From: "Li Zhe" <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
To: <david@kernel.org>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
<fvdl@google.com>, <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<lizhe.67@bytedance.com>, <mhocko@suse.com>, <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
<muchun.song@linux.dev>, <osalvador@suse.de>,
<raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Introduce a huge-page pre-zeroing mechanism
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 14:37:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260113063736.29694-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee0bbcde-612b-4a53-aa2a-bc3f60302408@kernel.org>
On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 20:52:12 +0100, david@kernel.org wrote:
> > As for concern (4), I believe it is orthogonal to this patchset, and
> > the cover letter already contains a performance comparison that
> > demonstrates the additional benefit.
> >
> >> I did see some comments in [1] about QEMU supporting user-mode
> >> parallel zero-page operations; I'm just not sure what the current
> >> state of that support looks like, or what the corresponding benchmark
> >> numbers are.
> >
> > As noted above, QEMU already employs a parallel page-touch mechanism,
> > yet the elapsed time remains noticeable. I am not deeply familiar with
> > QEMU; please correct me if I am mistaken.
>
> I implemented some part of the parallel preallocation support in QEMU.
>
> With QEMU, you can specify the number of threads and even specify the
> NUMA-placement of these threads. So you can pretty much fine-tune that
> for an environment.
>
> You still pre-zero all hugetlb pages at VM startup time, just in
> parallel though. So you pay some price at APP startup time.
Hi David,
Thank you for the comprehensive explanation.
You are absolutely correct: QEMU's parallel preallocation is performed
only during VM start-up. We submitted this patch series mainly
because we observed that, even with the existing parallel mechanism,
launching large-size VMs still incurs prohibitive delays. (Bringing up
a 2 TB VM still requires more than 40 seconds for zeroing)
> If you know that you will run such a VM (or something else) later, you
> could pre-zero the memory from user space by using a hugetlb-backed file
> and supplying that to QEMU as memory backend for the VM. Then, you can
> start your VM without any pre-zeroing.
>
> I guess that approach should work universally. Of course, there are
> limitations, as you would have to know how much memory an app needs, and
> have a way to supply that memory in form of a file to that app.
Regarding user-space pre-zeroing, I agree that it is feasible once the
VM's memory footprint is known. We evaluated this approach internally;
however, in production environments, it is almost impossible to predict
the exact amount of memory a VM will require.
Thanks,
Zhe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-07 11:31 Li Zhe
2026-01-07 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/hugetlb: add pre-zeroed framework Li Zhe
2026-01-07 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] mm/hugetlb: convert to prep_account_new_hugetlb_folio() Li Zhe
2026-01-07 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] mm/hugetlb: move the huge folio to the end of the list during enqueue Li Zhe
2026-01-07 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] mm/hugetlb: introduce per-node sysfs interface "zeroable_hugepages" Li Zhe
2026-01-07 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] mm/hugetlb: simplify function hugetlb_sysfs_add_hstate() Li Zhe
2026-01-07 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] mm/hugetlb: relocate the per-hstate struct kobject pointer Li Zhe
2026-01-07 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] mm/hugetlb: add epoll support for interface "zeroable_hugepages" Li Zhe
2026-01-07 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] mm/hugetlb: limit event generation frequency of function do_zero_free_notify() Li Zhe
2026-01-07 16:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Introduce a huge-page pre-zeroing mechanism Andrew Morton
2026-01-12 11:25 ` Li Zhe
2026-01-09 6:05 ` Muchun Song
2026-01-12 11:27 ` Li Zhe
2026-01-12 19:52 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2026-01-13 6:37 ` Li Zhe [this message]
2026-01-12 22:00 ` Ankur Arora
2026-01-13 6:39 ` Li Zhe
2026-01-12 22:01 ` Ankur Arora
2026-01-13 6:41 ` Li Zhe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260113063736.29694-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
--to=lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox