From: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Chris Mason" <clm@meta.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>,
"Xin Li" <xin@zytor.com>,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>,
"Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>, "Nam Cao" <namcao@linutronix.de>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Perry Yuan" <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Uros Bizjak" <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.1 03/10] x86/entry/vdso: refactor the vdso build
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:58:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260116035807.2307742-1-clm@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260106211856.560186-3-hpa@zytor.com>
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 13:18:36 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I ran the tip master branch through my AI review prompts and this one was
flagged. These look right to me, apologies if it's noise:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/common/Makefile.include b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/common/Makefile.include
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..3514b4a6869b7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/common/Makefile.include
[ ... ]
> +#
> +# Options from KBUILD_[AC]FLAGS that should *NOT* be kept
> +#
> +flags-remove-y += \
> + -D__KERNEL__ -mcmodel=kernel -mregparm=3 \
> + -fno-pic -fno-PIC -fno-pie fno-PIE \
^^^^^^^
Should this be "-fno-PIE" with the leading dash? The other flags in this
line all have the dash prefix, but "fno-PIE" is missing it. Without the
dash, filter-out won't match the actual compiler flag.
> + -mfentry -pg \
> + $(RANDSTRUCT_CFLAGS) $(GCC_PLUGIN_CFLAGS) $(KSTACK_ERASE_CFLAGS) \
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is GCC_PLUGIN_CFLAGS the right variable name here? The kbuild system
defines GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS (with an 's') in scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins.
Other vDSO Makefiles (arm64, sparc, arm) use GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS. Without
the fix, gcc plugin flags won't be filtered out when CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS=y.
> + $(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS) $(CC_FLAGS_LTO) $(CC_FLAGS_CFI) \
> + $(PADDING_CFLAGS)
[ ... ]
> +# Reset cf protections enabled by compiler default
> +flags-y += $(call cc-option, -fcf-protection=none)
> +flags-$(X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK) += $(call cc-option, -fcf-protection=return)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Should this be CONFIG_X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK? The Kconfig symbol is defined
as "config X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK" and kbuild exposes it as a CONFIG_
prefixed variable. The next lines show the pattern:
> +# When user space IBT is supported, enable this.
> +# flags-$(CONFIG_USER_IBT) += $(call cc-option, -fcf-protection=branch)
> +
> +flags-$(CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE) += $(RETPOLINE_VDSO_CFLAGS)
Both of these correctly use the CONFIG_ prefix. Without it, the shadow
stack cf-protection flag will never be added to vDSO builds even when
CONFIG_X86_USER_SHADOW_STACK=y.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-16 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-16 21:25 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/entry/vdso: clean up the vdso build, vdso updates H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-16 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] x86/entry/vdso: rename vdso_image_* to vdso*_image H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-16 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/entry/vdso: move vdso2c to arch/x86/tools H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-16 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] x86/entry/vdso: refactor the vdso build H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-16 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] x86/entry/vdso32: don't rely on int80_landing_pad for adjusting ip H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-16 21:25 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] x86/entry/vdso32: remove SYSCALL_ENTER_KERNEL macro in sigreturn.S H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-16 21:26 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] x86/entry/vdso32: remove open-coded DWARF " H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-16 21:26 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] x86/entry/vdso: include GNU_PROPERTY and GNU_STACK PHDRs H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-18 2:16 ` Brian Gerst
2025-12-18 6:56 ` Brian Gerst
2025-12-16 21:26 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] x86/vdso: abstract out vdso system call internals H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-06 18:09 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-12-16 21:26 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] x86/cpufeature: replace X86_FEATURE_SYSENTER32 with X86_FEATURE_SYSFAST32 H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-16 21:26 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] x86/entry/vdso32: when using int $0x80, use it directly H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v4.1 00/10] x86/entry/vdso: clean up the vdso build, vdso updates H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v4.1 01/10] x86/entry/vdso: rename vdso_image_* to vdso*_image H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v4.1 02/10] x86/entry/vdso: move vdso2c to arch/x86/tools H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v4.1 03/10] x86/entry/vdso: refactor the vdso build H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-16 3:58 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2026-01-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v4.1 04/10] x86/entry/vdso32: don't rely on int80_landing_pad for adjusting ip H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v4.1 05/10] x86/entry/vdso32: remove SYSCALL_ENTER_KERNEL macro in sigreturn.S H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v4.1 06/10] x86/entry/vdso32: remove open-coded DWARF " H. Peter Anvin
2026-02-02 17:02 ` Jens Remus
2026-02-03 3:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-02-10 3:11 ` Xi Ruoyao
2026-02-10 4:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-02-10 4:45 ` Xi Ruoyao
2026-02-10 4:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-02-10 4:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-02-10 4:56 ` Xi Ruoyao
2026-02-10 5:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v4.1 07/10] x86/entry/vdso: include GNU_PROPERTY and GNU_STACK PHDRs H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-07 12:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-01-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v4.1 08/10] x86/vdso: abstract out vdso system call internals H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v4.1 09/10] x86/cpufeature: replace X86_FEATURE_SYSENTER32 with X86_FEATURE_SYSFAST32 H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-06 21:18 ` [PATCH v4.1 10/10] x86/entry/vdso32: when using int $0x80, use it directly H. Peter Anvin
2026-01-15 7:00 ` [PATCH v4.1 00/10] x86/entry/vdso: clean up the vdso build, vdso updates Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-01-15 15:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260116035807.2307742-1-clm@meta.com \
--to=clm@meta.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox