From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mm/slab: support kmalloc_nolock() -> kfree[_rcu]()
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 21:10:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260209121013.50475-1-harry.yoo@oracle.com> (raw)
This is separated from the RFC version of "k[v]free_rcu() improvements"
series [1], as these changes are relatively small and beneficial for BPF
because it enables the bpf code to use kfree_rcu() instead of
call_rcu() + kfree_nolock().
Hopefully we can get acks from kmemleak folks for kmemleak part in
patch 1, if it looks good for them.
Patch 1 allows kfree() and kfree_rcu() to be used with objects that are
allocated from kmalloc_nolock().
Patch 2 is a cleanup that frees a bit used to record whether obj_exts
was allocated using kmalloc_nolock() or kmalloc(), since now both cases
can be freed with kfree().
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260206093410.160622-1-harry.yoo@oracle.com
RFC -> v1:
- Added acked-bys from Alexei, thanks!
- Patch 1: While developing the RFC version, I mistakenly thought that
removing "Trying to color unknown object at ..." warning in
paint_ptr() became unnecessary after changing the kfree_rcu_nolock()
implementation several times, but during testing I discovered this is
still needed to silence the warning in kmalloc_nolock() -> kfree_rcu()
(-> kmemleak_ignore()) path.
So removed the warning in paint_ptr() again.
Harry Yoo (2):
mm/slab: allow freeing kmalloc_nolock()'d objects using kfree[_rcu]()
mm/slab: free a bit in enum objexts_flags
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 3 +--
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 4 ++--
mm/kmemleak.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
mm/slub.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
base-commit: f6ed7e47c1fc78e78c9bfeb668b1ad9ba5c58120
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-02-09 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-09 12:10 Harry Yoo [this message]
2026-02-09 12:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/slab: allow freeing kmalloc_nolock()'d objects using kfree[_rcu]() Harry Yoo
2026-02-09 18:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-02-10 1:50 ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-09 12:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/slab: free a bit in enum objexts_flags Harry Yoo
2026-02-10 1:44 ` Harry Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260209121013.50475-1-harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox