Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/hugetlb: Remove unnecessary if condition

[Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>]

On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 13:59:42 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:10:51 -0500 Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > > -				spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> > > > -			}
> > > > +			spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> > > > +			hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(
> > > > +			    hstate_index(h), pages_per_huge_page(h),
> > > > +			    folio);
> > > > +			spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> > > >   		}
> > > >   	}
> > > >   
> > > 
> > > MAP_CHG_NEEDED = 1
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Thank you David, I agree it's helpful to include MAP_CHG_NEEDED != 0.
> 
> Oh.
> 
> > Will add in the v2! Have a great day : -)
> 
> While in there, this:
> 
> > > > +			hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(
> > > > +			    hstate_index(h), pages_per_huge_page(h),
> > > > +			    folio);
> 
> contains now-less-needed 80-column party tricks.

Ah, that's a nice catch as well. I'll be sure to include it as well!

My bigger motivation for sending a v2 was mostly to separate out the
fix from the cleanup patches. Since they are separate now, I'll send out a
v2 for 2/3 and 3/3, while I wait for reviews for 1/3 and send out a v2 for
that one at a later point. For what it's worth, I don't think the fix is
super urgent : -)

Thanks again, Andrew!
Joshua