From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: david@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, ypodemsk@redhat.com,
hughd@google.com, will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
npiggin@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
arnd@arndb.de, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
baohua@kernel.org, shy828301@gmail.com, riel@surriel.com,
jannh@google.com, jgross@suse.com, seanjc@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ioworker0@gmail.com,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] mm: use targeted IPIs for TLB sync with lockless page table walkers
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 15:45:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202074557.16544-2-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202074557.16544-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Currently, tlb_remove_table_sync_one() broadcasts IPIs to all CPUs to wait
for any concurrent lockless page table walkers (e.g., GUP-fast). This is
inefficient on systems with many CPUs, especially for RT workloads[1].
This patch introduces a per-CPU tracking mechanism to record which CPUs are
actively performing lockless page table walks for a specific mm_struct.
When freeing/unsharing page tables, we can now send IPIs only to the CPUs
that are actually walking that mm, instead of broadcasting to all CPUs.
In preparation for targeted IPIs; a follow-up will switch callers to
tlb_remove_table_sync_mm().
Note that the tracking adds ~3% latency to GUP-fast, as measured on a
64-core system.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1b27a3fa-359a-43d0-bdeb-c31341749367@kernel.org/
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
---
include/asm-generic/tlb.h | 2 ++
include/linux/mm.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/events/core.c | 2 ++
mm/gup.c | 2 ++
mm/mmu_gather.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
index 4aeac0c3d3f0..b6b06e6b879f 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static inline void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table)
#endif
void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void);
+void tlb_remove_table_sync_mm(struct mm_struct *mm);
#else
@@ -258,6 +259,7 @@ void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void);
#endif
static inline void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void) { }
+static inline void tlb_remove_table_sync_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE */
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index f8a8fd47399c..d92df995fcd1 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2995,6 +2995,40 @@ long memfd_pin_folios(struct file *memfd, loff_t start, loff_t end,
pgoff_t *offset);
int folio_add_pins(struct folio *folio, unsigned int pins);
+/*
+ * Track CPUs doing lockless page table walks to avoid broadcast IPIs
+ * during TLB flushes.
+ */
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct mm_struct *, active_lockless_pt_walk_mm);
+
+static inline void pt_walk_lockless_start(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+
+ /*
+ * Tell other CPUs we're doing lockless page table walk.
+ *
+ * Full barrier needed to prevent page table reads from being
+ * reordered before this write.
+ *
+ * Pairs with smp_rmb() in tlb_remove_table_sync_mm().
+ */
+ this_cpu_write(active_lockless_pt_walk_mm, mm);
+ smp_mb();
+}
+
+static inline void pt_walk_lockless_end(void)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+
+ /*
+ * Clear the pointer so other CPUs no longer see this CPU as walking
+ * the mm. Use smp_store_release to ensure page table reads complete
+ * before the clear is visible to other CPUs.
+ */
+ smp_store_release(this_cpu_ptr(&active_lockless_pt_walk_mm), NULL);
+}
+
int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages,
unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages);
int pin_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages,
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 5b5cb620499e..6539112c28ff 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -8190,7 +8190,9 @@ static u64 perf_get_page_size(unsigned long addr)
mm = &init_mm;
}
+ pt_walk_lockless_start(mm);
size = perf_get_pgtable_size(mm, addr);
+ pt_walk_lockless_end();
local_irq_restore(flags);
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 8e7dc2c6ee73..6748e28b27f2 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -3154,7 +3154,9 @@ static unsigned long gup_fast(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
* that come from callers of tlb_remove_table_sync_one().
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
+ pt_walk_lockless_start(current->mm);
gup_fast_pgd_range(start, end, gup_flags, pages, &nr_pinned);
+ pt_walk_lockless_end();
local_irq_restore(flags);
/*
diff --git a/mm/mmu_gather.c b/mm/mmu_gather.c
index 2faa23d7f8d4..35c89e4b6230 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_gather.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_gather.c
@@ -285,6 +285,56 @@ void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void)
smp_call_function(tlb_remove_table_smp_sync, NULL, 1);
}
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mm_struct *, active_lockless_pt_walk_mm);
+EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(active_lockless_pt_walk_mm);
+
+/**
+ * tlb_remove_table_sync_mm - send IPIs to CPUs doing lockless page table
+ * walk for @mm
+ *
+ * @mm: target mm; only CPUs walking this mm get an IPI.
+ *
+ * Like tlb_remove_table_sync_one() but only targets CPUs in
+ * active_lockless_pt_walk_mm.
+ */
+void tlb_remove_table_sync_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ cpumask_var_t target_cpus;
+ bool found_any = false;
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (WARN_ONCE(!mm, "NULL mm in %s\n", __func__)) {
+ tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* If we can't, fall back to broadcast. */
+ if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&target_cpus, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
+ tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ cpumask_clear(target_cpus);
+
+ /* Pairs with smp_mb() in pt_walk_lockless_start(). */
+ smp_rmb();
+
+ /* Find CPUs doing lockless page table walks for this mm */
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (per_cpu(active_lockless_pt_walk_mm, cpu) == mm) {
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, target_cpus);
+ found_any = true;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Only send IPIs to CPUs actually doing lockless walks */
+ if (found_any)
+ smp_call_function_many(target_cpus, tlb_remove_table_smp_sync,
+ NULL, 1);
+
+ free_cpumask_var(target_cpus);
+}
+
static void tlb_remove_table_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
{
__tlb_remove_table_free(container_of(head, struct mmu_table_batch, rcu));
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 7:45 [PATCH v4 0/3] targeted TLB sync IPIs for " Lance Yang
2026-02-02 7:45 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2026-02-02 9:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm: use targeted IPIs for TLB sync with " Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-02 12:14 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-02 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-02 13:23 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-02 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-02 14:28 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-02 16:20 ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-02 7:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: switch callers to tlb_remove_table_sync_mm() Lance Yang
2026-02-02 7:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] x86/tlb: add architecture-specific TLB IPI optimization support Lance Yang
2026-02-02 9:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] targeted TLB sync IPIs for lockless page table walkers Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-02 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] targeted TLB sync IPIs for lockless page table Lance Yang
2026-02-02 12:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-02 12:58 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-02 13:07 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-02 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-02 14:37 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-02 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-02 15:52 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-05 13:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-05 15:01 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-05 15:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-05 15:28 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-05 15:09 ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-05 15:31 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-05 15:41 ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-05 16:30 ` Lance Yang
2026-02-05 16:46 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-05 16:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-05 17:06 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-05 18:36 ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-05 22:49 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-05 21:30 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-05 17:00 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260202074557.16544-2-lance.yang@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ypodemsk@redhat.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox