From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: "Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@google.com>
Cc: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <m.wieczorretman@pm.me>,
joonki.min@samsung-slsi.corp-partner.google.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@google.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
jiayuan.chen@linux.dev,
syzbot+997752115a851cb0cf36@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
Kernel hackers <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: KASAN vs realloc
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 12:28:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202601071226.8DF7C63@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANP3RGeuRW53vukDy7WDO3FiVgu34-xVJYkfpm08oLO3odYFrA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 01:42:45PM +0100, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> We've got internal reports (b/467571011 - from CC'ed Samsung
> developer) that kasan realloc is broken for sizes that are not a
> multiple of the granule. This appears to be triggered during Android
> bootup by some ebpf program loading operations (a struct is 88 bytes
> in size, which is a multiple of 8, but not 16, which is the granule
> size).
>
> (this is on 6.18 with
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/38dece0a4074c43e48150d1e242f8242c73bf1a5.1764874575.git.m.wieczorretman@pm.me/
> already included)
>
> joonki.min@samsung-slsi.corp-partner.google.com summarized it as
> "When newly requested size is not bigger than allocated size and old
> size was not 16 byte aligned, it failed to unpoison extended area."
>
> and *very* rough comment:
>
> Right. "size - old_size" is not guaranteed 16-byte alignment in this case.
>
> I think we may unpoison 16-byte alignment size, but it allowed more
> than requested :(
>
> I'm not sure that's right approach.
>
> if (size <= alloced_size) {
> - kasan_unpoison_vmalloc(p + old_size, size - old_size,
> + kasan_unpoison_vmalloc(p + old_size, round_up(size -
> old_size, KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE),
> KASAN_VMALLOC_PROT_NORMAL |
> KASAN_VMALLOC_VM_ALLOC |
> KASAN_VMALLOC_KEEP_TAG);
> /*
> * No need to zero memory here, as unused memory will have
> * already been zeroed at initial allocation time or during
> * realloc shrink time.
> */
> - vm->requested_size = size;
> + vm->requested_size = round_up(size, KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE);
>
> my personal guess is that
>
> But just above the code you quoted in mm/vmalloc.c I see:
> if (size <= old_size) {
> ...
> kasan_poison_vmalloc(p + size, old_size - size);
>
> is also likely wrong?? Considering:
>
> mm/kasan/shadow.c
>
> void __kasan_poison_vmalloc(const void *start, unsigned long size)
> {
> if (!is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(start))
> return;
>
> size = round_up(size, KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE);
> kasan_poison(start, size, KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID, false);
> }
>
> This doesn't look right - if start isn't a multiple of the granule.
I don't think we can ever have the start not be a granule multiple, can
we?
I'm not sure how any of this is supposed to be handled by KASAN, though.
It does seem like a round_up() is missing, though?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-07 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-06 12:42 Maciej Żenczykowski
2026-01-07 20:28 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2026-01-07 20:47 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2026-01-07 21:47 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2026-01-07 21:50 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2026-01-07 21:55 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2026-01-09 18:55 ` Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2026-01-09 20:05 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202601071226.8DF7C63@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=joonki.min@samsung-slsi.corp-partner.google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.wieczorretman@pm.me \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=maze@google.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+997752115a851cb0cf36@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox