From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, axelrasmussen@google.com,
yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, david@kernel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev,
zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com,
ryncsn@gmail.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH -next 2/7] mm/mglru: make calls to flush_reclaim_state() similar for MGLRU and non-MGLRU
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 13:42:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260120134256.2271710-3-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260120134256.2271710-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
Currently, flush_reclaim_state is placed differently between
shrink_node_memcgs and shrink_many. shrink_many (only used for gen-LRU)
calls it after each lruvec is shrunk, while shrink_node_memcgs calls it
only after all lruvecs have been shrunk.
This patch moves flush_reclaim_state into shrink_node_memcgs and calls it
after each lruvec. This unifies the behavior and is reasonable because:
1. flush_reclaim_state adds current->reclaim_state->reclaimed to
sc->nr_reclaimed.
2. For non-MGLRU root reclaim, this can help stop the iteration earlier
when nr_to_reclaim is reached.
3. For non-root reclaim, the effect is negligible since flush_reclaim_state
does nothing in that case.
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 3759cd52c336..5a156ff48520 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -6182,6 +6182,7 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
+ flush_reclaim_state(sc);
/* If partial walks are allowed, bail once goal is reached */
if (partial && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
mem_cgroup_iter_break(target_memcg, memcg);
@@ -6218,8 +6219,6 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
- flush_reclaim_state(sc);
-
nr_node_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed;
/* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 13:42 [RFC PATCH -next 0/7] Introduce heat-level memcg reclaim Chen Ridong
2026-01-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH -next 1/7] vmscan: add memcg heat level for reclaim Chen Ridong
2026-01-21 7:53 ` Chen Ridong
2026-01-21 14:58 ` Kairui Song
2026-01-22 2:32 ` Chen Ridong
2026-02-06 22:47 ` Yuanchu Xie
2026-02-09 8:17 ` Chen Ridong
2026-01-20 13:42 ` Chen Ridong [this message]
2026-01-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH -next 3/7] mm/mglru: rename should_abort_scan to lru_gen_should_abort_scan Chen Ridong
2026-01-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH -next 4/7] mm/mglru: extend lru_gen_shrink_lruvec to support root reclaim Chen Ridong
2026-01-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH -next 5/7] mm/mglru: combine shrink_many into shrink_node_memcgs Chen Ridong
2026-01-21 8:13 ` Chen Ridong
2026-01-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH -next 6/7] mm/mglru: remove memcg disable handling from lru_gen_shrink_node Chen Ridong
2026-01-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH -next 7/7] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2026-01-29 11:25 ` [RFC PATCH -next 0/7] Introduce heat-level memcg reclaim Chen Ridong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260120134256.2271710-3-chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--to=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox