Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net/smc: cap allocation order for SMC-R physically contiguous buffers

["D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com >]

On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:54:37AM +0100, Alexandra Winter wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23.01.26 09:23, D. Wythe wrote:
> Describe your changes in imperative mood.
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
> 
> 
> > For SMCR_PHYS_CONT_BUFS, the allocation order is now capped to
> > MAX_PAGE_ORDER, ensures the attempts to allocate the largest possible
> > physically contiguous chunk instead of failing with an invalid order,
> > which also avoid redundant "try-fail-degrade" cycles in __smc_buf_create().
> > 
> > For SMCR_MIXED_BUFS, If it's order exceeds MAX_PAGE_ORDER, skips the
> > doomed physical allocation attempt and fallback to virtual memory
> > immediately.
> > 
> 
> Proposal for a version in imperative mood (iiuc):
> "
> For SMCR_PHYS_CONT_BUFS, cap the allocation order to MAX_PAGE_ORDER. This
> ensures the attempts to allocate the largest possible physically contiguous
> chunk succeed, instead of failing with an invalid order. This also avoids
> redundant "try-fail-degrade" cycles in __smc_buf_create().
> 
> For SMCR_MIXED_BUFS, if its order exceeds MAX_PAGE_ORDER, skip the doomed
> physical allocation attempt and fallback to virtual memory immediately.
> "
> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Other than that: LGTM
> Reviewed-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Alexandra,

Thank you for your review and for providing the refined description.
I will use your suggested wording for the commit message in V2.

Best regards,
D. Wythe