From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 23:18:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260124221805.wuaYkfoS@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260113114630.152942-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
On 2026-01-13 12:46:29 [+0100], Marco Crivellari wrote:
> This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which has begun
> with the changes introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
>
> commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
> commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
>
> The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default behavior of
> workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload placement is
> optimized by the scheduler.
>
> Before that to happen, workqueue users must be converted to the better named
> new workqueues with no intended behaviour changes:
>
> system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
> system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
>
> This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq, system_unbound_wq) can be
> removed in the future.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-24 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-13 11:46 [PATCH v2 0/3] Replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue() users Marco Crivellari
2026-01-13 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-01-24 22:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-01-27 13:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-13 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: Replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-01-24 22:18 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-01-27 13:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-13 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
2026-01-14 2:01 ` Andrew Morton
2026-01-14 2:03 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-14 2:25 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-24 22:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-01-24 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2026-01-27 13:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-01-26 15:43 ` Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260124221805.wuaYkfoS@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox