linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 23:18:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260124221805.wuaYkfoS@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260113114630.152942-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com>

On 2026-01-13 12:46:29 [+0100], Marco Crivellari wrote:
> This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which has begun
> with the changes introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
> 
>    commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
>    commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
> 
> The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default behavior of
> workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload placement is
> optimized by the scheduler.
> 
> Before that to happen, workqueue users must be converted to the better named
> new workqueues with no intended behaviour changes:
> 
>    system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
>    system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
> 
> This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be
> removed in the future.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Sebastian


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-24 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-13 11:46 [PATCH v2 0/3] Replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue() users Marco Crivellari
2026-01-13 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-01-24 22:17   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-01-27 13:49   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-13 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-01-24 22:18   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-01-27 13:51   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-13 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
2026-01-14  2:01   ` Andrew Morton
2026-01-14  2:03   ` kernel test robot
2026-01-14  2:25   ` kernel test robot
2026-01-24 22:21   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-01-24 23:22     ` Andrew Morton
2026-01-27 13:55       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-26 15:43     ` Marco Crivellari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260124221805.wuaYkfoS@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox