* [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch userptr allocation support
@ 2026-02-09 6:10 Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/amdkfd: Add userptr batch allocation UAPI structures Honglei Huang
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Honglei Huang @ 2026-02-09 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix.Kuehling, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, Philip.Yang,
Ray.Huang
Cc: dmitry.osipenko, airlied, daniel, amd-gfx, dri-devel,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, akpm, honghuan
From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
Hi all,
This is v4 of the patch series to support allocating multiple non-contiguous
CPU virtual address ranges that map to a single contiguous GPU virtual address.
v4:
1. Fixed hmm_range.notifier_seq limitation: add per-range 'valid' flag
- Use explicit 'valid' flag instead of notifier seq in user_range_info
to track whether each range's pages are valid or have been invalidated
2. Fixed mmap_read_lock usage: hold mmap_read_lock across entire batch
page fault operation instead of per-range locking
- Renamed get_user_pages_batch() to get_user_pages_batch_locked()
- Caller now holds mmap_read_lock for entire batch operation
3. Improved error handling: Better cleanup paths and error messages
v3:
1. No new ioctl: Reuses existing AMDKFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEMORY_OF_GPU
- Adds only one flag: KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR_BATCH
- When flag is set, mmap_offset field points to range array
- Minimal API surface change
2. Improved MMU notifier handling:
- Single mmu_interval_notifier covering the VA span [va_min, va_max]
- Interval tree for efficient lookup of affected ranges during invalidation
- Avoids per-range notifier overhead mentioned in v2 review
3. Better code organization: Split into 8 focused patches for easier review
v2:
- Each CPU VA range gets its own mmu_interval_notifier for invalidation
- All ranges validated together and mapped to contiguous GPU VA
- Single kgd_mem object with array of user_range_info structures
- Unified eviction/restore path for all ranges in a batch
Current Implementation Approach
===============================
This series implements a practical solution within existing kernel constraints:
1. Single MMU notifier for VA span: Register one notifier covering the
entire range from lowest to highest address in the batch
2. Interval tree filtering: Use interval tree to efficiently identify
which specific ranges are affected during invalidation callbacks,
avoiding unnecessary processing for unrelated address changes
3. Unified eviction/restore: All ranges in a batch share eviction and
restore paths, maintaining consistency with existing userptr handling
Patch Series Overview
=====================
Patch 1/8: Add userptr batch allocation UAPI structures
- KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR_BATCH flag
- kfd_ioctl_userptr_range and kfd_ioctl_userptr_ranges_data structures
Patch 2/8: Add user_range_info infrastructure to kgd_mem
- user_range_info structure for per-range tracking
- Fields for batch allocation in kgd_mem
Patch 3/8: Implement interval tree for userptr ranges
- Interval tree for efficient range lookup during invalidation
- mark_invalid_ranges() function
Patch 4/8: Add batch MMU notifier support
- Single notifier for entire VA span
- Invalidation callback using interval tree filtering
Patch 5/8: Implement batch userptr page management
- get_user_pages_batch_locked() and set_user_pages_batch()
- Per-range page array management
Patch 6/8: Add batch allocation function and export API
- init_user_pages_batch() main initialization
- amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu_batch() entry point
Patch 7/8: Unify userptr cleanup and update paths
- Shared eviction/restore handling for batch allocations
- Integration with existing userptr validation flows
Patch 8/8: Wire up batch allocation in ioctl handler
- Input validation and range array parsing
- Integration with existing alloc_memory_of_gpu path
Testing
=======
- Multiple scattered malloc() allocations (2-4000+ ranges)
- Various allocation sizes (4KB to 1G+ per range)
- Memory pressure scenarios and eviction/restore cycles
- OpenCL CTS and HIP catch tests in KVM guest environment
- AI workloads: Stable Diffusion, ComfyUI in virtualized environments
- Small LLM inference (3B-7B models)
- Benchmark score: 160,000 - 190,000 (80%-95% of bare metal)
- Performance improvement: 2x-2.4x faster than userspace approach
Thank you for your review and feedback.
Best regards,
Honglei Huang
Honglei Huang (8):
drm/amdkfd: Add userptr batch allocation UAPI structures
drm/amdkfd: Add user_range_info infrastructure to kgd_mem
drm/amdkfd: Implement interval tree for userptr ranges
drm/amdkfd: Add batch MMU notifier support
drm/amdkfd: Implement batch userptr page management
drm/amdkfd: Add batch allocation function and export API
drm/amdkfd: Unify userptr cleanup and update paths
drm/amdkfd: Wire up batch allocation in ioctl handler
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h | 23 +
.../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 559 +++++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c | 128 +++-
include/uapi/linux/kfd_ioctl.h | 31 +-
4 files changed, 717 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/amdkfd: Add userptr batch allocation UAPI structures
2026-02-09 6:10 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch userptr allocation support Honglei Huang
@ 2026-02-09 6:10 ` Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/amdkfd: Add user_range_info infrastructure to kgd_mem Honglei Huang
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Honglei Huang @ 2026-02-09 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix.Kuehling, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, Philip.Yang,
Ray.Huang
Cc: dmitry.osipenko, airlied, daniel, amd-gfx, dri-devel,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, akpm, honghuan
From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
Introduce new UAPI structures to support batch allocation of
non-contiguous userptr ranges in a single ioctl call.
add:
- KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR_BATCH flag
- struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_range for individual ranges
- struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_ranges_data for batch data
Signed-off-by: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/kfd_ioctl.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kfd_ioctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/kfd_ioctl.h
index 84aa24c02..579850e70 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kfd_ioctl.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kfd_ioctl.h
@@ -420,16 +420,45 @@ struct kfd_ioctl_acquire_vm_args {
#define KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_UNCACHED (1 << 25)
#define KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_EXT_COHERENT (1 << 24)
#define KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_CONTIGUOUS (1 << 23)
+#define KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR_BATCH (1 << 22)
+
+/* Userptr range for batch allocation
+ *
+ * @start: start address of user virtual memory range
+ * @size: size of this user virtual memory range in bytes
+ */
+struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_range {
+ __u64 start; /* to KFD */
+ __u64 size; /* to KFD */
+};
+
+/* Complete userptr batch allocation data structure
+ *
+ * This structure combines the header and ranges array for convenience.
+ * User space can allocate memory for this structure with the desired
+ * number of ranges and pass a pointer to it via mmap_offset field.
+ *
+ * @num_ranges: number of ranges in the ranges array
+ * @reserved: reserved for future use, must be 0
+ * @ranges: flexible array of userptr ranges
+ */
+struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_ranges_data {
+ __u32 num_ranges; /* to KFD */
+ __u32 reserved; /* to KFD, must be 0 */
+ struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_range ranges[]; /* to KFD */
+};
/* Allocate memory for later SVM (shared virtual memory) mapping.
*
* @va_addr: virtual address of the memory to be allocated
* all later mappings on all GPUs will use this address
- * @size: size in bytes
+ * @size: size in bytes (total size for batch allocation)
* @handle: buffer handle returned to user mode, used to refer to
* this allocation for mapping, unmapping and freeing
* @mmap_offset: for CPU-mapping the allocation by mmapping a render node
* for userptrs this is overloaded to specify the CPU address
+ * for batch userptr (KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR_BATCH),
+ * this should point to a kfd_ioctl_userptr_ranges_data structure
* @gpu_id: device identifier
* @flags: memory type and attributes. See KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS above
*/
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/amdkfd: Add user_range_info infrastructure to kgd_mem
2026-02-09 6:10 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch userptr allocation support Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/amdkfd: Add userptr batch allocation UAPI structures Honglei Huang
@ 2026-02-09 6:10 ` Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/amdkfd: Implement interval tree for userptr ranges Honglei Huang
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Honglei Huang @ 2026-02-09 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix.Kuehling, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, Philip.Yang,
Ray.Huang
Cc: dmitry.osipenko, airlied, daniel, amd-gfx, dri-devel,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, akpm, honghuan
From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
Add data structures to support batch userptr allocations with
multiple non-contiguous CPU virtual address ranges.
add:
- struct user_range_info: per-range metadata including HMM range,
invalidation counter, and interval tree node
- Fields to kgd_mem: num_user_ranges, user_ranges array,
batch_va_min/max, batch_notifier, and user_ranges_itree
Signed-off-by: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
index 321cbf9a1..5b6d399f5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ enum TLB_FLUSH_TYPE {
struct amdgpu_device;
struct kfd_process_device;
+struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_range;
struct amdgpu_reset_context;
enum kfd_mem_attachment_type {
@@ -67,6 +68,15 @@ struct kfd_mem_attachment {
uint64_t pte_flags;
};
+/* Individual range info for batch userptr allocations */
+struct user_range_info {
+ uint64_t start; /* CPU virtual address start */
+ uint64_t size; /* Size in bytes */
+ struct hmm_range *range; /* HMM range for this userptr */
+ bool valid; /* Flag: true if pages are valid, false if invalidated */
+ struct interval_tree_node it_node; /* Interval tree node for fast overlap lookup */
+};
+
struct kgd_mem {
struct mutex lock;
struct amdgpu_bo *bo;
@@ -89,6 +99,14 @@ struct kgd_mem {
uint32_t gem_handle;
bool aql_queue;
bool is_imported;
+
+ /* For batch userptr allocation: multiple non-contiguous CPU VA ranges */
+ uint32_t num_user_ranges;
+ struct user_range_info *user_ranges;
+ uint64_t batch_va_min;
+ uint64_t batch_va_max;
+ struct mmu_interval_notifier batch_notifier;
+ struct rb_root_cached user_ranges_itree;
};
/* KFD Memory Eviction */
@@ -313,6 +331,11 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu(
struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint64_t va, uint64_t size,
void *drm_priv, struct kgd_mem **mem,
uint64_t *offset, uint32_t flags, bool criu_resume);
+int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu_batch(
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint64_t va, uint64_t size,
+ void *drm_priv, struct kgd_mem **mem,
+ uint64_t *offset, struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_range *ranges,
+ uint32_t num_ranges, uint32_t flags, bool criu_resume);
int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu(
struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem, void *drm_priv,
uint64_t *size);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/amdkfd: Implement interval tree for userptr ranges
2026-02-09 6:10 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch userptr allocation support Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/amdkfd: Add userptr batch allocation UAPI structures Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/amdkfd: Add user_range_info infrastructure to kgd_mem Honglei Huang
@ 2026-02-09 6:10 ` Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch MMU notifier support Honglei Huang
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Honglei Huang @ 2026-02-09 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix.Kuehling, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, Philip.Yang,
Ray.Huang
Cc: dmitry.osipenko, airlied, daniel, amd-gfx, dri-devel,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, akpm, honghuan
From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
Add interval tree support for efficient lookup of affected userptr
ranges during MMU notifier callbacks.
add:
- Include linux/interval_tree.h
- discard_invalid_ranges() function that uses interval tree to
identify and mark ranges affected by a given invalidation event
Signed-off-by: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
index a32b46355..6fe4ed22c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
#include <linux/sched/task.h>
+#include <linux/interval_tree.h>
#include <drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h>
#include <drm/drm_exec.h>
@@ -1122,6 +1123,26 @@ static int init_user_pages(struct kgd_mem *mem, uint64_t user_addr,
return ret;
}
+static bool discard_invalid_ranges(struct kgd_mem *mem,
+ unsigned long inv_start, unsigned long inv_end)
+{
+ struct interval_tree_node *node;
+ struct user_range_info *range_info;
+ bool any_invalid = false;
+
+ for (node = interval_tree_iter_first(&mem->user_ranges_itree, inv_start, inv_end - 1);
+ node;
+ node = interval_tree_iter_next(node, inv_start, inv_end - 1)) {
+ range_info = container_of(node, struct user_range_info, it_node);
+
+ range_info->valid = false;
+ any_invalid = true;
+ pr_debug("Range [0x%llx-0x%llx) marked invalid\n",
+ range_info->start, range_info->start + range_info->size);
+ }
+ return any_invalid;
+}
+
/* Reserving a BO and its page table BOs must happen atomically to
* avoid deadlocks. Some operations update multiple VMs at once. Track
* all the reservation info in a context structure. Optionally a sync
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch MMU notifier support
2026-02-09 6:10 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch userptr allocation support Honglei Huang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/amdkfd: Implement interval tree for userptr ranges Honglei Huang
@ 2026-02-09 6:10 ` Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/amdkfd: Implement batch userptr page management Honglei Huang
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Honglei Huang @ 2026-02-09 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix.Kuehling, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, Philip.Yang,
Ray.Huang
Cc: dmitry.osipenko, airlied, daniel, amd-gfx, dri-devel,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, akpm, honghuan
From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
Implement MMU notifier callbacks for batch userptr allocations.
This adds:
- amdgpu_amdkfd_evict_userptr_batch(): handles MMU invalidation
events for batch allocations, using interval tree to identify
affected ranges
Signed-off-by: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
index 6fe4ed22c..a22a99b8d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
@@ -1143,6 +1143,65 @@ static bool discard_invalid_ranges(struct kgd_mem *mem,
return any_invalid;
}
+static int amdgpu_amdkfd_evict_userptr_batch(struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni,
+ const struct mmu_notifier_range *range,
+ unsigned long cur_seq)
+{
+ struct kgd_mem *mem;
+ struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info;
+ int r = 0;
+
+ mem = container_of(mni, struct kgd_mem, batch_notifier);
+ process_info = mem->process_info;
+
+ if (READ_ONCE(process_info->block_mmu_notifications))
+ return 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
+ mmu_interval_set_seq(mni, cur_seq);
+
+ /* Discard affected ranges under notifier_lock for atomicity */
+ if (!discard_invalid_ranges(mem, range->start, range->end)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
+ pr_debug("Batch userptr: invalidation [0x%lx-0x%lx) does not affect any range\n",
+ range->start, range->end);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ mem->invalid++;
+
+ if (++process_info->evicted_bos == 1) {
+ r = kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm(mni->mm,
+ KFD_QUEUE_EVICTION_TRIGGER_USERPTR);
+
+ if (r && r != -ESRCH)
+ pr_err("Failed to quiesce KFD\n");
+
+ if (r != -ESRCH)
+ queue_delayed_work(system_freezable_wq,
+ &process_info->restore_userptr_work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(AMDGPU_USERPTR_RESTORE_DELAY_MS));
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
+
+ pr_debug("Batch userptr evicted: va_min=0x%llx va_max=0x%llx, inv_range=[0x%lx-0x%lx)\n",
+ mem->batch_va_min, mem->batch_va_max, range->start, range->end);
+
+ return r;
+}
+
+static bool amdgpu_amdkfd_invalidate_userptr_batch(struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni,
+ const struct mmu_notifier_range *range,
+ unsigned long cur_seq)
+{
+ amdgpu_amdkfd_evict_userptr_batch(mni, range, cur_seq);
+ return true;
+}
+
+static const struct mmu_interval_notifier_ops amdgpu_amdkfd_hsa_batch_ops = {
+ .invalidate = amdgpu_amdkfd_invalidate_userptr_batch,
+};
+
/* Reserving a BO and its page table BOs must happen atomically to
* avoid deadlocks. Some operations update multiple VMs at once. Track
* all the reservation info in a context structure. Optionally a sync
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/amdkfd: Implement batch userptr page management
2026-02-09 6:10 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch userptr allocation support Honglei Huang
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch MMU notifier support Honglei Huang
@ 2026-02-09 6:10 ` Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch allocation function and export API Honglei Huang
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Honglei Huang @ 2026-02-09 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix.Kuehling, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, Philip.Yang,
Ray.Huang
Cc: dmitry.osipenko, airlied, daniel, amd-gfx, dri-devel,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, akpm, honghuan
From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
Add core page management functions for batch userptr allocations.
This adds:
- get_user_pages_batch_locked(): gets user pages for batch
- set_user_pages_batch(): populates TTM page array from multiple
HMM ranges
Signed-off-by: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
index a22a99b8d..5f10a4514 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
@@ -1202,6 +1202,51 @@ static const struct mmu_interval_notifier_ops amdgpu_amdkfd_hsa_batch_ops = {
.invalidate = amdgpu_amdkfd_invalidate_userptr_batch,
};
+static int get_user_pages_batch_locked(struct mm_struct *mm,
+ struct kgd_mem *mem,
+ struct user_range_info *range,
+ struct hmm_range **range_hmm,
+ bool readonly)
+{
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+ int r;
+
+ *range_hmm = NULL;
+
+ vma = vma_lookup(mm, range->start);
+ if (unlikely(!vma))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ r = amdgpu_hmm_range_get_pages(&mem->batch_notifier, range->start,
+ range->size >> PAGE_SHIFT, readonly,
+ NULL, range_hmm);
+ return r;
+}
+
+static int set_user_pages_batch(struct ttm_tt *ttm,
+ struct user_range_info *ranges,
+ uint32_t nranges)
+{
+ uint32_t i, j, k = 0, range_npfns;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nranges; ++i) {
+ if (!ranges[i].range || !ranges[i].range->hmm_pfns)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ range_npfns = (ranges[i].range->end - ranges[i].range->start) >>
+ PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ if (k + range_npfns > ttm->num_pages)
+ return -EOVERFLOW;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < range_npfns; ++j)
+ ttm->pages[k++] =
+ hmm_pfn_to_page(ranges[i].range->hmm_pfns[j]);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* Reserving a BO and its page table BOs must happen atomically to
* avoid deadlocks. Some operations update multiple VMs at once. Track
* all the reservation info in a context structure. Optionally a sync
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch allocation function and export API
2026-02-09 6:10 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch userptr allocation support Honglei Huang
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/amdkfd: Implement batch userptr page management Honglei Huang
@ 2026-02-09 6:10 ` Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/amdkfd: Unify userptr cleanup and update paths Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/amdkfd: Wire up batch allocation in ioctl handler Honglei Huang
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Honglei Huang @ 2026-02-09 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix.Kuehling, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, Philip.Yang,
Ray.Huang
Cc: dmitry.osipenko, airlied, daniel, amd-gfx, dri-devel,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, akpm, honghuan
From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
Implement the main batch userptr allocation function and export it
through the AMDKFD API.
This adds:
- init_user_pages_batch(): initializes batch allocation by setting
up interval tree, registering single MMU notifier, and getting
pages for all ranges
- amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu_batch(): main entry point
for batch userptr allocation
- Function export in amdgpu_amdkfd.h
Signed-off-by: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 276 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 276 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
index 5f10a4514..c2fc31964 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
@@ -1247,6 +1247,163 @@ static int set_user_pages_batch(struct ttm_tt *ttm,
return 0;
}
+static int init_user_pages_batch(struct kgd_mem *mem,
+ struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_range *ranges,
+ uint32_t num_ranges, bool criu_resume,
+ uint64_t user_addr, uint32_t size)
+{
+ struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info = mem->process_info;
+ struct amdgpu_bo *bo = mem->bo;
+ struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { true, false };
+ struct hmm_range *range;
+ uint64_t va_min = ULLONG_MAX, va_max = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
+ uint32_t i;
+
+ if (!num_ranges || !ranges)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ mutex_lock(&process_info->lock);
+
+ mem->user_ranges = kvcalloc(num_ranges, sizeof(struct user_range_info),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ if (!mem->user_ranges) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ mem->num_user_ranges = num_ranges;
+
+ mem->user_ranges_itree = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
+
+ ret = amdgpu_ttm_tt_set_userptr(&bo->tbo, user_addr, 0);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to set userptr: %d\n", __func__, ret);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_ranges; i++) {
+ uint64_t range_end;
+
+ mem->user_ranges[i].start = ranges[i].start;
+ mem->user_ranges[i].size = ranges[i].size;
+ mem->user_ranges[i].range = NULL;
+ mem->user_ranges[i].valid = false;
+
+ range_end = ranges[i].start + ranges[i].size;
+
+ mem->user_ranges[i].it_node.start = ranges[i].start;
+ mem->user_ranges[i].it_node.last = range_end - 1;
+ interval_tree_insert(&mem->user_ranges[i].it_node, &mem->user_ranges_itree);
+
+ if (ranges[i].start < va_min)
+ va_min = ranges[i].start;
+ if (range_end > va_max)
+ va_max = range_end;
+
+ pr_debug("Initializing userptr range %u: addr=0x%llx size=0x%llx\n",
+ i, mem->user_ranges[i].start, mem->user_ranges[i].size);
+ }
+
+ mem->batch_va_min = va_min;
+ mem->batch_va_max = va_max;
+
+ pr_debug("Batch userptr: registering single notifier for span [0x%llx - 0x%llx)\n",
+ va_min, va_max);
+
+ ret = mmu_interval_notifier_insert(&mem->batch_notifier,
+ current->mm, va_min, va_max - va_min,
+ &amdgpu_amdkfd_hsa_batch_ops);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to register batch MMU notifier: %d\n",
+ __func__, ret);
+ goto err_cleanup_ranges;
+ }
+
+ if (criu_resume) {
+ mutex_lock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
+ mem->invalid++;
+ mutex_unlock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&process_info->lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (!mmget_not_zero(current->mm)) {
+ ret = -ESRCH;
+ goto err_unregister;
+ }
+
+ mmap_read_lock(current->mm);
+ for (i = 0; i < num_ranges; i++) {
+ ret = get_user_pages_batch_locked(
+ current->mm, mem, &mem->user_ranges[i], &range,
+ amdgpu_ttm_tt_is_readonly(bo->tbo.ttm));
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret == -EAGAIN)
+ pr_debug("Failed to get user pages for range %u, try again\n", i);
+ else
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to get user pages for range %u: %d\n",
+ __func__, i, ret);
+ mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
+ mmput(current->mm);
+ goto err_unregister;
+ }
+
+ mem->user_ranges[i].range = range;
+ mem->user_ranges[i].valid = true;
+ }
+ mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
+ mmput(current->mm);
+
+ ret = amdgpu_bo_reserve(bo, true);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to reserve BO\n", __func__);
+ goto release_pages;
+ }
+
+ if (bo->tbo.ttm->pages) {
+ set_user_pages_batch(bo->tbo.ttm,
+ mem->user_ranges,
+ num_ranges);
+ } else {
+ pr_err("%s: TTM pages array is NULL\n", __func__);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ amdgpu_bo_unreserve(bo);
+ goto release_pages;
+ }
+
+ amdgpu_bo_placement_from_domain(bo, mem->domain);
+ ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
+ if (ret)
+ pr_err("%s: failed to validate BO\n", __func__);
+
+ amdgpu_bo_unreserve(bo);
+
+release_pages:
+ for (i = 0; i < num_ranges; i++) {
+ if (mem->user_ranges[i].range) {
+ amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages_done(bo->tbo.ttm,
+ mem->user_ranges[i].range);
+ }
+ }
+
+err_unregister:
+ if (ret && mem->batch_notifier.mm) {
+ mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&mem->batch_notifier);
+ mem->batch_notifier.mm = NULL;
+ }
+err_cleanup_ranges:
+ if (ret) {
+ for (i = 0; i < num_ranges; i++) {
+ mem->user_ranges[i].range = NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&process_info->lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
/* Reserving a BO and its page table BOs must happen atomically to
* avoid deadlocks. Some operations update multiple VMs at once. Track
* all the reservation info in a context structure. Optionally a sync
@@ -2005,6 +2162,125 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu(
return ret;
}
+int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu_batch(
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint64_t va, uint64_t size, void *drm_priv,
+ struct kgd_mem **mem, uint64_t *offset,
+ struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_range *ranges, uint32_t num_ranges,
+ uint32_t flags, bool criu_resume)
+{
+ struct amdgpu_vm *avm = drm_priv_to_vm(drm_priv);
+ struct amdgpu_bo *bo;
+ struct drm_gem_object *gobj = NULL;
+ u32 domain, alloc_domain;
+ uint64_t aligned_size;
+ int8_t xcp_id = -1;
+ u64 alloc_flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!(flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR)) {
+ pr_err("Batch allocation requires USERPTR flag\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_AQL_QUEUE_MEM) {
+ pr_err("Batch userptr does not support AQL queue\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ domain = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT;
+ alloc_domain = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU;
+ alloc_flags = AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_PREEMPTIBLE;
+
+ if (flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_COHERENT)
+ alloc_flags |= AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_COHERENT;
+ if (flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_EXT_COHERENT)
+ alloc_flags |= AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_EXT_COHERENT;
+ if (flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_UNCACHED)
+ alloc_flags |= AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_UNCACHED;
+
+ *mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kgd_mem), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!*mem) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err;
+ }
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(*mem)->attachments);
+ mutex_init(&(*mem)->lock);
+ (*mem)->aql_queue = false;
+
+ aligned_size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
+
+ (*mem)->alloc_flags = flags;
+
+ amdgpu_sync_create(&(*mem)->sync);
+
+ ret = amdgpu_amdkfd_reserve_mem_limit(adev, aligned_size, flags,
+ xcp_id);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_debug("Insufficient memory\n");
+ goto err_reserve_limit;
+ }
+
+ pr_debug("\tcreate BO VA 0x%llx size 0x%llx for batch userptr (ranges=%u)\n",
+ va, size, num_ranges);
+
+ ret = amdgpu_gem_object_create(adev, aligned_size, 1, alloc_domain, alloc_flags,
+ ttm_bo_type_device, NULL, &gobj, xcp_id + 1);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_debug("Failed to create BO on domain %s. ret %d\n",
+ domain_string(alloc_domain), ret);
+ goto err_bo_create;
+ }
+
+ ret = drm_vma_node_allow(&gobj->vma_node, drm_priv);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_debug("Failed to allow vma node access. ret %d\n", ret);
+ goto err_node_allow;
+ }
+
+ ret = drm_gem_handle_create(adev->kfd.client.file, gobj, &(*mem)->gem_handle);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_gem_handle_create;
+
+ bo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(gobj);
+ bo->kfd_bo = *mem;
+ bo->flags |= AMDGPU_AMDKFD_CREATE_USERPTR_BO;
+
+ (*mem)->bo = bo;
+ (*mem)->va = va;
+ (*mem)->domain = domain;
+ (*mem)->mapped_to_gpu_memory = 0;
+ (*mem)->process_info = avm->process_info;
+
+ add_kgd_mem_to_kfd_bo_list(*mem, avm->process_info, ranges[0].start);
+
+ ret = init_user_pages_batch(*mem, ranges, num_ranges, criu_resume, va, aligned_size);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Failed to initialize batch user pages: %d\n", ret);
+ goto allocate_init_user_pages_failed;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+allocate_init_user_pages_failed:
+ remove_kgd_mem_from_kfd_bo_list(*mem, avm->process_info);
+ drm_gem_handle_delete(adev->kfd.client.file, (*mem)->gem_handle);
+err_gem_handle_create:
+ drm_vma_node_revoke(&gobj->vma_node, drm_priv);
+err_node_allow:
+ goto err_reserve_limit;
+err_bo_create:
+ amdgpu_amdkfd_unreserve_mem_limit(adev, aligned_size, flags, xcp_id);
+err_reserve_limit:
+ amdgpu_sync_free(&(*mem)->sync);
+ mutex_destroy(&(*mem)->lock);
+ if (gobj)
+ drm_gem_object_put(gobj);
+ else
+ kfree(*mem);
+err:
+ return ret;
+}
+
int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu(
struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem, void *drm_priv,
uint64_t *size)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/amdkfd: Unify userptr cleanup and update paths
2026-02-09 6:10 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch userptr allocation support Honglei Huang
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch allocation function and export API Honglei Huang
@ 2026-02-09 6:10 ` Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/amdkfd: Wire up batch allocation in ioctl handler Honglei Huang
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Honglei Huang @ 2026-02-09 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix.Kuehling, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, Philip.Yang,
Ray.Huang
Cc: dmitry.osipenko, airlied, daniel, amd-gfx, dri-devel,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, akpm, honghuan
From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
Refactor userptr management code to handle both single and batch
allocations uniformly.
This adds:
- cleanup_userptr_resources(): unified cleanup for single/batch
- discard_user_pages_batch(): discard pages for batch ranges
- amdgpu_amdkfd_update_user_pages_batch(): update pages for batch
- valid_user_pages_batch(): validate batch pages
Modified functions to support batch mode:
- update_invalid_user_pages(): uses batch update when applicable
- confirm_valid_user_pages_locked(): checks batch validity
- amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu(): uses unified cleanup
Signed-off-by: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 158 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 141 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
index c2fc31964..7233b127b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
@@ -2281,6 +2281,35 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu_batch(
return ret;
}
+static void cleanup_userptr_resources(struct kgd_mem *mem,
+ struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info)
+{
+ uint32_t i;
+
+ if (!amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_usermm(mem->bo->tbo.ttm))
+ return;
+
+ if (mem->num_user_ranges > 0 && mem->user_ranges) {
+ for (i = 0; i < mem->num_user_ranges; i++)
+ interval_tree_remove(&mem->user_ranges[i].it_node,
+ &mem->user_ranges_itree);
+
+ if (mem->batch_notifier.mm) {
+ mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&mem->batch_notifier);
+ mem->batch_notifier.mm = NULL;
+ }
+
+ kvfree(mem->user_ranges);
+ mem->user_ranges = NULL;
+ mem->num_user_ranges = 0;
+ } else {
+ amdgpu_hmm_unregister(mem->bo);
+ mutex_lock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
+ amdgpu_ttm_tt_discard_user_pages(mem->bo->tbo.ttm, mem->range);
+ mutex_unlock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
+ }
+}
+
int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu(
struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem, void *drm_priv,
uint64_t *size)
@@ -2322,12 +2351,7 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu(
mutex_unlock(&process_info->lock);
/* Cleanup user pages and MMU notifiers */
- if (amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_usermm(mem->bo->tbo.ttm)) {
- amdgpu_hmm_unregister(mem->bo);
- mutex_lock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
- amdgpu_ttm_tt_discard_user_pages(mem->bo->tbo.ttm, mem->range);
- mutex_unlock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
- }
+ cleanup_userptr_resources(mem, process_info);
ret = reserve_bo_and_cond_vms(mem, NULL, BO_VM_ALL, &ctx);
if (unlikely(ret))
@@ -2914,6 +2938,51 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_evict_userptr(struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni,
return r;
}
+static void discard_user_pages_batch(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, struct kgd_mem *mem)
+{
+ uint32_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mem->num_user_ranges; i++) {
+ if (!mem->user_ranges[i].valid && mem->user_ranges[i].range) {
+ amdgpu_ttm_tt_discard_user_pages(bo->tbo.ttm,
+ mem->user_ranges[i].range);
+ mem->user_ranges[i].range = NULL;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static int amdgpu_amdkfd_update_user_pages_batch(struct mm_struct *mm,
+ struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
+ struct kgd_mem *mem)
+{
+ uint32_t i;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (!mmget_not_zero(mm))
+ return -ESRCH;
+
+ mmap_read_lock(mm);
+ for (i = 0; i < mem->num_user_ranges; i++) {
+ if (mem->user_ranges[i].valid)
+ continue;
+
+ ret = get_user_pages_batch_locked(
+ mm, mem, &mem->user_ranges[i],
+ &mem->user_ranges[i].range, amdgpu_ttm_tt_is_readonly(bo->tbo.ttm));
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_debug("Failed %d to get user pages for range %u\n",
+ ret, i);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ mem->user_ranges[i].valid = true;
+ }
+ mmap_read_unlock(mm);
+ mmput(mm);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/* Update invalid userptr BOs
*
* Moves invalidated (evicted) userptr BOs from userptr_valid_list to
@@ -2928,6 +2997,7 @@ static int update_invalid_user_pages(struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info,
struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false };
uint32_t invalid;
int ret = 0;
+ uint32_t i;
mutex_lock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
@@ -2951,8 +3021,12 @@ static int update_invalid_user_pages(struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info,
bo = mem->bo;
- amdgpu_ttm_tt_discard_user_pages(bo->tbo.ttm, mem->range);
- mem->range = NULL;
+ if (mem->num_user_ranges > 0 && mem->user_ranges)
+ discard_user_pages_batch(bo, mem);
+ else {
+ amdgpu_ttm_tt_discard_user_pages(bo->tbo.ttm, mem->range);
+ mem->range = NULL;
+ }
/* BO reservations and getting user pages (hmm_range_fault)
* must happen outside the notifier lock
@@ -2976,7 +3050,11 @@ static int update_invalid_user_pages(struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info,
}
/* Get updated user pages */
- ret = amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages(bo, &mem->range);
+ if (mem->num_user_ranges > 0 && mem->user_ranges)
+ ret = amdgpu_amdkfd_update_user_pages_batch(mm, bo, mem);
+ else
+ ret = amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages(bo, &mem->range);
+
if (ret) {
pr_debug("Failed %d to get user pages\n", ret);
@@ -3010,7 +3088,10 @@ static int update_invalid_user_pages(struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info,
ret = 0;
}
- amdgpu_ttm_tt_set_user_pages(bo->tbo.ttm, mem->range);
+ if (mem->num_user_ranges == 0)
+ amdgpu_ttm_tt_set_user_pages(bo->tbo.ttm, mem->range);
+ else
+ set_user_pages_batch(bo->tbo.ttm, mem->user_ranges, mem->num_user_ranges);
mutex_lock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
@@ -3024,6 +3105,17 @@ static int update_invalid_user_pages(struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info,
/* set mem valid if mem has hmm range associated */
if (mem->range)
mem->invalid = 0;
+
+ /* For batch mode, clear global invalid counter and mark ranges as valid.
+ * Individual range validity is tracked by valid flag.
+ */
+ if (mem->num_user_ranges > 0 && mem->user_ranges) {
+ mem->invalid = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < mem->num_user_ranges; i++) {
+ if (mem->user_ranges[i].range)
+ mem->user_ranges[i].valid = true;
+ }
+ }
}
unlock_out:
@@ -3131,6 +3223,33 @@ static int validate_invalid_user_pages(struct amdkfd_process_info *process_info)
return ret;
}
+static bool valid_user_pages_batch(struct kgd_mem *mem)
+{
+ uint32_t i;
+ bool all_valid = true;
+
+ if (!mem->user_ranges || mem->num_user_ranges == 0)
+ return true;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mem->num_user_ranges; i++) {
+ if (!mem->user_ranges[i].valid) {
+ all_valid = false;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (!mem->user_ranges[i].range)
+ continue;
+
+ if (!amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages_done(
+ mem->bo->tbo.ttm, mem->user_ranges[i].range))
+ all_valid = false;
+
+ mem->user_ranges[i].range = NULL;
+ }
+
+ return all_valid;
+}
+
/* Confirm that all user pages are valid while holding the notifier lock
*
* Moves valid BOs from the userptr_inval_list back to userptr_val_list.
@@ -3145,15 +3264,20 @@ static int confirm_valid_user_pages_locked(struct amdkfd_process_info *process_i
validate_list) {
bool valid;
- /* keep mem without hmm range at userptr_inval_list */
- if (!mem->range)
- continue;
+ if (mem->num_user_ranges > 0 && mem->user_ranges)
+ valid = valid_user_pages_batch(mem);
+ else {
+ /* keep mem without hmm range at userptr_inval_list */
+ if (!mem->range)
+ continue;
- /* Only check mem with hmm range associated */
- valid = amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages_done(
- mem->bo->tbo.ttm, mem->range);
+ /* Only check mem with hmm range associated */
+ valid = amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages_done(
+ mem->bo->tbo.ttm, mem->range);
+
+ mem->range = NULL;
+ }
- mem->range = NULL;
if (!valid) {
WARN(!mem->invalid, "Invalid BO not marked invalid");
ret = -EAGAIN;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/amdkfd: Wire up batch allocation in ioctl handler
2026-02-09 6:10 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch userptr allocation support Honglei Huang
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/amdkfd: Unify userptr cleanup and update paths Honglei Huang
@ 2026-02-09 6:10 ` Honglei Huang
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Honglei Huang @ 2026-02-09 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix.Kuehling, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig, Philip.Yang,
Ray.Huang
Cc: dmitry.osipenko, airlied, daniel, amd-gfx, dri-devel,
linux-kernel, linux-mm, akpm, honghuan
From: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
Integrate batch userptr allocation into the KFD ioctl interface.
This adds:
- kfd_copy_userptr_ranges(): validates and copies batch range data
from userspace, checking alignment, sizes, and total size match
- Modifications to kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu() to detect batch
mode and route to appropriate allocation function
- SVM conflict checking extended for batch ranges
Signed-off-by: Honglei Huang <honghuan@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c
index a72cc980a..d0b56d5cc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c
@@ -1047,10 +1047,79 @@ static int kfd_ioctl_get_available_memory(struct file *filep,
return 0;
}
+static int kfd_copy_userptr_ranges(void __user *user_data, uint64_t expected_size,
+ struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_range **ranges_out,
+ uint32_t *num_ranges_out)
+{
+ struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_ranges_data ranges_header;
+ struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_range *ranges;
+ uint64_t total_size = 0;
+ uint32_t num_ranges;
+ size_t header_size;
+ uint32_t i;
+
+ if (!user_data) {
+ pr_err("Batch allocation: ranges pointer is NULL\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ header_size = offsetof(struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_ranges_data, ranges);
+ if (copy_from_user(&ranges_header, user_data, header_size)) {
+ pr_err("Failed to copy ranges data header from user space\n");
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+
+ num_ranges = ranges_header.num_ranges;
+ if (num_ranges == 0) {
+ pr_err("Batch allocation: invalid number of ranges %u\n", num_ranges);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (ranges_header.reserved != 0) {
+ pr_err("Batch allocation: reserved field must be 0\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ ranges = kvmalloc_array(num_ranges, sizeof(*ranges), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ranges)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(ranges, user_data + header_size,
+ num_ranges * sizeof(*ranges))) {
+ pr_err("Failed to copy ranges from user space\n");
+ kvfree(ranges);
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_ranges; i++) {
+ if (!ranges[i].start || !ranges[i].size ||
+ (ranges[i].start & ~PAGE_MASK) ||
+ (ranges[i].size & ~PAGE_MASK)) {
+ pr_err("Invalid range %u: start=0x%llx size=0x%llx\n",
+ i, ranges[i].start, ranges[i].size);
+ kvfree(ranges);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ total_size += ranges[i].size;
+ }
+
+ if (total_size != expected_size) {
+ pr_err("Size mismatch: provided %llu != calculated %llu\n",
+ expected_size, total_size);
+ kvfree(ranges);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ *ranges_out = ranges;
+ *num_ranges_out = num_ranges;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu(struct file *filep,
struct kfd_process *p, void *data)
{
struct kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu_args *args = data;
+ struct kfd_ioctl_userptr_range *ranges = NULL;
struct kfd_process_device *pdd;
void *mem;
struct kfd_node *dev;
@@ -1058,16 +1127,32 @@ static int kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu(struct file *filep,
long err;
uint64_t offset = args->mmap_offset;
uint32_t flags = args->flags;
+ uint32_t num_ranges = 0;
+ bool is_batch = false;
if (args->size == 0)
return -EINVAL;
+ if ((flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR) &&
+ (flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR_BATCH)) {
+ is_batch = true;
+ }
+
if (p->context_id != KFD_CONTEXT_ID_PRIMARY && (flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR)) {
pr_debug("USERPTR is not supported on non-primary kfd_process\n");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
+ if (is_batch) {
+ err = kfd_copy_userptr_ranges((void __user *)args->mmap_offset,
+ args->size, &ranges, &num_ranges);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ offset = 0;
+ }
+
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HSA_AMD_SVM)
/* Flush pending deferred work to avoid racing with deferred actions
* from previous memory map changes (e.g. munmap).
@@ -1086,13 +1171,15 @@ static int kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu(struct file *filep,
pr_err("Address: 0x%llx already allocated by SVM\n",
args->va_addr);
mutex_unlock(&p->svms.lock);
- return -EADDRINUSE;
+ err = -EADDRINUSE;
+ goto err_free_ranges;
}
/* When register user buffer check if it has been registered by svm by
* buffer cpu virtual address.
+ * For batch mode, check each range individually below.
*/
- if ((flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR) &&
+ if ((flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_USERPTR) && !is_batch &&
interval_tree_iter_first(&p->svms.objects,
args->mmap_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT,
(args->mmap_offset + args->size - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT)) {
@@ -1102,6 +1189,22 @@ static int kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu(struct file *filep,
return -EADDRINUSE;
}
+ /* Check each userptr range for SVM conflicts in batch mode */
+ if (is_batch) {
+ uint32_t i;
+ for (i = 0; i < num_ranges; i++) {
+ if (interval_tree_iter_first(&p->svms.objects,
+ ranges[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+ (ranges[i].start + ranges[i].size - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT)) {
+ pr_err("Userptr range %u (0x%llx) already allocated by SVM\n",
+ i, ranges[i].start);
+ mutex_unlock(&p->svms.lock);
+ err = -EADDRINUSE;
+ goto err_free_ranges;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
mutex_unlock(&p->svms.lock);
#endif
mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
@@ -1149,10 +1252,17 @@ static int kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu(struct file *filep,
}
}
- err = amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu(
- dev->adev, args->va_addr, args->size,
- pdd->drm_priv, (struct kgd_mem **) &mem, &offset,
- flags, false);
+ if (is_batch) {
+ err = amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu_batch(
+ dev->adev, args->va_addr, args->size, pdd->drm_priv,
+ (struct kgd_mem **)&mem, &offset, ranges, num_ranges,
+ flags, false);
+ } else {
+ err = amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu(
+ dev->adev, args->va_addr, args->size,
+ pdd->drm_priv, (struct kgd_mem **) &mem, &offset,
+ flags, false);
+ }
if (err)
goto err_unlock;
@@ -1184,6 +1294,9 @@ static int kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu(struct file *filep,
args->mmap_offset = KFD_MMAP_TYPE_MMIO
| KFD_MMAP_GPU_ID(args->gpu_id);
+ if (is_batch)
+ kvfree(ranges);
+
return 0;
err_free:
@@ -1193,6 +1306,9 @@ static int kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu(struct file *filep,
err_pdd:
err_large_bar:
mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
+err_free_ranges:
+ if (ranges)
+ kvfree(ranges);
return err;
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-09 6:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-09 6:10 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch userptr allocation support Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/amdkfd: Add userptr batch allocation UAPI structures Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/amdkfd: Add user_range_info infrastructure to kgd_mem Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/amdkfd: Implement interval tree for userptr ranges Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch MMU notifier support Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/amdkfd: Implement batch userptr page management Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/amdkfd: Add batch allocation function and export API Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/amdkfd: Unify userptr cleanup and update paths Honglei Huang
2026-02-09 6:10 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/amdkfd: Wire up batch allocation in ioctl handler Honglei Huang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox