shmem-swap-gfp-c68b9d73a90f
Best regards,
--
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/shmem: remove unnecessary restrain unmask of swap gfp flags
2026-02-11 14:33 [PATCH] mm/shmem: remove unnecessary restrain unmask of swap gfp flags Kairui Song
@ 2026-02-14 7:15 ` Baolin Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Baolin Wang @ 2026-02-14 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song, linux-mm
Cc: Andrew Morton, Hugh Dickins, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On 2/11/26 10:33 PM, Kairui Song wrote:
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> The comment makes it look like copy-paste leftovers from
> shmem_replace_folio. The first try of the swap doesn't always have a
> limited zone.
>
> So don't drop the restraint, which should make the GFP more accurate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> ---
Agree. Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> mm/shmem.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index eaaeca8f6c39..4f34dfa95a50 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -2043,14 +2043,8 @@ static struct folio *shmem_swap_alloc_folio(struct inode *inode,
> struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
> struct folio *new, *swapcache;
> int nr_pages = 1 << order;
> - gfp_t alloc_gfp;
> + gfp_t alloc_gfp = gfp;
>
> - /*
> - * We have arrived here because our zones are constrained, so don't
> - * limit chance of success with further cpuset and node constraints.
> - */
> - gfp &= ~GFP_CONSTRAINT_MASK;
> - alloc_gfp = gfp;
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)) {
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(order))
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> ---
> base-commit: ad92386d5debbde551129dc85f0118f5a521388c
> change-id: 20260211-shmem-swap-gfp-c68b9d73a90f
>
> Best regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-14 7:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-11 14:33 [PATCH] mm/shmem: remove unnecessary restrain unmask of swap gfp flags Kairui Song
2026-02-14 7:15 ` Baolin Wang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox