From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23800D47CAA for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 83F706B0095; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:00:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 809B76B0096; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:00:16 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 736616B0098; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:00:16 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B9B6B0095 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:00:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A69F1A04BA for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84335869632.17.8F7175E Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8663914000B for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=AKrPb8qY; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 172.234.252.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1768521614; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=jLxOPoNZbVhb+vRNC7irrXeYXKtYaIXi9QgiQJXGT/s=; b=tf+LVzeImsSH86dvQkqZa0wC3bFyUbBxJjYpXI5EMpJ7XMlEcHlteULpLsIjzGGkLvBSZF TFK0D8Y7sW0UfOGmnlp0LX9DTysCr/IDF6qOBa9ON67F/bo+KIgTezBNVhFRY9POQ+EzTW KxYeXsb3ddmQZoK0YD8ydpyqMePsfqY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=AKrPb8qY; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 172.234.252.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1768521614; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=U+3eOsoCq1TKqhoMeelU7WmUsWOLUBJZVSlgkhZ/B/PmEsX9O5cKS5HBGcO0UCkNMmUgU7 CGOLrpA5Ld7BH6iGJg7b3TRJqYj7zrkEAk0UySAGR0UoTDOwetKgwuxJdLwbor0yixL18Q ONZuiNwK1kK2y0a93yjJ9qNJesHqMnA= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DD843E9F; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CEC7C116D0; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1768521613; bh=zld3AdtUOIHhx3f8LkbO7KV0NONlEXy9qHMcSpdYqO0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AKrPb8qYK/xcbXFwX1jqFte9UFIUe7ItN3F820LjpAnZcPr4OhV1l+frX+3Fmrg7T M/E0SplVJYcCG28K4uWynEPDmff+4lrdO0RzdcQERONJsKRGOxxEOYrCCPOFf8WdUU X430A6O+GdXvOHEnNaip3Z88ofPFmB23pnBaGf9g= Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:00:11 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Bing Jiao Cc: David Hildenbrand , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Axel Rasmussen , Yuanchu Xie , Wei Xu , Johannes Weiner , Qi Zheng , Shakeel Butt , Gregory Price , Joshua Hahn , muchun.song@linux.dev, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] mm/vmscan: fix demotion targets checks in reclaim/demotion Message-Id: <20260115160011.29dca1c262ab1fb887857508@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20260114205305.2869796-1-bingjiao@google.com> References: <20260114070053.2446770-1-bingjiao@google.com> <20260114205305.2869796-1-bingjiao@google.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8663914000B X-Stat-Signature: hr88i89zsft9cpkrpurdb4e7msedq4fu X-HE-Tag: 1768521614-706518 X-HE-Meta: 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 0o/J67wv HDwB4Y/mDV+v09e7QzKFZbmUslQ== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 20:53:01 +0000 Bing Jiao wrote: > I’m resubmitting the full refreshed patch series together this time. > I just realized it is better to include the unmodified patches alongside > the modified ones to ensure compatibility with upstream automated tools > and to simplify your review process. No probs. [1/2] is cc:stable whereas [2/2] is not. Ordinarily that means I must split the series apart (they take different routes) and often discard the [0/n]. In this case I think I'll leave things as-is, so [1/2]'s entry into the -stable pipeline will occur a few weeks later. I don't think the problem is serious enough to need super-fast-tracking? Hopefully this approach means we'll get some Reviewed-bys ;)